Hello,
I've just built a new pc and am using vista for the first time (business 64).
I have just defragged as i usually done on xp (with jkdefrag, then scan with defraggler to check success). There is still a lot of fragmentation.
Some research has suggested this is due to hibernation being enabled (not virtual memory though, since I've disabled this because I'd like to set it after defragmentation). the most fragmented files are in "volume information" (or perhaps "system information", I'm not at home just now).
I have a couple of questions:
1) If I disable hibernation to defrag, do I then have to re-enable it? Is there a risk with not having it?
2) How come this never happened in xp? Jkdefrafg was always totally successful on that.
thanks again
gubar
I've just built a new pc and am using vista for the first time (business 64).
I have just defragged as i usually done on xp (with jkdefrag, then scan with defraggler to check success). There is still a lot of fragmentation.
Some research has suggested this is due to hibernation being enabled (not virtual memory though, since I've disabled this because I'd like to set it after defragmentation). the most fragmented files are in "volume information" (or perhaps "system information", I'm not at home just now).
I have a couple of questions:
1) If I disable hibernation to defrag, do I then have to re-enable it? Is there a risk with not having it?
2) How come this never happened in xp? Jkdefrafg was always totally successful on that.
thanks again
gubar