EU strikes deal on new payment rules that force providers to refund fraud losses and reveal hidden fees

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,511   +934
Staff
The takeaway: The European Parliament and Council have agreed on a set of significant changes to how online payments and payment services must operate. The new measures aim to strengthen user protection against both fraud and hidden fees associated with online transactions – and that's only the beginning.

European authorities have completed the negotiation phase for the Payment Services Regulation and the Third Payment Services Directive, two new regulatory frameworks designed to improve user protection and transparency in online payments. The rules aim to harmonize and modernize how payment service providers operate across the European Union, covering payment services offered by banks, post-office giro systems, and other financial institutions.

The primary focus of the new regulations is stronger consumer protection against online fraud, the European Parliament said. If a PSP fails to implement "appropriate" anti-fraud mechanisms, it will be required to reimburse customers for any resulting financial losses. PSPs will also be obligated to perform additional checks on a payee's identity and refuse payments when inconsistencies or risks are detected.

Suspicious transactions must be blocked as well, according to the Parliament. A PSP may also be required to refund the full amount lost by a customer if the customer reports the fraud both to law enforcement and to the PSP. In line with provisions of the Digital Services Act, large online platforms could also face consequences from PSPs if they fail to remove fraudulent content hosted on their services.

European authorities are additionally seeking to improve pricing transparency, requiring PSPs to disclose all fees before a transaction begins. Information that should soon be more clearly communicated includes currency-conversion rates for international payments and fixed fees for ATM cash withdrawals.

Speaking of cash, Europe also wants to ensure that customers have better access to payment methods in rural or underserved areas. People should soon have the option to withdraw small sums – €100 to €150 – at retail stores, with no requirement to purchase anything in order to get the money.

Could these new rules create additional bureaucratic burdens for PSPs and online banks? The EU's elected body believes they will not. The agreement with the European Council is designed to reduce market barriers for "open banking services," such as account information providers and payment initiation services.

Banks and other financial institutions will no longer be allowed to "discriminate" against these services, improving access to payment data. Payment authorization procedures will also be simplified, the Parliament said. If a consumer chooses to pursue an "alternative" dispute resolution process, PSPs will be required to comply.

René Repasi, a German MEP who worked on the PSR, said that "consumers will benefit from new, harmonized rules on payment services regulation. Mandatory fraud-prevention measures will be applied and lead to less payment fraud. Banks have to share more of the burden if they fail to do their part."

Danish MEP Morten Løkkegaard remarked that the PSD3 directive will make the European digital market more resilient and open. Previous rules governing online payments had become outdated and required substantial updates.

Now that negotiations over the PSR and PSD3 are complete, the European Parliament and Council – Europe's main legislative bodies – will have to formally adopt the new rules before they can come into full effect.

Permalink to story:

 
This will be a bureaucratic nightmare for anything that sells online to be fair.

Instead of giving police access to those groups who obviously scam, or start taking META or Google into account for making over 16 billion a year on purely scam advertisements, no the websites that have nothing with scamming are being forced to another KYC program that will only provide more paperwork and stress whenever there is something unusual.

EU is incompetent of actually dealing with problems.
 
This will be a bureaucratic nightmare for anything that sells online to be fair.

Instead of giving police access to those groups who obviously scam, or start taking META or Google into account for making over 16 billion a year on purely scam advertisements, no the websites that have nothing with scamming are being forced to another KYC program that will only provide more paperwork and stress whenever there is something unusual.

EU is incompetent of actually dealing with problems.
This will help the online markets by improving fraud prevention, payment safety and transparency. The online markets don't need to do anything, this is on the banks and major payment processors to implement. Thanks for telling us that you didn't understand what this is about. In fact they'll be able to improve their services because banks can't discriminate anymore on what payment systems you can use/implement in your online store.

"Instead of giving police access to those groups who obviously scam" - the EU doesn't have "police", this is on the individual countries and their police force/justice system to pursue when fraud is declared. (aka you have to do your job too and give the police all info you can to help investigate)

For example, this was a collaborative effort: https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/news...t-eur-300-million-global-credit-card-fraud-18

"EU is incompetent of actually dealing with problems." - how and as opposed to what? doing absolutely nothing or worse yet, taking the side of banks and PSP instead of consumers, like in the US?
 
Last edited:
And along with new rules may come new fees added on since PSPs do charge a fee for their service. PSPs may just raise their fees to their clients which then the clients will pass the fees on to the consumers. But since it's an EU law, applicable fees may just be only in the EU. Just as credit card companies charges a fee to the merchant, the merchant passes the fees on to the consumers. It's all about money.
 
Last edited:
And along with new rules may come new fees added on since PSPs do charge a fee for their service. PSPs may just raise their fees to their clients which then the clients will pass the fees on to the consumers. But since it's an EU law, applicable fees may just be only in the EU. Just as credit card companies charges a fee to the merchant, the merchant passes the fees on to the consumers. It's all about money.
I don't get it.

All the fees are already included in the price you pay. The store calculates its profit margin based on all the taxes and operational fees. Nothing will change besides being able to see the fee during the payment process (kinda like we already see the value added tax VAT). The store already knows the fees before any sale is made (it's in the signed contract).

You could potentially be able to switch to a different payment processor with a lower fee, after checking them all, to support the store (or do the opposite if you don't like the store :D).

Anyway, the differences are generally fairly small since it is a competitive market and the non-discrimination rule is aimed at increasing competition even more.
 
Last edited:
Something something "too much regulation" something something "EU BAD" something something.
The law of unintended consequences.

Banks having to guarantee the safety of transactions for customers led to the constant war on side loading and rooting and bootloader unlocking. It's why a rooted device can't log onto any bank accounts.

So what will the consequence be here? You have to dox yourself to every customer perhaps?
 
The law of unintended consequences.

Banks having to guarantee the safety of transactions for customers led to the constant war on side loading and rooting and bootloader unlocking. It's why a rooted device can't log onto any bank accounts.

So what will the consequence be here? You have to dox yourself to every customer perhaps?
I didn't know refunds have "consequences" when fraud is detected.
 
Sometimes I like EU, sometimes I hate EU, but if this will force companies like Google (YT), Meta or any other company to force them to pay for damages, because of allowing fraud ads, I'm fully agree with it...

Also, we will see, how much we will like EU after vote for Chat Control 2.0 next year in April and what happen to Stop Killing Games ;-)
 
Back