Man who lost Bitcoin wallet password while high recovers $400,000 using Claude AI after 11-year lockout

midian182

Posts: 11,722   +177
Staff member
WTF?! It's quite rare that we hear positive stories about AI, but at least one person is thankful for the proliferation of LLMs. A Bitcoin owner who forgot their wallet password 11 years ago just used Claude AI to access their cryptocurrency – all $400,000 worth.

An X user with the handle cprkrn writes that he was locked out of his wallet over 11 years ago because he got stoned, changed his password, and forgot it.

A few weeks ago, cprkrn found an old mnemonic that turned out to be for his previous password. Disheartened, he turned to AI for help, dumping his entire college computer into Claude.

Anthropic's AI discovered that an old wallet file from December 2019 was the missing piece. It reportedly contained the private keys needed to access the Blockchain.com wallet holding 5 BTC, bought back in 2015 when Bitcoin was around $250. Those coins had been sitting untouched since April of that year before finally being moved this week.

The user said he had been trying to brute-force his way back in using btcrecover, an open-source Bitcoin wallet recovery tool, and had tested an absurd number of combinations. Claude's own summary of the effort put the figure at 3.5 trillion password attempts, none of which were enough on their own.

The breakthrough came after the old mnemonic matched addresses linked to one particular wallet file. Claude then found an older backup and spotted a bug in the password configuration that meant the shared key and candidate passwords were not being combined properly. Once that was corrected, the wallet could be decrypted.

The ecstatic X post celebrating the recovery thanked Anthropic and CEO Dario Amodei, with cprkrn (maybe) joking that he would name his kid after the latter. Given that the alternative was leaving nearly $400,000 trapped forever because of a password created while high, the reaction seems understandable.

The story is one of those rare AI anecdotes that does not involve job losses, hallucinations, copyright lawsuits, or an agent deleting a production database. It is also a reminder that plenty of early Bitcoin fortunes remain out of reach because humans are very good at losing passwords, hard drives, and notebooks.

Five Bitcoin is a lot of money, but it pales in comparison to the 8,000 BTC, worth around $647 million, that James Howells famously lost when his hard drive was accidentally sent to a landfill filled with 1.4 million tons of waste. A court prevented him from searching the location last year, and he's still trying to buy the site.

Permalink to story:

 
It's quite rare that we hear positive stories about AI, but...
--
The story is one of those rare AI anecdotes that does not involve job losses, hallucinations, copyright lawsuits, or an agent deleting a production database.
The obvious purpose of this article is to spread negativity towards AI. This time, for a change, negativity is disguised as good news.
 
Another non-story in which the AI did something any human could have done, wouldn't have he been as stupid as the person using the AI
 
The obvious purpose of this article is to spread negativity towards AI. This time, for a change, negativity is disguised as good news.
It's actually the opposite of what Rob says that this is a rare AI anecdote 🤣 The vast majority of time, AI is beneficial to society. AI has helped me at work do things technically difficult and something I would've needed to rely on a contractor to do (which we never would've hired). And my sister who is the only person in her position at a small company is taking a leave of absence, but had set up Claude to regularly draft emails for action items she needs to take care of while she's gone (on her own, with no technical know-how). Whenever she can work, she just reviews the emails, adjusts language as needed, and hits send. The fact that he isn't aware that these kinds of anecdotes dominate AI usage means he has probably never used AI lol.

As I said before, TechSpot is ignoring almost all good news about AI:
I agree bad news is not biased news. But at TechSpot, almost all news I've read about AI has been bad news. The most recent example had an almost entirely fictional headline. It claimed that a data center used 29 million gallons of water without paying for it, except it was construction that used up the water lol.

TechSpot openly admits they will not use AI in their ethical statement. For some writers here, they are probably concerned AI will take away their job. As a result, this can develop into a conflict of interest for them to be reporting on AI, and that's how we see absurd statements like "The story is one of those rare AI anecdotes that does not involve job losses, hallucinations, copyright lawsuits, or an agent deleting a production database." The fact that this line got past editors reveals an even more serious concern about TechSpot reporting. Why is TechSpot even making a judgement here that AI is negative for society? This statement literally translates to "AI is almost always bad, and here are some reasons why." Yikes!
 
.. As a result, this can develop into a conflict of interest for them to be reporting on AI, and that's how we see absurd statements like "The story is one of those rare AI anecdotes that does not involve job losses, hallucinations, copyright lawsuits, or an agent deleting a production database." The fact that this line got past editors reveals an even more serious concern about TechSpot reporting. Why is TechSpot even making a judgement here that AI is negative for society? This statement literally translates to "AI is almost always bad, and here are some reasons why." Yikes!
Techspot is current attempting to register the domain AntiTechSpot, to reflect their current editorial direction.
 
Okay but if he can do this then anybody can do this, right? How could anybody possibly think their money is ever safe?
Well, how would they get your wallet to try and brute force it? This isn't an online account where such an attack would be blocked, it's a local hard drive holding the wallet.

Just like a physical safe. A locksmith can't lock pick it remotely.
 
Well, how would they get your wallet to try and brute force it? This isn't an online account where such an attack would be blocked, it's a local hard drive holding the wallet.

Just like a physical safe. A locksmith can't lock pick it remotely.

Thank You for explaining. I have no idea how bitcoin or any of the other crypto currencies work.
 
It's actually the opposite of what Rob says that this is a rare AI anecdote 🤣 The vast majority of time, AI is beneficial to society. AI has helped me at work do things technically difficult and something I would've needed to rely on a contractor to do (which we never would've hired). And my sister who is the only person in her position at a small company is taking a leave of absence, but had set up Claude to regularly draft emails for action items she needs to take care of while she's gone (on her own, with no technical know-how). Whenever she can work, she just reviews the emails, adjusts language as needed, and hits send. The fact that he isn't aware that these kinds of anecdotes dominate AI usage means he has probably never used AI lol.

As I said before, TechSpot is ignoring almost all good news about AI:


TechSpot openly admits they will not use AI in their ethical statement. For some writers here, they are probably concerned AI will take away their job. As a result, this can develop into a conflict of interest for them to be reporting on AI, and that's how we see absurd statements like "The story is one of those rare AI anecdotes that does not involve job losses, hallucinations, copyright lawsuits, or an agent deleting a production database." The fact that this line got past editors reveals an even more serious concern about TechSpot reporting. Why is TechSpot even making a judgement here that AI is negative for society? This statement literally translates to "AI is almost always bad, and here are some reasons why." Yikes!

Let's be honest here. It's not JUST TechSpot that might be reporting the negatives of having AI and Data Centers exploding across the world. We always have to look at both sides, the pros and the cons, and see the net result.
I read reports all the time that say A.I. is dumbing down society. I am guilty of using it myself, at the moment, because it does seem to be very good and intelligent at giving back quick concise answers that might take me a longer time to find. Whether that is good or bad, I don't have the data to say. Maybe, only time will tell?
 
Uhm if AI can be used to break a password that you forgot how is that any different than breaking a password that belongs to someone else?
 
The detail that breaks my brain is that he dumped his entire college computer into Claude and it just... worked. Not a specialized forensic tool, not a team of security researchers — a chatbot found a December 2019 wallet file and noticed a key combination bug that 3.5 trillion brute-force attempts couldn't compensate for. The boring explanation is probably that he just hadn't organized the files correctly for btcrecover to find the right backup, but still.
 
Every Bitcoin story eventually becomes either forgot password, lost hard drive, boating accident, or became millionaire by accident while high. This one somehow checked multiple boxes at once.
 
Honestly this is one of the best use cases for LLMs so far: pattern recognition across years of messy human digital chaos that nobody else has the patience to untangle...

Somewhere there’s a guy who sold 5 BTC for pizza in 2013 reading this story like a Vietnam flashback.
 
Claude did not actually figure out the password. Claude simply raised another possibility, that there might be a bug in the password key combination. Claude may have garnered that possibility from somebody else (a human) who was faced with the same problem and actually figured it out. So the credit should go to the human who figured it out.

It's like asking ten doctors for a diagnosis, and finally finding the one with the expertise to properly diagnose the issue.
 
Given the stories around absurdly high bills for running some AI jobs in the Cloud, I wonder how much it cost him for the Claude crunching?

Would be a laugh if it cost him more than the bitcoin recovered... 🤣
 
Back