mrvco
Posts: 287 +294
I believe You're wrong. If there're are 21"FHD monitors for under $100 and 4K 28"monitors for under $400 then there's no technical reason why Philips 40" 4K TV and 40" 4K monitors based on the same panel should be $500 apart other then milking consumers who's willing to pay on an old "supply and demand" scheme. Samsung already have a 4K@60Hz@4:4:4chroma under 30ms input lag for under $500 (ironically, no DP port, which was supposed to be a free license).Not really. You can't compare a 4K TV to a 4K monitor. The electronics are vastly superior to a 4K 60Hz TV. Input lag, colour quality, gtg response and so on.Technically it's...
TN vs IPS