Discovery of massive lava tubes on Venus raises new questions for science

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,901   +58
Staff
The takeaway: Little is understood about the geology of Venus, and recent findings suggest that the planet's subsurface processes may not follow the same patterns observed elsewhere. Future missions equipped with advanced radar instruments will be needed to determine how these newly discovered underground voids have shaped the planet's broader volcanic history.

Massive lava-carved tunnels have been confirmed beneath the surface of Venus, providing the strongest evidence yet that the planet's volcanic past created underground networks unlike those on any other world in the solar system.

Researchers led by Barbara De Toffoli of the University of Padova in Italy reported that new analyses point to the existence of lava tubes on Venus with volumes comparable to those on the Moon, despite the planet's gravity being much closer to Earth's. These findings were presented earlier this month at the Europlanet Science Congress in Helsinki.

For decades, planetary scientists have documented lava tubes on Earth, the Moon, and Mars, noting that their size generally scales with gravity. Weaker gravity allows tunnels to span greater widths, since the rock walls are less prone to collapse. Lunar tubes are so spacious that space agencies have even considered them as potential sites for astronaut bases, offering natural protection from radiation and extreme surface conditions.

On Venus, surface features such as pits and depressions had long hinted at possible lava tubes, but there was no consensus on whether these markings were volcanic in origin or the result of unrelated geological processes like faulting. The new study sought to resolve this question by combining radar imagery and mapping data from past missions. The team focused on regions around large volcanoes, comparing the arrangement of pit chains and evaluating their depth-to-width ratios against known lava tube signatures.

The analysis identified four distinct examples that fit the expected volcanic pattern and could not be explained by tectonic or other processes. The pit alignments consistently followed the steepest volcanic slopes – the direction in which lava would naturally flow – further supporting their interpretation as collapsed segments of extensive lava tubes.

What surprised researchers most was not the presence of the tubes but their scale. On Earth, lava tubes are relatively modest; on Mars, they are somewhat larger; and on the Moon, they grow larger still, following the predictable relationship with gravity. Venus breaks this pattern.

"Earth lava tubes have smaller volumes, Mars tubes have slightly bigger volumes, and then the moon's tubes have even bigger volumes – and then there's Venus, completely disrupting this trend, displaying very, very big tube volumes," De Toffoli said in her presentation.

Permalink to story:

 
Did anything ever come of that whole phosphene gas discovery on Venus? Guessing the next stage of that discovery is trying to somehow get funding to actually go to Venus and look.
 
So we know that gravity can put the squeeze on a planet and make it more geolgically active - especially when tidal forces are at play... but has anyone considered the extreme atmospheric pressure sequeezing the planet as well? It could be insignificant, but something to think about.
 
Just as metals get softer when heated, could the same not be said about the crust and mantle layers of the planet? It just seems like Venus’ enormous heat is the most obvious solution at this point.
 
Just as metals get softer when heated, could the same not be said about the crust and mantle layers of the planet? It just seems like Venus’ enormous heat is the most obvious solution at this point.
The heat of Venus's atmosphere is minor compared to the heat of molten lava that would be in these tubes. Venus' atmosphere hits highs of 465C, but molten lava is 700-1200C. If atmosphere played such a part, then Mars' tubes should be substantially smaller then earths, not somewhat larger as they are.
So we know that gravity can put the squeeze on a planet and make it more geolgically active - especially when tidal forces are at play... but has anyone considered the extreme atmospheric pressure sequeezing the planet as well? It could be insignificant, but something to think about.
If that were true, Venus's tubes should be smaller than earths, not larger, since venus' atmosphere exerts 93x the pressure of Earths. Mars also lacks atmospheric pressure but has larger tubes.
Did anything ever come of that whole phosphene gas discovery on Venus? Guessing the next stage of that discovery is trying to somehow get funding to actually go to Venus and look.
That would be very difficult, as the longest a probe has lasted on Venus' surface has been just over 2 hours. I cant imagine the construction that could last for weeks or even days on the surface to get accurate atmospheric readings.
 
The heat of Venus's atmosphere is minor compared to the heat of molten lava that would be in these tubes. Venus' atmosphere hits highs of 465C, but molten lava is 700-1200C. If atmosphere played such a part, then Mars' tubes should be substantially smaller then earths, not somewhat larger as they are.
If that were true, Venus's tubes should be smaller than earths, not larger, since venus' atmosphere exerts 93x the pressure of Earths. Mars also lacks atmospheric pressure but has larger tubes.
That would be very difficult, as the longest a probe has lasted on Venus' surface has been just over 2 hours. I cant imagine the construction that could last for weeks or even days on the surface to get accurate atmospheric readings.

-I've read that really what would have to happen is a floating probe that achieves neutral buyancy high up in the thick Venetian atmosphere where the sulfuric acid etc doesn't exist.

There it can collect atmosphere samples and conduct more precise measurements.
 
The heat of Venus's atmosphere is minor compared to the heat of molten lava that would be in these tubes. Venus' atmosphere hits highs of 465C, but molten lava is 700-1200C. If atmosphere played such a part, then Mars' tubes should be substantially smaller then earths, not somewhat larger as they are.
If that were true, Venus's tubes should be smaller than earths, not larger, since venus' atmosphere exerts 93x the pressure of Earths. Mars also lacks atmospheric pressure but has larger tubes.
That would be very difficult, as the longest a probe has lasted on Venus' surface has been just over 2 hours. I cant imagine the construction that could last for weeks or even days on the surface to get accurate atmospheric readings.

It wouldn’t necessarily have to be at the melting point, though. And both the moon and mars have substantially weaker gravity than earth, as well as larger tubes. I think either low gravity or elevated heat would create environments conducive to larger tubes; lower gravity exerts less resistance while higher heat slows down cooling. In any case, atmospheric pressure seems to have no correlation here, as both extremes of pressure have demonstrated larger tubes.
 
The super-high-pressure atmosphere has something to do with that. Not a big mystery. The result of high-pressure exchange between lava and the atmosphere.


 
It wouldn’t necessarily have to be at the melting point, though. And both the moon and mars have substantially weaker gravity than earth, as well as larger tubes. I think either low gravity or elevated heat would create environments conducive to larger tubes; lower gravity exerts less resistance while higher heat slows down cooling. In any case, atmospheric pressure seems to have no correlation here, as both extremes of pressure have demonstrated larger tubes.
"Weaker gravity allows tunnels to span greater widths, since the rock walls are less prone to collapse." From the article. Venus having larger tunnels DESPITE higher gravity is an anomaly that is currently unexplained. High pressure should be conductive to smaller tubes, not larger ones, as it would apply force similar to high gravity, especially at venus' 93x earth pressure.
The super-high-pressure atmosphere has something to do with that. Not a big mystery. The result of high-pressure exchange between lava and the atmosphere.
High pressure should result in smaller tubes, not bigger ones.
-I've read that really what would have to happen is a floating probe that achieves neutral buyancy high up in the thick Venetian atmosphere where the sulfuric acid etc doesn't exist.

There it can collect atmosphere samples and conduct more precise measurements.
Interesting. What design have they proposed for this? I'd be curious how they plan to maintain stability in atmosphere.
 
High pressure should result in smaller tubes, not bigger ones.

If the atmospheric pressure exceeds that of fresh lava, it will be able to squeeze lava out of the tube and widen it, which is what's happening.

It's like planetary sigmoidoscopy :)
 
Last edited:
Back