Ok, so I admit I had to look that up.all contained in a Kakistocracy
It's crystal clear.Ok, so I admit I had to look that up.
But anyway, at its core, the judge ruled against Mush because:
"McCormick said, the June vote was flawed because the board presented “materially misleading” information to shareholders in the proxy statement urging them to ratify Mr. Musk’s pay package again.
Among the “many ways in which the proxy statement mangles the truth,” she wrote, was the assurance that a new vote would change the outcome of the case”.
I'm not sure how it could be any more clear.