Perhaps you should learn the definition of "benefits".Well, duh, obviously. The reason I put that sentence in maniacal hysterical form is because this whole thing IS now maniacal hysterical. With some truth because as far as I can see, those who are hysterical about this planet future are those who either explicitly say they won't procreate, or behaviourally showing the lack of such drive.
Nice accusation. What IF I accuse those who push this agenda as hard as they could as the candlebearer to big tech, big media, big government? Or possibly CCP agent since China is the ultimate beneficiary of all "green tech" products and supply chains? Everyone can play this easy lazy game.
And while you are not paying attention, this https://www.iqair.com/china/beijingThe steady infiltration into the political viewpoint will be by all the voters of mediocre incomes who are paying an ever increasing price for energy, in part due to inflation, but also environmental policies. Environmental polices that limit the extraction and use of fossil fuels makes people poorer. Much of the world has yet to benefit from the cheap, reliable, transportable, high concentrated form of energy that brainwashed morons out to "save the planet" have benefited from their entire lives and are STILL benefiting from. And China is building ever more coal fired power stations. At least the CCP got one thing right in its otherwise atrocious existence.
Nice deflection. As in, you saw how obviously you missed itAnd another OMG moment ripe with the inability to understand the main driver in the article. In case you cannot figure that out properly, its humanity and humanity's "advancement."
and can't admit that you didn't do the due diligence before sending the reply lolAnd where does [novel entities] appear in the article?
Everyone uses 50, 100, 150 years of "data" to show the Earth is heatin up due to "man made global warming". 50-200 years is NOTHING to the age of the Earth. It's been warmer, it's been colder. Should we be good stewards of this planet? Yes, but banning this and that in hopes it will "change the climate" is nonsense for a few reasons. 1. Not ALL countries are banning fossil fuels (ie: China, India among a few) 2. One good pop from a mid size volcano will disrupt the climate more than man could (outside a global thermonuclear war). In 1815, a mid sized volcano blew its cork in present day Indonesia. The output affected the global temperatures that in 1816, it was known as the year without summer. It's also believed to be part of the cause of the Irish potato crisis, and an outbreak of virus/disease in the southern Europe area.Is the data incorrect ? Do you have other findings of your own ?
Great country, built on slave labor and land appropriation.
Fell behind how ? We at least have working healthcare system. Last 12 months I had a tumor removal surgery, a few dozen of proton theraphy sessions, 8 months of PCV complimentary chemo, all in a city 100 miles away. All paid with my taxes, including accomodation in a hostel for all the complimentary treatments. If I had to rely on private insurance, I'd get next to nothing as they would probably dismiss it as genetic I was told by insurance rep. And I was still paid 80% of my salary the entire year.
and what would those things be exactly ?you are still a member of the modern group of people that did those things to your country
Aha, I'd get the same things, or even better ones, except I'd be either dead or broke/in debt for the rest of my life.I'm in a different bracket, but overall the same things you do, just better!
Except healthcare coverage!
Spot on.Oh, look the private jets and luxury yachts club has another report on why we should give up all our freedoms and luxuries and give them the power to make decisions over every aspect of our lives. Nothing at all suspicious about that, they're really just good people trying to save the planet. Just because the plans give them an extreme amount of power over our lives while also making their ventures more lucrative for them is definitely not something we should be concerned with.
and what would those things be exactly ?
Aha, I'd get the same things, or even better ones, except I'd be either dead or broke/in debt for the rest of my life.
"YEAH! HE says things like I say!!"no kidding; just virtue signaling propaganda at this point
You just aren't paying attention. Again. Since we are all aware of the connection between carbon dioxide and temps, it is very self-explanatory. And please, ask me for more.Everyone uses 50, 100, 150 years of "data" to show the Earth is heatin up due to "man made global warming".
It appears on the chart. I didn't see any mention of it in the article is why I was asking. I only see the term used on the chart.And where does that term appear in the article? I think the article is clear in stating what the conditions are and what is causing those conditions.
That's what happens when real concerns are brought to the forefront and everyone keeps doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results regardless of right on the chart.
And where does that term appear in the article? I think the article is clear in stating what the conditions are and what is causing those conditions.
That's what happens when real concerns are brought to the forefront and everyone keeps doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results regardless of the concerns.
Why not extend the x-axis back even further? Say 400 mln years or so.It's the American way!
Well, for a few. We all get from a young age what the deal is.
Sink or swim. It works.
"YEAH! HE says things like I say!!"
Except the problem with you is you can't see that in that 60 years things have gotten much, much worse. Blind and deaf, what a way to "live".
You just aren't paying attention. Again. Since we are all aware of the connection between carbon dioxide and temps, it is very self-explanatory. And please, ask me for more.
Because it still warrants complaining about and further action. Even the DoD considers climate change a national security priority: https://www.defense.gov/spotlights/tackling-the-climate-crisis/ If you can't handle it, go back to watching Charlie Brown.Good grief! They've been complaining about this for 60 years!
Interesting you use "The boy who cried wolf" since deniers are the lazy nonbelievers.
And things have gotten much, much worse in those years.The climate hysterics have been "sounding the alarm" for fifty years
We agree there. We are solely responsible for probably the worst serial killer.I'm in favor of not setting petroleum on fire, as there are much better uses for it.
I have a long history of being pro nuke.In the meantime, any climate change activist that doesn't support nuclear power