Google and Epic Games reach settlement in long-running Play Store antitrust case

midian182

Posts: 11,747   +178
Staff member
What just happened? The long-running legal dispute between Epic Games and Google appears to be over after both companies agreed to a settlement. The agreement terms will see a number of long-lasting changes introduced to the Google Play Store globally, including giving consumers access to third-party stores and alternative payment systems, as well as lower fees for developers.

The deal follows years of litigation that began in 2020, when Epic sued Google for allegedly abusing its dominance in Android app distribution through the Play Store and its mandatory in-app billing system. Epic argued that Google's policies stifled competition and inflated costs for developers.

After a series of court losses, including a 2023 jury verdict that found Google maintained an illegal monopoly, a 2024 injunction forced the company to open its ecosystem to competition.

Under the new settlement, Google will launch a "Registered App Store" program that allows users to install third-party app stores with a single click, presented in neutral language rather than the security warnings that previously discouraged sideloading.

These stores will be treated as first-class citizens within Android, capable of offering their own app listings, updates, and purchase systems. According to The Verge, phone makers will be able to preinstall these alternative stores on devices without jeopardizing Android certification, potentially leading to phones that include multiple marketplaces out of the box.

Once registered, a third-party store can distribute apps directly, handle automatic updates, and access many of the same permissions granted to the Play Store. The changes are designed to make downloading from these stores as seamless and secure as Google's own platform.

Developers using the stores will also gain flexibility to implement alternative billing systems, with the option to offer lower prices if they process payments outside of Google Play Billing. Service fees could drop to as low as 9%, compared to the traditional 15 – 30% range, giving developers an incentive to adopt the new system.

The settlement also maintains restrictions from Judge James Donato's 2024 injunction, which prohibits Google from paying manufacturers, carriers, or developers for exclusivity deals that favor the Play Store. While Epic's original win applied only to the United States and lasted three years, the settlement's terms will be global and remain in effect until June 2032, making it one of the longest-running antitrust remedies ever imposed on a major tech platform.

Epic CEO Tim Sweeney described the outcome as "awesome," calling it a landmark victory for developers and consumers seeking more choice on Android. Google's Android president Sameer Samat said user safety would remain a top priority and noted that, if approved by the court, the deal would resolve all remaining litigation between the companies.

If approved, the settlement would mark a major evolution in the Android ecosystem, transforming what was once a tightly controlled marketplace into an open, competitive environment for the next decade. For developers, it could mean lower fees and new ways to reach users. For consumers, it promises a future where downloading apps on Android is no longer synonymous with the Play Store.

Permalink to story:

 
Hopefully this is good for F-Droid and other open/not-for-profit repos, and does not include a hidden way to neuter them as F-Droid has feared.

Please follow up with an article on this aspect as we need to keep the freedom/libre part of this in the public view.

We ARE fighting back!
 
Damn I wish I had deep enough pockets to sue Google over a contract I'd already signed and then win. Imagine the privilege the average person could enjoy! Alas we must litigate individually as poors.
 
Hopefully this is good for F-Droid and other open/not-for-profit repos, and does not include a hidden way to neuter them as F-Droid has feared.

Please follow up with an article on this aspect as we need to keep the freedom/libre part of this in the public view.

We ARE fighting back!
Yeah, I'm not sure though because the settlement still allows Google to charge for registration. There are also limits like this (copied from the Verge): "The details of how, when, and where Google would charge its fees are complicated, and depend on when the app was installed. The “new service fee model would apply to new installs,” Google spokesperson Dan Jackson tells The Verge, and the proposal suggests it would only apply to apps installed after October 2025.". So, would a game I installed years ago be able to take advantage of this? It would for new users, but what about existing? Presumably the app may need to ask its users to reinstall the app to do so. I'm not sure.

And a potential issue for F-droid is this bit: "If you use an alternative payment system, Google might still get a cut: “the Google Play store is free to assess service fees on transactions, including when developers elect to use alternative billing mechanisms,” the proposal reads. But it sounds like that may not happen in practice: “If the user chooses to pay through an alternative billing system, the developer pays no billing fee to Google,” Jackson tells The Verge."

As far as I can tell there's nothing stopping Google from requiring the verification process.

Either way this is progress, but until we get legislation like Europe's DMA in the states, I don't think we'll see true openness.
 
Back