Dark Souls 3 review error

[Centurio333]

You put an Italian site I read as a 4.5, instead of the 9 it has. Messing with the score big time.
https://www.actugaming.net/test-dark-souls-iii-fin-de-serie-apotheose-24207/

Seems like someone else noticed that about another FROM game. Maybe you should hire someone to look through every single game to see if everything's accurate
https://www.techspot.com/community/topics/big-bloodborne-review-mistake.253897/

 

[Centurio333]

Ooops meant to say French mon erreur! Had a brainfart.

 

[Julio Franco]

Thanks, now fixed We do have someone looking over all products but with such a massive DB some errors will inevitably slip. I wonder how you detected this one since it was buried deep down after all the English reviews.

 

[Centurio333]

LOL cool. Just a piece of advice, for Dark Souls 2 and 3, reviews for Ivory King, and Iron King, and Ashes of Aridenel are included on the main page, which is inconsistent because Ringed City, Old Hunters and Sunken King have there own separate pages, which heavily drags the aggregate down. For consistency maybe you should make a page for them and transfer the reviews over?
If you want some help, these are the ones for Ashes.
https://www.tomshw.it/videogioco/recensione-dark-souls-3-ashes-of-ariandel/
https://www.xboxdynasty.de/review/dark-souls-iii/test-zum-ersten-dlc-ashes-ariandel/
https://www.destructoid.com/review-dark-souls-iii-ashes-of-ariandel-394199.phtml
https://www.hardcoregamer.com/2016/10/20/review-dark-souls-iii-ashes-of-ariandel/231648/
https://wccftech.com/review/dark-souls-iii-dlc-ashes-ariandel-review/
https://www.polygon.com/2016/10/25/...-ashes-of-ariandel-review-dlc-ps4-xbox-one-pc

And these are ones for the Ringed City,
https://www.gamespot.com/reviews/dark-souls-3-the-ringed-city-review/1900-6416643/
https://nordic.ign.com/dark-souls-3...63/review/dark-souls-3-the-ringed-city-review

That should be brought over to it's page!

LOL I tend too much time looking at Aggregate sites, in between work shifts, sorry for being noisy, anyways cheers!

 

[Quadropops]

LOL cool. Just a piece of advice, for Dark Souls 2 and 3, reviews for Ivory King, and Iron King, and Ashes of Aridenel are included on the main page, which is inconsistent because Ringed City, Old Hunters and Sunken King have there own separate pages, which heavily drags the aggregate down. For consistency maybe you should make a page for them and transfer the reviews over?
If you want some help, these are the ones for Ashes.
https://www.tomshw.it/videogioco/recensione-dark-souls-3-ashes-of-ariandel/
https://www.xboxdynasty.de/review/dark-souls-iii/test-zum-ersten-dlc-ashes-ariandel/
https://www.destructoid.com/review-dark-souls-iii-ashes-of-ariandel-394199.phtml
https://www.hardcoregamer.com/2016/10/20/review-dark-souls-iii-ashes-of-ariandel/231648/
https://wccftech.com/review/dark-souls-iii-dlc-ashes-ariandel-review/
https://www.polygon.com/2016/10/25/...-ashes-of-ariandel-review-dlc-ps4-xbox-one-pc

And these are ones for the Ringed City,
https://www.gamespot.com/reviews/dark-souls-3-the-ringed-city-review/1900-6416643/
https://nordic.ign.com/dark-souls-3...63/review/dark-souls-3-the-ringed-city-review

That should be brought over to it's page!

LOL I tend too much time looking at Aggregate sites, in between work shifts, sorry for being noisy, anyways cheers!

nah thee dark souls2 one has bareely any other reviews for the DLC chapters, but yeah, the Ashes one should be made into it;s own page like Old Hunters.

 

[Centurio333]

nah thee dark souls2 one has bareely any other reviews for the DLC chapters, but yeah, the Ashes one should be made into it;s own page like Old Hunters.

Oh my mistake.