G
Guest said:
matrix86: The point isn't that we can't still get to the information, the issue is that this is probably just the beginning of more to come... Maybe the 6000 new Google hires are going to be a part of a new censorship team?![]()
Guest said:
matrix86: The point isn't that we can't still get to the information, the issue is that this is probably just the beginning of more to come... Maybe the 6000 new Google hires are going to be a part of a new censorship team?
While more of a symbolic gesture than real censorship, I'm still finding this to be a slippery slope for Google to go down. Time will tell if the content industry puts pressure on them for more then just removing 'instant searches'.
Mizzou said:
While more of a symbolic gesture than real censorship, I'm still finding this to be a slippery slope for Google to go down. Time will tell if the content industry puts pressure on them for more then just removing 'instant searches'.
Basically, Google wants to play in the mobile sector and probably has aspirations beyond that; so they have to play ball with the content providers ... even though this is a token effort. They're not the first to cave on this issue and certainly won't be the last (IMO).