Leaked internal meetings reveal Zuckerberg will fight if lawmakers try to break up Facebook

Cal Jeffrey

Posts: 4,172   +1,421
Staff member
A hot potato: According to recordings of internal meetings within Facebook, The Zuck is prepared to "go to the mat" if Elizabeth Warren becomes president and tries to break up the company. The senator slashed back with her own harsh words calling out the company for its past misdeeds.

The Verge published leaked recordings of two Q&A meetings held last July by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. In the audio, the social media magnate remained calm and casual as he answered questions from employees, even joking at times. He clearly did not realize he was being recorded as his candor revealed.

He criticized Democratic presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren on her threats to break up Facebook and other Big Tech companies if elected to the nation's highest office.

"You have someone like Elizabeth Warren, who thinks that the right answer is to break up the companies," the Facebook boss told those gathered. "If she gets elected President, then I would bet that we will have a legal challenge, and I would bet that we will win the legal challenge."

Zuckerberg added that he does not want to fight the US government, but he will because he sees a breakup as an "existential threat."

"Does that suck for us? Yeah," he said regarding the potential of a legal war. "I mean, I don't want to have a major lawsuit against our own government, but look, at the end of the day, if someone's going to try to threaten something that existential, you go to the mat, and you fight."

Senator Warren, who is not known to mince words, was quick with a response via Twitter when the audio was released. She lambasted the CEO dredging up past issues that are still a thorn in Facebook's side.

"What would really "suck" is if we don't fix a corrupt system that lets giant companies like Facebook engage in illegal anticompetitive practices, stomp on consumer privacy rights, and repeatedly fumble their responsibility to protect our democracy," the lawmaker tweeted.

The CEO believes that breaking up Big Tech companies is not the solution, but had little else to offer other than the status quo.

"It's just that breaking up these companies, whether it's Facebook or Google or Amazon, is not actually going to solve the issues," Zuckerberg explained in one of the recordings. "And, you know, it doesn't make election interference less likely. It makes it more likely because now the companies can't coordinate and work together."

The recordings totaled over two hours and were not only about politics and the breakup of the company.

Zuckerberg explained why he chose not to appear before some foreign government inquiries, saying that "it just [didn't] really make sense." He also claimed the allegations of poor working conditions of Facebook contract workers were "a little overdramatic."

Those interested in reading the entire transcript can check out The Verge's write-up. It also has some choice snippets of the actual recordings in another article.

image credit: Frederic Legrand - COMEO via Shutterstock

Permalink to story.

 
Warren is now just following Trump's style by using Twitter................................
Not that I care for Facebook, but can the government even legally force a company like Facebook to break up?
 
Warren is now just following Trump's style by using Twitter................................
Not that I care for Facebook, but can the government even legally force a company like Facebook to break up?
Probably the only way it can do that is to prove Facebook is both a monopoly and necessary to daily life, which it simply is not. When AT&T was broken up it was unquestionably a monopoly and consumers were paying too much for phone service. What we got in exchange wasn't all that much better but at least it created opportunity for competition. As long as Twitter or any other legitimate alternative to FB exists Warren really has no case, and besides, this crusade is pure politics and everyone knows it. Her answer to the Facebook "problem" would be to declare it a utility and put the government in control.
 
Warren is now just following Trump's style by using Twitter................................
Not that I care for Facebook, but can the government even legally force a company like Facebook to break up?

Of course they can. Under the laws, when a company has and takes advantage of having unfair advantages and limit or stop their competition from being able to compete in the market place they can be held accountable. In the case of Facebook, despite their frequent apologies, they continue to allow criminal activity. Regardless of their excuses, they are responsible and can be held legally liable for every action. There are even provisions within the law that allow for the government to seize them, but that is a bit more complicated. It surrounds the threatened seizure of all merchant marine vessels and aircraft during WW2 and while that was a long time ago, the allowance is still very much alive today.

Frankly, she would be in a better position if they simply rewrote the laws on penalties for these transgressions from a straight fine based system to one in which the fines were a percentage of the offenders gross profits. Start hitting facebook for 50, 60, 75 percentage of their annual gross profit and facebook will quickly fall in line, or cease to exist and be broken up through chapter 11 bankruptcy.
 
Of course they can. Under the laws, when a company has and takes advantage of having unfair advantages and limit or stop their competition from being able to compete in the market place they can be held accountable. In the case of Facebook, despite their frequent apologies, they continue to allow criminal activity. Regardless of their excuses, they are responsible and can be held legally liable for every action. There are even provisions within the law that allow for the government to seize them, but that is a bit more complicated. It surrounds the threatened seizure of all merchant marine vessels and aircraft during WW2 and while that was a long time ago, the allowance is still very much alive today.

Frankly, she would be in a better position if they simply rewrote the laws on penalties for these transgressions from a straight fine based system to one in which the fines were a percentage of the offenders gross profits. Start hitting facebook for 50, 60, 75 percentage of their annual gross profit and facebook will quickly fall in line, or cease to exist and be broken up through chapter 11 bankruptcy.

Probably the only way it can do that is to prove Facebook is both a monopoly and necessary to daily life, which it simply is not. When AT&T was broken up it was unquestionably a monopoly and consumers were paying too much for phone service. What we got in exchange wasn't all that much better but at least it created opportunity for competition. As long as Twitter or any other legitimate alternative to FB exists Warren really has no case, and besides, this crusade is pure politics and everyone knows it. Her answer to the Facebook "problem" would be to declare it a utility and put the government in control.

Cool got it, thanks for a quick lesson on it
 
Warren is now just following Trump's style by using Twitter................................
Not that I care for Facebook, but can the government even legally force a company like Facebook to break up?
Probably the only way it can do that is to prove Facebook is both a monopoly and necessary to daily life, which it simply is not.

More and more employers are looking at their potential employees facebook page. It was even mentioned that if they don't find one they're likely to pass up on that person.
 
Warren is now just following Trump's style by using Twitter................................
Not that I care for Facebook, but can the government even legally force a company like Facebook to break up?

Nope. You don't "need" Fakebook, instagram, twitter & the like. But, considering how some people have their lives revolve around knowing what the celebs are doing, posting 3,593 photos daily of them with their lips pouting all the time, maybe the case can be made THEY need it. What they really need, is a psych evaluation ;)
 
Back