LG to show off the world's first 21:9 curved IPS monitor at next month's IFA trade show

Shawn Knight

Posts: 12,999   +130
Staff member
IFA 2014 is fast approaching and in addition to the debut of the Galaxy Note 4, we can now expect to see the world's first 21:9 curved IPS monitor courtesy of LG.

[newwindow="https://www.techspot.com/news/57771-lg-to-show-off-the-worlds-first-219-curved-ips-monitor-at-next-months-ifa-trade-show.html"]Read more[/newwindow]
 

Route44

Posts: 12,015   +82
Wow. After seeing a curved UHD Samsung LED TV at my local hh gregg I have to say that the curved screens really do make a viewing difference for the better -- a lot better.
 

VitalyT

Posts: 5,417   +4,899
In other words, they are going to take their currently sold LG 34UM95, stretch it from 34" to 37" and then bend it? I don't think it is such a good idea. Everybody who bought it says the current size and resolution are already perfect (which is the same 3,440 x 1,440), which means for one thing, they are reducing the DPI by making the same screen wider. But that existing screen is already the perfect 21:9. I think all they can do is break it. Plus there is nothing exciting in seeing a bigger screen with still the same resolution. We'll see...
 

captaincranky

Posts: 16,430   +5,214
Wow. After seeing a curved UHD Samsung LED TV at my local hh gregg I have to say that the curved screens really do make a viewing difference for the better -- a lot better.

Really? With the screen divided into 3 parts by bezels. That's "better"?
 

Route44

Posts: 12,015   +82
I was referring to the UD screens I saw that were one piece. If they can do that with monitors it will be very nice indeed.
 

captaincranky

Posts: 16,430   +5,214
I was referring to the UD screens I saw that were one piece. If they can do that with monitors it will be very nice indeed.
The picture attendant to the article shows split bezels, thus 3 separate screens. Agreed, it would likely be better as a one piece curved. Isn't that what Imax is all about?

I expect the picture could be an artist's rendering, or whatever. But, it needs to reach consumers as a single piece screen
 

cliffordcooley

Posts: 12,661   +6,033
21:9?
Why don't they reduce it to 7:3?

Really? With the screen divided into 3 parts by bezels. That's "better"?
The image above is 3 x 21:9 monitors not 1 single 21:9 monitor. I don't know why you think the bezel would be an issue, unless using multiple monitors.

Edit: you ninja'd me before I posted. :)
 

captaincranky

Posts: 16,430   +5,214
21:9?
Why don't they reduce it to 7:3?
I guess for the same reason they never reduced "16:10" to "8:5". With the denominator being the height, it makes for an easy comparison of relative height. (maybe).

Possibile reason two! If they called it what it is, "2.35 to 1:00", they might have to pay royalties to "CinemaScope".

Now, look at the picture in the article. That looks like 3/ 16:10's pushed together. Each one of those panels is certainly NOT 21:9!

At least not in that rendering.

Here's 21:9 LG
A2RY_130373618464231126KqP9BfRFa3.jpg
It doesn't even remotely look like the aspect ratios in the panels shown.
 
Last edited:
G

Guest

Now all we need is for AMD/Nvidia to get their act together and release something affordable to drive those pixel.