The UN and human rights organizations are getting involved. This is now an international incident. Hundreds of thousands of people, and most likely soon to be millions, of players are jumping ship on blizzard.
Blizzard is trying to censor the largest protests for human rights in modern history. Their statement of banning a playing for supporting Hong Kong to "protect a country's dignity" is not really open to interpretation.
Why are you doubling down on this? I want to put this in perspective for you. If China starts murdering Hong Kong protestors(and they murder their citizens all the time) it could create a humanitarian crisis that causes the next world war.
This isn't a joke, this isn't something to be boiled down as a matter of opinion on an internet forum. This is an international human rights incident
No, we're incapable of understanding why you're ignoring evidence in order to save face
1) No source, I don't care what you have to say about the UN. Don't BS me with stuff I can't look up for myself. And I don't care if many people are "jumping ship" based on feelings, not facts.
2) They do not need to support an unsolicited message on their platform and it doesn't mean they are for/against the issue. Period (I don't care how inconvenient that fact is for you).
3) I am against what China is doing to their citizens, and haven't said anything to the contrary. Using a strawman argument just proves you don't know how to debate this topic.
4) Blizzard bans are separate to what the official said on weibo. What is there not to get about that? That is the only bit of "evidence" you've given to say Blizzard is picking a political side in this. And it's wrong.
4a) So let me lay this out like I would for a child:
The official who made the tweet lives in China. China doesn't have free speech. China harms citizens who don't support the government. If the official didn't say something, he'd have to fear for his life. If the official said something and didn't support the gov't, he'd have to fear for his life. So instead the official said something and supported the gov't, which means he probably doesn't have to fear for his life.
What's not to get about that simple bit of logic? I shouldn't have needed to spell that out. Blizzard wouldn't have demanded the response, the guy would make the response to save his own skin from the gov't (and Blizzard officials can't speak out on it also because safety). So as I said, separate issue.
But I'm now done using logic against your misguided opinions for you too.