The judge is clearly a complete *****, and it sounds like he's trying to make the trial easier on the murderer.
True, law enforcement should have been there. Still that doesn‘t make it a good idea for an inexperienced kid to cross state lines and play lawman. It obviously did not do him well.Either he shouldn't be there OR there are law enforcers there, enforcing the law.
It's a direct causation. You see it everywhere in this planet. Absent of law/authority, everyone end up kill every other ones.
Police is product of civililzation. Everywhere. Not only in "raycist american". But of course, most americans only know that the world ends on their west and east coast. So...
Like the lie that Kyle was defending himself... That's gotta hurt.The only thing “logarithmic” in this case is the amount BS fed to the public by the fake/woke media.
If you look at the situation and the judge history at all you should all know that regardless of the tech idiocy in display here (as in, with or without) the kid's walking out free.
The kid is innocent end of case. And the Prosecutor is a complete joke LOL. Feel like I am watching a soap opera just by the type of questions he is asking. I love how media is trying to make it a race and bias thing.
As I see it, I think you, and @Uncle Al, have hit the nail firmly on the head. Gun advocates in the US seem to think that the US constitution gives them the right to own and possess guns freely without any restrictions. I'm not a lawyer, much less a Constitutional lawyer, but I think any reasonable reading of the US constitution, given when it was written, would have to conclude that the only reason that any kind of "gun rights" was included in the constitution was because it was intended, in the absence of something like the US Military (Army, Navy, etc.) as a defense for the United States against attempts to take over the US.
And he was not legally deputized to enforce the law. As I see it, he is/was a product of a society that essentially mandates that people do something selfless to prove their worth to society. Unfortunately, I think his choice in this matter was far from wise.
Rittenhouse admitted he was not legally allowed to own the gun, and without his possession of the gun, I bet he would not have been emboldened to be there at all, and the killings HE committed would not have happened.
Again, I am not a lawyer, however, I think this judge just made a grave mistake by accepting the argument by the defense that the AI/pinch-imaging algorithms manipulate the image by adding/removing things that are not there, forcing the prosecution to prove that is not the case, and giving no time for the prosecution to prepare an argument in their favor. If Rittenhouse is found innocent, the prosecution will have an ideal opportunity for appeal because of this issue alone. As those who investigate specious claims in other fields know, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The judge simply took the opinion of the defense as proof of what they claimed without any actual evidence of the AI/Algorithms showing things not there in any case whatsoever.
Assuming the algorithms are implemented correctly, they follow the same principles of similar image enhancement algorithms, and similar algorithms have been implemented based on sound and proven theory to not add things that are not there.
The whole case like with the Floyd police is politically motivated, he'll be lucky not to be found guilty of 1st, 2nd and 3rd degree all at the same time.
I guess everyone else lighting up the whole city on fire and committing crimes had a reason... And idk who folded cause the Defense is winning.He had no reason to be there.
He had no reason to be there and bring a gun.
He had no reason to be there and bring an illegal gun.
He had no reason to be there during a curfew and bring an illegal gun.
I don't think he should walk away from this without consequences.
However, even the worst people deserve some sort of legal defense, and it is pitiful that all those ghouls paying for his lawyers can not find someone whose ability to present a reasonable argument folds as soon as tech is involved.
I don't think that is an conclusion that can be drawn. Why the prosecutor questioned the way he did is only known to him. I think its unfortunate that most people see this as a political issue. As I see it, the question is that as a US Citizen, was Rittenhouse acting with in the laws of the land?
I don't know about everyone else. Not relevant to his case.I guess everyone else lighting up the whole city on fire and committing crimes had a reason... And idk who folded cause the Defense is winning.
"Had he gotten the gun from Kyle". How about if Kyle hadn't brought an assault rifle with him and paraded around in it like he was playing paintball? Then he likely wouldn't have had the balls to be anywhere near the people he didn't like and there would have been no assault rifle in the picture. I'm not condoning the protestors/rioters but it's up to law enforcement to enforce the law. From what I've seen of the trial I think he is guilty of the reckless endangerment charge almost just by virtue of being there with an assault rifle and then using it.As he should considering he shot these people in self-defense. As well, the judge does not decide whether Kyle is acquitted or not, the jury does. And if they’re paying any attention to the evidence he will rightfully be acquitted. You can’t bring a decedents criminal history into trial so Rosenbaum being a pedophile has nothing to do with the fact that Kyle should be acquitted but my personal feelings are he got better than he deserved. Rosenbaum should’ve been killed in a slow painful matter not the quick death that he got. I fully believe that had he gotten that gun from Kyle he would’ve turned it on the crowd, his history of mental health issues, suicide attempts, sexually assaulting multiple children, beating multiple women, his erratic behavior that night… Kyle is a hero who saved countless lives that night and those of you saying he’s a murderer are the only ones politicizing this case.
I love the fact that you believe the nazis and the right have any common ground when the nazis and even the KKK have more in common with the far left, in fact the left were the people who basically invented the KKK and funded them, the right was created to fight against the left and the KKK and slavery, its the left always trying to destroy America and the core values it was created on....like all men be created equal and free.good.. that would work for me. you take a firearm that's only purpose is to kill people into a conflict zone under false pretenses "not expecting trouble", pee your little boy panties when real people chase you and panic and shoot them you should get all three and a office space sentence.
this poor kid was brain washed by brodozer luvin' deep-right nazis .. but he is still responsible. In reality him getting mansuaghter-2 is a gamble based on the judges biased far right agenda. But at least this kid will self cancel himself after therapy fails and guilt eats him alive.
I don't get it, CSI Miami always had crisp and clear images that they could zoom in on them 1000%. I don't see why pinching and zooming in would matter.
CSI Miami would always catch a killer's reflection in a TV screen that's 20ft away and the killer's blurry face appears to be the size of a thumbnail image.....super zoom in and BAM! Crystal, clear, picture perfect image of the killer. Case closed.
![]()
![]()
![]()
The constitution does. Its the amendments afterward that have stripped us of our right to do so.As I see it, I think you, and @Uncle Al, have hit the nail firmly on the head. Gun advocates in the US seem to think that the US constitution gives them the right to own and possess guns freely without any restrictions
If you believe the Bible any at all. Then you will know who has the final say in that. And it is not any of us. This same arrogance is also shown at every funeral. We will paint a pretty picture and say they have gone to a better place. When in reality, we don't have a clue. But that doesn't stop us from lying.Lol hes going to hell anyway for killing people
Either he shouldn't be there OR there are law enforcers there, enforcing the law.
It's a direct causation. You see it everywhere in this planet. Absent of law/authority, everyone end up kill every other ones.
Police is product of civililzation. Everywhere. Not only in "raycist american". But of course, most americans only know that the world ends on their west and east coast. So...
There's frame interpolation. There's pixel interpolation. This is the latter. The defense is correct.
Ok. So, if you were a prosecutor, you would do what.. let the double homicides slide until property damage cases were sorted out?The kid shouldn't have been there, But neither should have the rioters, who were also from out-of-state. This is a Blackjack push. Now, moving forward. Sequence of events. Who attacked who first? There lies the solution to this case. If Kyle is charged for being there, then so should any other rioter. This is a case bracketed in politics. The prosecutor is an ardent Democrat, ran for office as a Democrat, and has yet to prosecute rioters for the destruction of property as a Democrat. This from a political side that yaps about the law and their 'Democracy". Yep. A Democracy like North Korea.
What are 'death jabs'?The jurors have been targeted and efforts are made to intimidate, bully them into a decision the Radical Left wants. So who's tampering with this trial? Like it or not, the U.S. is in the middle of the second Civil War. It's mostly propaganda at this point, yet with very real flashpoints. It's also occurring in various countries. Frogs wising up to the slow boil being perpetuated by the global elites working together in all countries for their revolution. COVID-19 and the death jabs are very much part of the plan.
Yes! Finally some sense. Agreed, and nothing demonstrates this more clearly than the depraved sleazefest that Trump's Republican Party has become.If conspiracies aren't real, then why do we have laws against them? The Cold War didn't end. It morphed. Russia was attacked in 1917 by the British communists. You say that it's still authoritarian. Well, because it always has been. They went from the Tsar into the socialist revolution. They're use to it. Russia was an easy target. Socialism, communism, are BUZZWORDS by the globalist, financial elites. It has only the appearance of egalitarianism, social justice, peace, and tranquility. But then the iron grips sets in and another Stalin is born. You will never be free as long there's a consolidation of power. Getting caught up in the isms is only going to blind you to the reality that they're are all just tools to lure you into slavery. Anything can be corrupted.
Oh. Bless their minority hearts. I guess the good part of them being so meek and resigned to their fate is that there's hardly ever any trouble with them.And making it into a system most certainly would bring it into being. For the love of money (power, control, blood, etc) is (are) the root(s) of all evil. Not the objects, as the Fake Left likes to say to thwart responsibilities, but the actions. Critical Race Theory is just a strategy to force whites to kneel, since the Left has already accomplished this in minorities.
.. Come again?Yes, the Ku Klux Klan is running the country. The Democrats and RINO Republicans.
True. Listen to most Republican members of Congress, or the soulless voices of conservative media, and it's getting hard to shake the feeling that we're living Invasion of the Body Snatchers.Nothing ever happens without infiltration and disguise, a Fifth Column.