Hyundai plans to deploy humanoid robots by 2028, union warns of job losses

midian182

Posts: 11,747   +178
Staff member
A hot potato: The fear of generative AI taking office jobs has somewhat overshadowed the issue of robots replacing factory workers. But in Korea, Hyundai Motor's labor union has warned against the company's plans to use humanoid robots in its factories, saying it would bring a "huge employment shock."

Hyundai Motor Group showed off Boston Dynamics' Atlas robot at CES earlier this month. The company said it plans to build a factory capable of producing 30,000 robots annually by 2028 and to begin deploying humanoid robots at its Georgia plant that same year, with plans to roll them out across all global production sites.

As is usually the case after an organization announces it is embracing AI/robots, Hyundai's share price reached a record high following the news.

However, the company's labor union is far from pleased. It has accused Hyundai of trying to boost its profits and reduce its workforce through the use of automation.

"Under no circumstances will workers welcome the plan, as the robot deployment will bring a huge employment shock," the union said.

"The union warns that not a single robot can be deployed at worksites without an agreement between the union and management."

Regarding the threat to human jobs, Hyundai has toed the standard line about how Atlas will ease the physical burden on workers and carry out jobs that are potentially dangerous to humans.

But the union says the move is simply about increasing long-term profits at the cost of human jobs. The annual maintenance costs of a robot like Atlas are estimated to reach $9,500, far less than a typical worker's wages. Moreover, Robots don't require sick days, vacation time, rest, or lunch and bathroom breaks.

"This is a good excuse for capitalists who seek to maximize profits from a long-term viewpoint," the union said.

The union also slammed Hyundai over its plans to expand production overseas, including the US. The company said its Georgia factory ‍will reach annual production capacity of 500,000 vehicles by 2028 to meet rising demand in the US market.

In October, there were reports that Amazon aims to replace 600,000 of its US warehouse workers with robots. The New York Times wrote that Amazon's robotics team hopes to automate 75% of all operations at the company, thereby eliminating 160,000 positions that would have otherwise been required by 2027.

Amazon quickly responded to the report by promising, once again, that the robots would not replace workers. The claim may have held more weight had Amazon not used the announcement to also unveil two more factory robots designed to replace workers.

Permalink to story:

 
South Korea, huh, the country that legalized work weeks of 68 hours, and drove half population to alcoholism, depression and suicide. If you think they will do something for its own people - give it up! The way they treat people is not really better than in North Korea.
 
"It has accused Hyundai of trying to boost its profits and reduce its workforce through the use of automation."

Of course! There is NO reason to employ workers that cost more than a machine (over time including all costs). Otherwise, cars would be hand assembled, from hand crafted parts, as they are slowly pulled through the factory on a sled by men pulling ropes. Then sold to the elite few rich who could afford the extremely expensive and scarce product.

Unions would do better to take some of the dues and use them towards upskilling their workers rather than lavish union boss compensation for annually threatening strikes and donating to politicians.
 
The car business is low margin already; Hyundai is not going to end up increasing profit. They'll do one of three things:
- Reduce prices as they expand production.
- Reduce prices as competitors reduce prices from similar manufacturing improvements.
- Add more luxury features without needing to increase prices.

Notice how the article mentions nothing of employees, workers, or layoffs? They only talk about employment and jobs. That's because the turnover rate of assembly line workers is high enough that Hyundai won't have to lay anyone off. It's the same with Amazon; workers will not lose jobs, their old positions just won't be filled. Instead, fewer new ones will be created). Managing/maintaining robots will be a new, higher-skilled job than an assembly line worker that actually increases employee pay.

Ironically, it's only the union that stands to take a hit from this. As employment is reduced (again without layoffs), its revenue from union dues will suffer. Even though job safety will increase and employee compensation will increase, the union is against this move (classic union move). The union doesn't represent shareholders or consumers either, but pushing back against further automation will risk the company's future and will prevent reduced car prices/more luxury features for the same price.
 
Eh, I'm okay with this. Cars now are mostly uninspired adhesive sandwiches pretending to be smarphones with wheels on them so I think souless design deserves soulless assembly, for soulless profits.
 
We should band together and create a company that builds upper/middle management and CEO robots and see how they like be replaced and out of work.
 
It is a race, a race to replacing as many humans and possible. But that is not the finish line. A finish line is when they are amazingly efficient and can even lower prices on products. But vast majority would not be buying those things even at much better prices because they would simply have no means to due to lack of jobs.

I think this is a good time to build businesses that make luxurious items. More billionaires, less middle class.
 
Back