User of ATI graphics since early 2000s
A few things were always making me go to ATI:
*better performance at the same price, especially after a few months from release (initially drivers were holdng them back)
*driver updates tended to brick the system. Using DDU or whatever equivalent it was back then sometimes worked and allowed to update without introducing random issues
*best thing if a driver update was a must though, which in allhonesty was at best every other year, was to reimage the OS and clean install the new driver
Nothing said now is surprising. ATI/AMD driver update was always broken. TS is probably fine as they clean install, as you should. If the expectation is TO update often, maybe even encouraged by AMD, then they have a bad product.
FYI AMD cards are still cheaper in the EU than Nvidia equivalents for the most part
A few things were always making me go to ATI:
*better performance at the same price, especially after a few months from release (initially drivers were holdng them back)
*driver updates tended to brick the system. Using DDU or whatever equivalent it was back then sometimes worked and allowed to update without introducing random issues
*best thing if a driver update was a must though, which in allhonesty was at best every other year, was to reimage the OS and clean install the new driver
Nothing said now is surprising. ATI/AMD driver update was always broken. TS is probably fine as they clean install, as you should. If the expectation is TO update often, maybe even encouraged by AMD, then they have a bad product.
FYI AMD cards are still cheaper in the EU than Nvidia equivalents for the most part