Then you could go ahead and test the same areas as DF in Crysis 3 and KCD.
Personally I've tested ashes which supposedly scales well with Ryzen and I cal tell you that a 3900x is nowhere near my 10900k. I almost hit 80 fps in the ingame bench with 24/7 OC settings.
And their MB is also a terrible platform for Ryzen, DF does not care or try with Ryzen. They are not even aware or care that the MB they have is terrible. You should not be pairing an 3900x with that, what if they tested all their Intel 10th gen CPUs with an asrock z490 budget MB that Steve tested recently, the one that has shocking VRMs? That would be fair in my mind.
It might or might not be as bad as the MSI X570 Gaming they are using now, or it might be worse ,but that would be the same lousy unenthusiastic attempt they give Ryzen.
I think DF is incredibly biased and/or incompetent all round. They give Intel the best with MB platforms and tweaking/overclocking as well. They do nothing for Ryzen, bad platform and no tweaking nothing. You tell me who is dishonest/incompetent.biased?
All their Ryzen 3000 content is stock. Nothing has been tweaked timings wise and they have never even attempted to max out the infinity fabric either at 3800mhz/3733. They haven't ever tweaked Ryzen 3rd gen RAM performance period. But they overclocked Intels 10th gen (and all Intel CPUs) as a standard.
They do both for Intel, nothing for Ryzen. DF is only Intel, everything about their benchmarks/Ryzen setup/no Ryzen tweaking vs optimal conditions and overclocking for Intel CPUs vs stock Ryzen says exactly that. They have never even done a side piece for testing 3rd gen max IF clock or tweaked timings. But they routinely compare overclocked Intel CPU vs unoptimized Ryzen CPUs. If on Intel owner can OC and tweak their CPU, why not Ryzen owners get the same optimization treatment and benchmarks?
They care so little, they use a well known inferior MB, they don't care period. It shows they do no Ryzen research/testing, but they always do for Intel. DF is the worst, period. Even if the MB is 100% perfect and gives no issues whatsoever, it still says otherwise with their biased treatment of Ryzen vs Intel. They should have done research and bought an decent MB for Ryzen (only fair) to put my mind and others at rest. And they should be optimizing their Ryzen 3000 test bench as well (only fair) because they do for Intel constantly.
And let me put this way so that even you could understand, why don't you hound DF to give Ryzen a fair shot, why don't you give them hell to get them to do for Ryzen what they do for Intel? I know why, because that won't support your bias. Every publication is lying because DF treats Ryzen poorly and kisses Intel butt. You can go back to DF and suck their toes if you like, but while you are doing that ask them to give Ryzen the same treatment they give Intel. I think that is only fair, don't you?
Until that happens, it is DFs burden to explain why they don't optimize Ryzen 3000 in any tests whatsoever and also to explain why they are using an inferior platform for Ryzen. Why does Intel get the full AAA treatment but not Ryzen at their place of business? Their treatment and attitude is most clear, and you are blinded by fanboisim to even consider they are at fault in any way.