Farewell, RTX 3060: Nvidia is discontinuing the most popular graphics card on the Steam survey

midian182

Posts: 11,721   +177
Staff member
What just happened? The RTX 3060, a graphics card so popular with gamers that it has topped the Steam survey charts since September 2023, is no more. Just over three years after it launched, Nvidia is preparing to distribute the final batches of GA106 graphics processors that power the mid-range Ampere model.

Launched in February 2021, we liked the RTX 3060, but a performance that didn't match the $329 MSRP, especially compared to the RTX 3060 Ti, meant we didn't love it at the time. As such, we awarded the card a good if not great score of 75.

But Nvidia's mid-range xx60 series has always been popular, and the RTX 3060 has been finding its way into more gamers PCs as the years passed and the prices fell. In September 2023, it unseated the GTX 1650 at the top of the Steam Hardware and Software survey. It's still there today, found in 5.88% of participants' machines. It's not showing signs of slowing down, either – the RTX 3060's user share increased 0.22% last month, making it the fourth-best performer during July.

Unfortunately, the RTX 3060 might not experience many more months where its Steam user share increases significantly. According to reports from Board Channels (via VideoCardz), Nvidia has announced the discontinuation of the card's production and notified all AIC brands to plan the final supply order. The last remaining batches of GA106 GPUs will be the final ones.

The 3060's successor, the RTX 4060, did have the advantage of launching with an MSRP $30 lower than its predecessor, but cutting the VRAM down from 12GB to 8GB, along with the reduced bus width and memory bandwidth, didn't win the card many fans at launch. It still outperforms the 3060, of course, especially at 1080p and in terms of Cost per Frame. We awarded it a score of 70, five points lower than the RTX 3060 managed two years earlier.

Despite having less VRAM, the RTX 4060 could eventually prove just as popular as the RTX 3060. It was the best-performing card among Steam survey participants last month, up 0.45%, and currently sits in fifth position overall with a 3.47% total share. Killing off the RTX 3060 will likely give the RTX 4060 a sales boost, too.

Permalink to story:

 
Not a bad little card. Ran 7D2D for me without any issues - was probably the most played game I was into at the time when I used the card for about 6 months. I moved up from my 980Ti to the 3060, not because I wanted to make that move, but because the 980Ti was having some issues and I needed something; the 3060 being the only card I could get my hands on at retail price during the whole massive crypto GPU shortage at the time.

My 980Ti was using upwards of 5GB of VRAM for 7D2D. Moving to the 3060 let the game jump upwards into the 8GB range, according the MSI Afterburner overlay. I never had issues playing the game on my 980Ti, but the extra VRAM space to allocate resources for the game is a good thing I suppose.

The 4060 wasn't very impressive. It may have been able to outperform the 3060, but it fell behind the 3060Ti. Everyone was expecting 3060Ti or slightly better performance from the 4060 and when that didn't happen people were quick to snatch up the 3060Ti where they could get a better performing card with the same VRAM and just a slightly higher price tag at the time (3060Ti going for about $350 whereas the 4060 were going for $300).
 
Last edited:
RTX 3060ti is 200W . Absurd at that performance .

I thought the 3060Ti, with the performance it has over the 3060 was awesome at 200W. The 3060's performance and the power it draws (180W) is pretty sad. I'd rather get a 3060Ti that gives 25-35% performance gains over the 3060 for an extra 20W power draw.

Even if you're wanting to compare power draw of the 4060 (125W) to the 3060Ti (200W), I'd rather have that extra 75W power draw and pull 10-15% more performance. Because even after 100 hours (7.5kWh) of gaming that's only about a $0.90 price difference for me. Even if it was 1000 hours of gaming (75kWh) that's only about $9.00. A 1000 hours of gaming is a lot for me in a year, that would mean I have to put in at least 20 hours a week and I don't get that much free time for gaming a week, I'm lucky if I fit in 10 hours.

I'm not sure what bothers you about the performance or power draw of the 3060Ti. I think it's just a better, overall card than the 4060, even if it means it draws around 75W more when gaming.
 
RTX 3060ti , no way . modest performance , 200W and 8GB VRAM for over 404 bucks !!! I m no fool .
If you're looking at buying one in today's market, yes, you are a fool at $400 if you were to buy it.

When the 4060 launched the 3060Ti was only about $50 more (was sitting around $350). People laughed at the 4060 and 4060Ti cards, left them to collect dust on the shelves. 3060Ti was the smart buy at the time, but seeing as how they're no longer available your concerns or fears are moot.

I think it was a ploy by Nvidia to clear the shelves of the 3060Ti stock, pushing out a 4060 card that's slower, only costs about $50 less at the time (compared to the 3060Ti), has the same amount of VRAM....it was a good marketing move by Nvidia to clear out the 3060Ti stock since they no longer were producing them with the release of the 4060 and 4060Ti.

Whereas the 4060Ti came in at $50 over the 3060Ti price and only offered about a 5-10% performance gain with still only having 8GB of VRAM made it look like a piss poor choice.
 
RTX 4060 ti 8GB 160W 370 bucks - faster , more power efficient and far cheaper than RTX 3060 ti . RTX 3060ti is dead .
 
Back