Well, like I said, I don't think the 800+ extra pins are there for no reason. Doesn't the "Threadripper" socket have something like 4000 puns?Highly unlikely that they need the extra pins and size. Even if they did, it is the case of the 'boy who cried wolf'; No one would believe them if they did as its what they've always done. If AMD can last multiple generations of CPU, then im sure 'the mighty, all wise, not out to money grab' Intel could do it.
Another AMD fanboi heard fromWhat Intel 14th gen core desktop proc will require most is a better redesign![]()
In reality, the percentage of customers who upgrade the CPU on an older motherboard is significantly under 1%, which makes the whole compatibility argument pointless.
I've been in the IT industry for 30 years, and neither me no anybody I know ever tried to upgrade the CPU. You buy MB + CPU together, don't care about some special cases.
In reality, the percentage of customers who upgrade the CPU on an older motherboard is significantly under 1%, which makes the whole compatibility argument pointless.
I've been in the IT industry for 30 years, and neither me no anybody I know ever tried to upgrade the CPU. You buy MB + CPU together, don't care about some special cases.
<p>It's unfortunate that Intel plans to change sockets\</p>
Attention: 2551 minus 1700 equals 8
But then again when Intel "finally" did release the Core 2 Duo E-6300, they damned near put AMD out of business
And I'd say the majority of you were tripping over yourselves to get one.
This is very wrong. We found half of all AM4 owners upgraded their CPU on the same board from over 40K votes.
Do not take it personal, this is for Intel team. Hope u get it.Another AMD fanboi heard from
In reality, the percentage of customers who upgrade the CPU on an older motherboard is significantly under 1%, which makes the whole compatibility argument pointless.
I've been in the IT industry for 30 years, and neither me no anybody I know ever tried to upgrade the CPU. You buy MB + CPU together, don't care about some special cases.
Actually it does. The simple facts of the matter are, that members of this community. are much more likely to upgrade a CPU, without changing the board, than a vast majority of the public at large. As an "uneducated guess" I would say that 30 or 50% of the AMD proponents here at Techspot are likely to upgrade a CPU in the same board, as opposed to a "zero in ten", probability in the public at large.This whole I've been in the IT undustry for 30 years doesn't make your credibility facts as a whole for the general masses.
Just because you or people you know don't do it doesn't mean it's a minoity thing or others doesn't. Plenty of people I know upgrades often on the same socket generation.
Actually it does. The simple facts of the matter are, that members of this community. are much more likely to upgrade a CPU, without changing the board, than a vast majority of the public at large. As an "uneducated guess" I would say that 30 or 50% of the AMD proponents here at Techspot are likely to upgrade a CPU in the same board, as opposed to a "zero in ten", probability in the public at large.
I've never changed a CPU in a system I've built. I pick out the parts, (that I can afford), assemble the system, and I'm done with it. Too many other things are happening in the industry, (DDR2 to DDR3 as one example), to worry about, or tinker with, replacing the CPU by itself.
The money I would have to spend on another CPU by itself, (IMO), is money better put toward upgrading the entire system. But then, I'm probably "atypical". Instead of having one incredibly formidable machine as "the god I pray to", I delegate different tasks to multiple lesser machines.
In reality, the percentage of customers who upgrade the CPU on an older motherboard is significantly under 1%, which makes the whole compatibility argument pointless.
I've been in the IT industry for 30 years, and neither me no anybody I know ever tried to upgrade the CPU. You buy MB + CPU together, don't care about some special cases.
Most AMD users are poors ... they'll use a 5+ year old board held together with duct tape just so they have enough money for bus fare.In reality, the percentage of customers who upgrade the CPU on an older motherboard is significantly under 1%, which makes the whole compatibility argument pointless.
I've been in the IT industry for 30 years, and neither me no anybody I know ever tried to upgrade the CPU. You buy MB + CPU together, don't care about some special cases.
Most AMD users are poors ... they'll use a 5+ year old board held together with duct tape just so they have enough money for bus fare.
Hardware Unboxed asked viewers and numbers were considerably higher for AM4 upgraders.
Looking at e.g. Minfactory CPU vs Mainboard sales numbers is another indicator.
I post a lot of gaming builds on another site and I can usually spot the AMD owners just by their avatar. If they have one of those creepy anime avatars of some young girl the chances that they want an AMD build with a white case and a crap load of RGB is 90% or better if I had to guess.Not just poor, they're dirt cheap-ists. Always have been, always will be.
What should I buy, an Intel Cpu + Mobo and an rtx 3060 tiMost AMD users are poors ... they'll use a 5+ year old board held together with duct tape just so they have enough money for bus fare.
Most AMD users don't have the budget for a new board, cpu and gpu.What should I buy, an Intel Cpu + Mobo and an rtx 3060 ti
OR just an AMD cpu and a RTX 3080?
Tough choice. It took me 5 seconds to decide.