captaincranky
Posts: 19,684 +8,825
Are those British justices always going to wear those silly wigs? IMHO, they run around dressed like Napoleon in drag.
Are those British justices always going to wear those silly wigs? IMHO, they run around dressed like Napoleon in drag.
"I'm telling", really Davis?Do you mean to suggest there is something wrong with drag?
I'm reporting you.
Because it is impossible to tell whether an online threat will lead to a physical threat, an online threat is a form of terrorism because of this inability to tell whether the threat will lead to an actual physical attack. The individuals who are threatened will quite likely live in fear, and this fear will not be "shaken off" and "gotten over."
Well, as long as Bob's house is still insured, and a firm appointment is made as to the time of the fire.....(you make the call)So because you feel like it's "playful" it should be allowed... done here.Just to contrast...
50 years ago in a face-to-face confrontation...
Bob: I'm going to burn your ****ing house down!
Steve: That's fine. I've been meaning to buy a new boat always, and the insurance money sure wouldn't hurt. What time are you stopping by?
Today, on Twitter...
Bob: I'm going to burn your ****ing house down!
Steve, after temporarily moving into a hotel for his family's protection: I've alerted the police and reported you to Twitter.
So because you feel like it's "playful" it should be allowed... done here.
Couldn't people simply not join Twitter or Facebook, and go get themselves threatened in real life?
The same thing can happen with online bullying. A concentrated effort to destroy someone's life via threats, bullying, and online harassment can be very effective. In some cases it's even led to suicide, and it's very hard to prosecute the offenders because 'being a jerk' isn't against the law.
The world isn't some fairy tale with a happy ending where everyone is a winner and no one gets hurt.
We allow WAY to many weak, lazy and soft people to live/get away with things.
This may sound harsh but those people deserved to die IMO.
Todays youth grow up with a very sugercoated/protected outlook. They are safeguarded from reality and its causing massive damage to society. Life is a nasty process as this world is mean, treacherous and unforgiving.
Instead of trying to hide/protect them we need to prepare them for reality. Children need to learn at a young age to stick up for themselves, by themselves, its one of the most important/ critical life lessons.
Bullying is a 100% natural process that takes place and WILL TAKE PLACE in EVERY generation. Its a 100% natural process of living beings to separate the bold and strong from the weak and fragile. It's been around since the beginning of time and will be around long after were gone.
Call it youthfill postioning, postering, bullying, whatever. It's as natural as taking a sh!t.
Of all the "bullying" cases I hear about, I would say about 5-10% (or less) of them are real cases.
Not if the person threatening you online lives down the block.There is a monumental gap between having your personal space violated and being psychologically undermined on the Internet. ?
that's not an issue, that's how laws are written. Libel and slander are examples of illegal free speech because someone reacts adversely to them. Adverse reaction leads to laws all the time.The issue here is that the law criminalizes free speech because another party responds adversely to it. ?
No it's not. 'Drink bleach and die' (one of their favs) is not subjective.First of all, it is subjective in nature
Ok I'll put is as simple as I can.
My point is, you don't have to incur in threats to be able to express yourself without feeling like your "freedom of speech" has been impaired.
I can perfectly (I repeat) tell you how dumb is the idea to defend someone over the internet threatening another person without saying I'll kill you if you don't back me up. I'm speaking freely without incurring in threats.
Being sarcastic and jerk-ish is something you will see everywhere, which doesn't make it alright either but again, doesn't incur in threatening another person.
No it's not. 'Drink bleach and die' (one of their favs) is not subjective.
TL;DR
If you would be so kind as to read what they mean by SERIOUS cases to be reviewed AND refered by a magistrate to the crown court instead of sticking with the topic of the news you might actually have a point though.