"There was literally no reason Obama couldn't do what Trump did" - again with the freaking lies. Trump did jack squat. I even told you who did it, but you, as always, deflected and forgot/ignored. I even gave you the original link from 2018.
Trump's DOJ reversed the course of the Obama DOJ, reopened the case, and brought Epstein to justice. These are incontrovertible facts.
Trump hired Acosta to a position having nothing to do with law enforcement. And the moment the media stopped shielding Epstein so that Trump learned what Acosta had done-- Trump fired him.
Trump listed a legal expense as a legal expense, in a case even New York's own Appeals Court called nothing but politically motivated, when they threw out any penalty being leveled against him. And, unlike yourself, I haven't tried defending Romania's fascist government which -- as SDNY did to Trump -- trumped up false charges against a politician, to overthrow election results they didn't like. But then, unlike you, I'm not a big fan of fascism.
Epstein the guy that was blackmailing countless powerful people "killed himself" right after all the cameras in his cell went out. Sure.
There are no cameras in prison cells. There are cameras in hallways, and many at this facility were malfunctioning ... but had been doing so for nearly two full weeks before Epstein killed himself. But by all means, keep to your conspiracy theories. Perhaps Trump himself snuck in and offed him, eh?
As I stated earlier, every person accused in the US is either dead or in prison. The sole person accused and still walking free is Prince Andrew, in the UK.
Oops! Trump's DOJ tried, but an Obama-appointed judge refused to unseal the files. Facts matter. In fact, Trump's DOJ didn't just try once, but three separate times. And three different judges said no.
You really just lap up the propaganda.
I can't quite parse that word salad, but the real crime here is how easily the media gaslights gullible individuals like yourself into blindly gulping down their narrative ... no matter how often or how absurdly that narrative changes. From 2021-24, they convinced you there was 'nothing to see here' in the Epstein files. But the moment Trump steps in office, suddenly the narrative changes and lo! you're immediately concerned about "DOJ inaction!"
As anyone who read the actual indictments knows, the vast majority of those women were abused by Epstein himself. So far there's only ONE victim who said she was raped by someone other than Epstein -- and that was Virginia Guiffree, and her attacker was Prince Andrew ... presently enjoying criminal immunity, thanks to the British government.
Trump didn't do ANYTHING and the ones who did were the journalists who forced the DOJ's hand with new evidence and with victims coming out against Epstein. As per the link I gave you which started it all. I guess you were too young to remember huge backlash the DOJ and Acosta got back then and the public outrage that started it all.
You mean the journalists who killed story after Epstein story for a full eight years, to help protect Hillary's chances at the presidency?
Oops again! There was no no "new evidence" nor "new victims". All the illegal activity occurred 2003-2008, and -- as we know from the released files -- was already in the DOJ's possession in 2008.
Based on political pressure to protect the Clintons. Now answer the question: why did SDNY -- the federal district that had priority jurisdiction, the district where Clinton was a sitting Senator -- refuse to even prosecute Epstein? As abusive as Acosta being forced by political pressure to offer a plea deal was, it at least put a halt to any further offenses by Epstein. Had the Clinton's pressure on him worked as well as it did on SDNY, he would have dropped the case entirely.
Then why did you fabricate false charges against a political opponent, so you could throw out election results you didn't agree with? Romania grows more fascist by the day, sad to say.
The ones who "killed" it were the GOP, the people you are defending. The only thing you know to do in this situation is to deflect and ignore reality.
That would be absurdly, ludicrously false. The mainstream media -- as far Left an institution as possibly exists -- killed story after Epstein story:
Ah yes, the one interview that paints the whole media black in your mind. As if ABC is the only new channel in the world. Again with these fake stories full of lies you keep weaving. Where was Fox? The only channel you watch.That would be absurdly, ludicrously false. The mainstream media -- as far Left an institution as possibly exists -- killed story after Epstein story:
"...In a leaked video posted Tuesday, ABC news anchor Amy Robach expresses her frustration to a colleague over ABC's failure to broadcast her interview with a key accuser of Epstein.
Robach complains that the network "quashed" her interview, suggesting that ABC had yielded to threats from powerful forces...
"I've had the story for three years," Robach says in the video. "We would not put it on the air. Um, first of all, I was told, 'Who was Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows who that is. This is a stupid story.' Then the palace found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us..."
Robach goes on to say that Giuffre alluded to others in the interview, including former President Bill Clinton, Harvard University law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz and Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell..."
Stop being intentionally obtuse. The "original case" was in Florida -- rather than where Epstein actually lived and committed the majority of his crimes -- because New York's far Left SDNY refused to take the case, even after being repeatedly notified by Palm Beach PD of crimes occurring in NYC.
It was a cooked up set of charges, which even Germany's DW called "highly irregular". Georgescu's campaign received zero foreign funds. Plenty of people spent money to post on TikTik to support him (as others did for the other candidates) but none had any direct connection or coordination with him.
www.rferl.org
When US Democrats found out that Joe Biden had showered with his own underage daughter until she turned age 14 -- which in her diary she blames the "highly inappropriate" acts there for her life-long psychological issues -- they asked him to run for President.
Criminal charges are public record in the US, and every major media outlet in the country employs people to scan them. Epstein's charges -- and the favorable treatment he received -- were known to the entire media establishment. Some no-name actor from 30 years earlier or an ex-Mayor of a tiny rural town can be arrested for DUI, and the AP wire will have the story within hours.
Pfff hahahahaha. You just embarrassed yourself with these articles on GeorgescuStop being intentionally obtuse. The "original case" was in Florida -- rather than where Epstein actually lived and committed the majority of his crimes -- because New York's far Left SDNY refused to take the case, even after being repeatedly notified by Palm Beach PD of crimes occurring in NYC.
Acosta was the only federal prosecutor in the country willing to take the case ... and he came under immediate fire from Clinton allies when he did so.
It was a cooked up set of charged, which even Germany's DW called "highly irregular". Georgescu's campaign received zero foreign funds. Plenty of eople spent money to post on TikTik to support him (as others did for the other candidates) but none had any direct connection or coordination with him.
Romania's 'King Of TikTok' Tied To Alleged Scheme Boosting Far-Right Presidential Candidate
A mysterious programmer with a reputation for a lavish lifestyle has emerged as a central figure in the claims that far-right presidential candidate Calin Georgescu benefited from secretive influence campaigns, including from Russia.
After Romania's stormtroopers used the "illegal campaign funding" excuse to overthrow the election, they realized they could prove no such charge against Georgescu. They then switched gears, charging him with "hate speech", "spreading false information", and actions to "overthrow the constitutional order" ... based on his public statements after they already annnuled the election results.
As DW states:
"...the way that Romania's government and judicial system have handled the recent presidential election has been full of irregularities. For example, one far-right presidential candidate was excluded from the race entirely for publicly sympathizing with the same orthodox, nationalist Iron Guard as Georgescu had. But for reasons unknown, he was permitted to stay in the race...
Leading up to the race, Georgescu was polling in single digits, but surprisingly won the first round with 23% of the popular vote. This sudden rise in popularity was apparently thanks to his rising fame on the social media platform TikTok.
The constitutional court did not contest the results of the first election round, but instead cancelled the run-off election, citing intelligence that indicated Georgescu had received illegal election financing and was ostensibly being backed by Russia. While evidence is available to back this first claim, none supports the latter accusation....
But it seems implausible that Romania's secret service would only have uncovered Georgescu's clandestine dealings after the first round of elections and shortly before the run-off. To a large part of the public, it simply appeared as if Romania's political elite had feared that the "wrong" candidate would win...."
Afterward this article was published, we learned that Georgescu had NOT received illegal financing, and Romania's government could produce no evidence of such, merely that he had "benefitted" from the actions of others.
)
Criminal charges are public record in the US, and every major media outlet in the country employs people to scan them. Epstein's charges -- and the favorable treatment he received -- were known to the entire media establishment. Some no-name actor from 30 years earlier or an ex-Mayor of a tiny rural town can be arrested for DUI, and the AP wire will have the story within hours.
That is, in fact, how ABC learned of Virginia Guiffree and why Amy Robach chose to interview her. Other media outlets suppressed reporting the Epstein story even earlier. Why? Because of photos like this, of "certain people" in Epstein's hot tub:
My statement was correct. People spent money to support Georgescu, as other people did other Presidential candidates. I myself saw quite a few social media posts explictly from foreign politicians and celebrities supporting Georgescu's opponents and castigating him -- foreign influence without a doubt. But no money was given to or used by the Georgescu campaign. He broke no campaign finance laws ... which is why not even Romania's stormtroopers tried him for such. Instead, all his charges are based on statements he made after they cancelled the election results. If they had actual evidence of an election crime, they would have charged him with such.
Perpetually reiterating disinformation doesn't make it true. The true source of Epstein's crimes lay with SDNY, the far-Left district that was originally notified of Epstein's crime and that which began the investigation. When they refused to prosecute Epstein (under pressure from the Clintons), Acosta in Florida picked it up .. and encountered the same pressure.
It's also funny, how these people who label other people for their first amendment rights per the US Constitution.
