FBI admits to buying location data of US citizens without a warrant

[AlaskaGuy]

I'm curious if you know that regardless of people like you spreading this bullshit all over the internet, have any of you not noticed that of over 1000 insurrectionist traitors arrested, and 400 convicted so far, not one of them claimed the FBI had anything to do with their actions?

Please save it for your friends that wrap themselves in aluminum foil and duct tape.

You know those thousands of hours of video footage that the Jan 6 committee refused to release ... well we saw it. btw how many did Stalin convict?

Moscow trials - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[scavengerspc]

You know those thousands of hours of video footage that the Jan 6 committee refused to release ... well we saw it. btw how many did Stalin convict?

Moscow trials - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

By falsifying his "proof"? Like your heroes on fox prime-time, and Russia I guess.
Liars, thieves and grifters. And you sir, are a sucker.

You people prefer the Friday the 13th movie with only the beach scenes. That's your problem.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

By falsifying his "proof"? Like your heroes on fox prime-time, and Russia I guess.
Liars, thieves and grifters. And you sir, are a sucker.

You people prefer the Friday the 13th movie with only the beach scenes. That's your problem.

Allowing the public along with the defense attorney's is termed 'falsifying' these days? Who would have thunk. Fact of the matter is the defense attorney's weren't even allowed access to the video footage until Congressman McCarthy stepped in and allowed them access to all the video footage. Why wouldn't the Jan 6 committee allow everyone to view that video footage including the defendant's attorney's unless they had something to hide.

 

[scavengerspc]

Allowing the public along with the defense attorney's is termed 'falsifying' these days? Who would have thunk. Fact of the matter is the defense attorney's weren't even allowed access to the video footage until Congressman McCarthy stepped in and allowed them access to all the video footage. Why wouldn't the Jan 6 committee allow everyone to view that video footage including the defendant's attorney's unless they had something to hide.

Because nobody doubted for a moment that there were non-violent members of that mob.
Not to mention that it is still evidence. Maybe they were afraid some loser would take it, remove all the violent scenes and then try to present that as proof that it was peaceful.... Wait

Or that once that video was made a whole buch of suckers and liars would start presenting it exactly as such.... Wait

By the way. I have proof that there was never a violent moment at a "BLM" protest.

See? Now I have proof that there were not then, or ever, violent destructive protests blocks from there. You Have Seen The Proof Now! You must be itching to spread this all over the internet!

So seriously. What do you think Tucks video shows? Beyond Fox's poor editing skills?

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Because nobody doubted for a moment that there were non-violent members of that mob.
Not to mention that it is still evidence. Maybe they were afraid some loser would take it, remove all the violent scenes and then try to present that as proof that it was peaceful.... Wait

Or that once that video was made a whole buch of suckers and liars would start presenting it exactly as such.... Wait

By the way. I have proof that there was never a violent moment at a "BLM" protest.

See? Now I have proof that there were not then, or ever, violent destructive protests blocks from there. You Have Seen The Proof Now! You must be itching to spread this all over the internet!

Again why did the Jan 6 committee refuse to allow the defendant's attorney's access to those tapes?

 

[scavengerspc]

Again why did the Jan 6 committee refuse to allow the defendant's attorney's access to those tapes?

I'm going to think it's a rhetorical question, since the answer to that easily answered question is because they were concerned it could compromise Capitol security. I don't buy it completely, but then I'm very happy with the results. Traitors went down and will continue to do so.

So again. Can you now see that I have proven that there were no violent protests by "BLM"?
I PROVED IT!! How can it not be valid?

 

[AlaskaGuy]

I'm going to think it's a rhetorical question, since the answer to that easily answered question is because they were concerned it could compromise Capitol security. I don't buy it completely, but then I'm very happy with the results. Traitors went down and will continue to do so.

So again. Can you now see that I have proven that there were no violent protests by "BLM"?
I PROVED IT!! How can it not be valid?

And that is a lie. btw this is the only such Congressional committee in the history of the USA that the opposing party wasn't allowed to choose it's own committee members. Go figure eh.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1633974714203865089

 

[godrilla]

And that is a lie. btw this is the only such Congressional committee in the history of the USA that the opposing party wasn't allowed to choose it's own committee members. Go figure eh.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1633974714203865089

Remember when I said who needs conspiracy theories when the FBI is just that sloppy?

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Remember when I said who needs conspiracy theories when the FBI is just that sloppy?

The FBI needs to be disbanded. The left has weaponized these govt. agencies into nothing shy of the Soviet NKVD.

 

[scavengerspc]

And that is a lie. btw this is the only such Congressional committee in the history of the USA that the opposing party wasn't allowed to choose it's own committee members. Go figure eh.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1633974714203865089

Eh. Like I said, I don't even buy into it completely, but the results were glorious.
I promise I will, ok might, look into it closer, and maybe even watch your video, but I really don't care. I like the results.

The FBI needs to be disbanded. The left has weaponized these govt. agencies into nothing shy of the Soviet NKVD.

Don't bother. Like all CONServative endeavors, it will fail. It's what you people do.
Besides, someday you all will get another Jim Comey moment and will love the FBI again.

Myself? I'm still too busy hating the J6 traitors to truly worry about how those Duck Dynasty snowflakes are being treated. So again, results.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

Eh. Like I said, I don't even buy into it completely, but the results were glorious.
I promise I will, ok might, look into it closer, and maybe even watch your video, but I really don't care. I like the results.



Don't bother. Like all CONServative endeavors, it will fail. It's what you people do.
Besides, someday you all will get another Jim Comey moment and will love the FBI again.

Myself? I'm still too busy hating the J6 traitors to truly worry about how those Duck Dynasty snowflakes are being treated. So again, results.

This is why I don't believe you're an American. If I had to guess I'd say you were either a ChiCom or North Korean for the fact no American could honestly be content with US citizens not getting a fair trial. As an American myself I had to take a US history / Civics class in high school which was mandatory across the country and we learned about the US Constitution along with the Bill of Rights. Those are the inalienable rights I helped to protect during my time in the military.

 

[Bullwinkle M]

Do you have a point to make or are you just trolling? The folks at Sephora who had to pay a $1.2M fine might not be laughing as hard as you.

Opting out does not stop the Corporations or the Government from continuing to commit crimes against the people

Who actually believes opting out is a valid option?