Dropbox CEO slams return-to-office mandates, compares them to outdated malls and theaters

midian182

Posts: 10,776   +142
Staff member
A hot potato: Here's a rare sight: a CEO of a large company has spoken out in support of remote work for employees, slamming those firms that drag staff back into the office against their will. Dropbox boss Drew Houston compared RTO mandates to trying to force people back into malls and movie theaters.

Speaking on an episode of Fortune's "Leadership Next" podcast, Houston said what most people have long thought: that returning to the office is a waste of time and money when employees can do exactly the same tasks at home.

"We can be a lot less dumb than forcing people back into a car three days a week or whatever, to literally be back on the same Zoom meeting they would have been at home," he said. "There's a better way to do this."

Dropbox remains one of the few companies that has continued to embrace a "virtual first" approach following the end of the lockdowns. As reported by Business Insider, Dropbox introduced a 90/10 rule in 2021, where employees work from home for about 90% of the year and attend a small number of off-site events the remaining 10%.

"Forcing people back to the office is probably gonna be like trying to force people back into malls and movie theaters," Houston said. "Nothing wrong with the movie theater, but it's just a different world now."

The Dropbox CEO has spoken out in favor of remote work before. In 2023, he called it "the keys that unlock this whole future of work."

"You need a different social contract and to let go of control. But if you trust people and treat them like adults, they'll behave like adults. Trust over surveillance," he said at the time.

Few modern work-life issues have proved as controversial as the RTO mandates. It's no secret that the vast majority of people are happier working in their own home. A recent study found that fewer than half of UK workers would agree to a full-time return-to-office (RTO) mandate, with women and parents the most likely to refuse. We've also seen employees willing to sacrifice up to 15% of their wages in exchange for a more flexible work life.

But apart from the few exceptions like Houston, most executives care little about employees' wishes and are against remote work, claiming that productivity and collaboration improve when in an office. Companies such as EA are telling all employees to return to their work locations at least three days per week, while the likes of Amazon and Dell are telling workers who live close(ish) to an office to return full-time or leave the company.

A recent study claimed that the most productive staff work in shorter bursts and take longer breaks: 75 minutes of work followed by 33 minutes of rest time. It also suggests that in-office and hybrid work actually encourage a healthier work-life balance than fully remote models.

Permalink to story:

 
We all know the real reason why CEOs want people to stop working from home. Because if all these empty office buildings stay empty, landlords and banks will lose a lot of money on property values. They're trying to keep property values artificially high.
 
LOL. I'm honestly surprised the company is still operating. The work ethic really varies depending on the individual. I started fully remote, and my performance has remained consistent—if not improved—over time. On the other hand, nearly everyone who began on-site saw a noticeable decline in their performance.
 
I'm sure this goes both ways. Generally studies have shown people are more productive when working from home, so the push for workers to return is not about productive but rather about maintaining value of their office buildings.
No it's about team cohesion is simple fact you can work from home all day long but you're now a unit of one instead of a member of a team individual productivity may go up but overall team productivity usually goes down these studies are only focusing on individual productivity.

It's time to bring people back into the office teamwork makes a dream working right now you don't get that in a remote setting. Of course if you don't like it go start your own business there's always the option.
 
No it's about team cohesion is simple fact you can work from home all day long but you're now a unit of one instead of a member of a team individual productivity may go up but overall team productivity usually goes down these studies are only focusing on individual productivity.

It's time to bring people back into the office teamwork makes a dream working right now you don't get that in a remote setting. Of course if you don't like it go start your own business there's always the option.
That's true for some jobs, but when CEOs start demanding people who don't work in a team return to the office, something is off.

Like I said, studies have shown in general people are more productive working from home. They don't have to commute and clog up freeways, they don't have to worry about a work uniform or what they're going to do for lunch from the office.

Some jobs require being physically there. No one would expect a car mechanic to work remotely. But for many many jobs, working from home is ideal.

I didn't invent the data. Look it up yourself before you argue further.
 
That's true for some jobs, but when CEOs start demanding people who don't work in a team return to the office, something is off.

Like I said, studies have shown in general people are more productive working from home. They don't have to commute and clog up freeways, they don't have to worry about a work uniform or what they're going to do for lunch from the office.

Some jobs require being physically there. No one would expect a car mechanic to work remotely. But for many many jobs, working from home is ideal.

I didn't invent the data. Look it up yourself before you argue further.
the data is irrelevant, if you dont like it find a new job, the employee has no say.
 
That's true for some jobs, but when CEOs start demanding people who don't work in a team return to the office, something is off.

Like I said, studies have shown in general people are more productive working from home. They don't have to commute and clog up freeways, they don't have to worry about a work uniform or what they're going to do for lunch from the office.

Some jobs require being physically there. No one would expect a car mechanic to work remotely. But for many many jobs, working from home is ideal.

I didn't invent the data. Look it up yourself before you argue further.
Wow those are all such horrible things! Putting on some clothes and driving and getting some food for lunch? I had no clue these things were killing my productivity at work. I returned to these things after I left California because the government there thought it was harmful to work in person together. Now I know it’s just unproductive according to bogus studies.

To be honest, working fully remote was depressing as hell and THAT killed productivity. Everyone knows this is what happened, and similarly children’s education also suffered tremendously. Did they include that in your uncited studies?
 
What works for one business model may not work for another. If that CEO is ok with WFH, then
so be it. But, if another company says you have to be at the office, so be it.
Don't like it? QUIT and go somewhere else, or, start your own company.
 
That's true for some jobs, but when CEOs start demanding people who don't work in a team return to the office, something is off.

Like I said, studies have shown in general people are more productive working from home. They don't have to commute and clog up freeways, they don't have to worry about a work uniform or what they're going to do for lunch from the office.

Some jobs require being physically there. No one would expect a car mechanic to work remotely. But for many many jobs, working from home is ideal.

I didn't invent the data. Look it up yourself before you argue further.
There are just as many studies showing people are more productive at the office… as many (including myself) have already posted here, this isn’t black or white. It depends on the company - and in the end, it’s the boss(es) of the company who get the final say…
 
Wow those are all such horrible things! Putting on some clothes and driving and getting some food for lunch? I had no clue these things were killing my productivity at work. I returned to these things after I left California because the government there thought it was harmful to work in person together. Now I know it’s just unproductive according to bogus studies.

To be honest, working fully remote was depressing as hell and THAT killed productivity. Everyone knows this is what happened, and similarly children’s education also suffered tremendously. Did they include that in your uncited studies?

Until you realize the getting ready + travel 2-4 hours a day amounts to 520-1048 hours a year or 22-42 full days(!!) of personal time you wasted.

That is 2-4 more time that you typically get as annual leave in the US.

I worked at my previous company for 6 years and I've seen 100~ different people come and go in my department. Of all those people I'm still in contact with about 4 of them, of those I think only 1 is actually valuable as a contact.

We worked remote full-time during covid, and despite the mess during the beginning as systems were not working optimally, we had better performances all-round by a large margin in those 2 years. Every KPI we had better results in, then we returned to the office for 2 days a week and all those KPI's plummeted noticeably on 2 very specific days, can you guess which?

People were less motivated, people were were less productive and were messing around more by being "social" or basically gossip the entire day while looking at the clock.

People would also call in sick more easily, because looking like a zombie is not the way people want to see you at the office, while working at home people just continued working instead of requesting sick leave.

People were now more focused on their work times, whereas while working fully at home some including me would do some small tasks outside working hours or worked longer hours without extra pay.

If anything going back to the office made things worse, and I'm sorry but water cooler gossip is not my thing. I work to make money, and I want to do my job properly. I'm not there to give you a shallow pat on the back because it's socially acceptable or to keep up appearances. If you need human contact join a club or something outside work.

It feels a waste of time to me if work is not done or people (inadvertently) waste a lot of time on gossip.
 
Until you realize the getting ready + travel 2-4 hours a day amounts to 520-1048 hours a year or 22-42 full days(!!) of personal time you wasted.

That is 2-4 more time that you typically get as annual leave in the US.

I worked at my previous company for 6 years and I've seen 100~ different people come and go in my department. Of all those people I'm still in contact with about 4 of them, of those I think only 1 is actually valuable as a contact.

We worked remote full-time during covid, and despite the mess during the beginning as systems were not working optimally, we had better performances all-round by a large margin in those 2 years. Every KPI we had better results in, then we returned to the office for 2 days a week and all those KPI's plummeted noticeably on 2 very specific days, can you guess which?

People were less motivated, people were were less productive and were messing around more by being "social" or basically gossip the entire day while looking at the clock.

People would also call in sick more easily, because looking like a zombie is not the way people want to see you at the office, while working at home people just continued working instead of requesting sick leave.

People were now more focused on their work times, whereas while working fully at home some including me would do some small tasks outside working hours or worked longer hours without extra pay.

If anything going back to the office made things worse, and I'm sorry but water cooler gossip is not my thing. I work to make money, and I want to do my job properly. I'm not there to give you a shallow pat on the back because it's socially acceptable or to keep up appearances. If you need human contact join a club or something outside work.

It feels a waste of time to me if work is not done or people (inadvertently) waste a lot of time on gossip.
Nice anecdote! But some of us aren’t like you where we want to talk to nobody unless we see them as valuable. Like I said, working fully remote is depressing as hell.

Getting ready in the mornings is something we all need to do, regardless of going to work unless you want to never leave the house. And how close your job is to your home or vice versa is a personal decision. It’s never taken me more than 30 minutes to drive to work, and personally I chosen to live within walking distance of work.
 
There are just as many studies showing people are more productive at the office… as many (including myself) have already posted here, this isn’t black or white. It depends on the company - and in the end, it’s the boss(es) of the company who get the final say…
No, there are not a bunch of studies showing both ways.

Studies show that generally for jobs that can be done from home people are more productive that way. Your comment was just hot air you made up off the top of your head.
 
With the number of articles relating to this I can tell that it is of critical importance to the well being being of the USA

Great job, good for you. You're so sharp and your comments contribute so greatly to the overall conversation.
 
No, there are not a bunch of studies showing both ways.

Studies show that generally for jobs that can be done from home people are more productive that way. Your comment was just hot air you made up off the top of your head.

And a simple Google search will find plenty more…

I'd also like to point out that I supplied EVIDENCE for what I stated... you provided nothing - other than to insult me.
 
Last edited:
No it's about team cohesion is simple fact you can work from home all day long but you're now a unit of one instead of a member of a team individual productivity may go up but overall team productivity usually goes down these studies are only focusing on individual productivity.

It's time to bring people back into the office teamwork makes a dream working right now you don't get that in a remote setting. Of course if you don't like it go start your own business there's always the option.
There are just as many studies showing people are more productive at the office… as many (including myself) have already posted here, this isn’t black or white. It depends on the company - and in the end, it’s the boss(es) of the company who get the final say…
It can depend on the type of business we are discussing.
In some teamwork is valuable, and others it is not important to be shoulder to shoulder.
 

And a simple Google search will find plenty more…

I'd also like to point out that I supplied EVIDENCE for what I stated... you provided nothing - other than to insult me.
The US government disagrees:

You can find the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) study on remote work and productivity here: https://www.bls.gov/productivity/notices/2024/productivity-and-remote-work.htm

It explores the relationship between total factor productivity (TFP) and remote work, showing a positive correlation between the two. The study found that a 1 percentage-point increase in remote workers was associated with a 0.08 percentage-point increase in TFP growth.

This information is more up to date and reliable than your sources, and your out of date sources note that even when workers productivity is less, the cost savings for the company overall outweighs any loss in productivity. Or in other works, companies can afford to hire more workers if they don't have to pay rent in an office building and that makes up for any gap in productivity.


From your sources:

"the Stanford paper points out that organizations might opt for a fully remote setup because, even after the drop in productivity, it can save money. Fully remote employees who do not require office space are cheaper, and they can be hired nationally or internationally"

"Raj Choudhury's (associate professor at Harvard Business School) research found that employees who worked in person 25% of the time were the most productive, he said, more than employees who worked more or fewer days in person.


So at best, companies that really want to maximize productivity would have to ask if paying rent in an office building is worth it to have employees come in 1 out of every 4 days. I think most companies would conclude it's not.

With that said, all of your sources are from 2023, and arguably business were still trying to figure out the best way to rebound from COVID norms and that in and of itself likely caused some productivity loss.

Here is a source from 2025 that says the opposite of your sources:

Here is another one:

the shift in findings likely comes from evolving workplace dynamics and improved remote collaboration tools. In 2023, many studies found that fully remote work led to communication challenges, weaker mentoring, and lower engagement, which hurt productivity. However, by 2025, companies had adapted; investing in better virtual collaboration tools, structured hybrid models, and AI-driven workflow optimization.

Additionally, early remote work studies often focused on short-term disruptions from the pandemic, while newer research examines long-term trends. As businesses refined their strategies, productivity stabilized, especially in hybrid work models.

Additionally, in populated areas remote workers make up ~30% of the work force. I don't know when the last time you drove in rush hour was, but how do you think dumping 30% more cars on the road is going to impact productivity?

Source: https://www.roberthalf.com/us/en/insights/research/remote-work-statistics-and-trends

And a simple Google search will find plenty more…

I'd also like to point out that I supplied EVIDENCE for what I stated... you provided nothing - other outdated and cherry-picked articles that you didn't even read.

Please don't bother me further with this if you're going to continue to argue from a place of disingenuous bias for a preferential outcome. The facts are on my side of the argument and in the end that is all that matters. I'm not going to run out of facts before you run out of steam, I promise.
 
Last edited:
Great job, good for you. You're so sharp and your comments contribute so greatly to the overall conversation.
I am sharp and my comments, while not always great, show I have a deep understanding of culture. Click the follow and like buttons
 
I am sharp and my comments, while not always great, show I have a deep understanding of culture. Click the follow and like buttons
Oh yes, such a good job. Really really well done.

I knew this guy once that said the dumbest things all the time. So dumb, all you could do was roll your eyes and wonder how someone so febbel minded was able to use a keyboard.

You don't remind me of that at all. We're just all so greatful for your wonderful insight.
 
Back