Meta is bragging about how its AI keeps people on Instagram, while facing lawsuits over addiction

You mean the revelation that Facebook provides users with what they most want to see? Shocking, I agree.
It was way more than just that. Facebook was deliberately algorithmically fomenting domestic and international unrest. At the very least, individual employees should have been hit with accessory charges. Whether or not they would have been convicted is besides the point, as the arrest and court case would have become a permanent scar on their identities, thus disincentivizing others. Instead, absolutely nothing happened.
 
It was way more than just that. Facebook was deliberately algorithmically fomenting domestic and international unrest.
Utter nonsense. Facebook was linking people with the content they wished to see. This was all user-created posts -- and unless the posts themselves were illegal, Facebook has no business trying to moderate them. Censorship is a hallmark of the fascist Left, but in free societies, we tend to look with disfavor on that.

At the very least, individual employees should have been hit with accessory charges. Whether or not they would have been convicted is besides the point, as the arrest and court case would have become a permanent scar on their identities
You're literally admitting you favor lawfare to ruin individuals lives, in order to further your political goals.
 
You're literally admitting you favor lawfare to ruin individuals lives, in order to further your political goals.
That's been a publicly, well-known goal of federal prosecution since day 1. Catch up.

I think we live in different realities my dude. Peace be with you.
 
That's been a publicly, well-known goal of federal prosecution since day 1. Catch up.

I think we live in different realities my dude. Peace be with you.
Most folks have blocked and moved on. You are never going to have a real conversation with them. They live in a different world.

The guy argues that nazis were leftists ffs. Just block and move on. Literally will make things up to make them sound like they won an argument.

You know that saying about arguing with "insert", is like arguing with a pigeon, it will knock over the pieces, mess up the board, **** all over the place and act like it won
 
Most folks have blocked and moved on. You are never going to have a real conversation with them. They live in a different world.

The guy argues that nazis were leftists ffs. Just block and move on. Literally will make things up to make them sound like they won an argument.

You know that saying about arguing with "insert", is like arguing with a pigeon, it will knock over the pieces, mess up the board, **** all over the place and act like it won
Yep. I put him on ignore after the previous reply. Thanks for confirming.
 
The guy argues that nazis were leftists ffs
You can't change documented history by denying it. Germany's National Socialists began as a far Left labor party, and promoted, espoused, and implemented Leftist ideology and programs. It wasn't until their atrocities were revealed that liberals began revising history to call them "right wing", despite their sharing literally nothing in common with conservative ideology.

Most have blocked him and moved on
Why not try the Biden Admin's strategy, and attempt to pass a law banning social media posts that disagree with Leftist views? If that fails, you can always try the Antifa method of sending a masked gang of hoodlums to my home, to threaten and assault me and my family members.
 
Last edited:
The lawsuit is absurd. If you make a product people like to use, they'll use it. Half of Europe is addicted to watching soccer/football, and FIFA does everything possible to ensure its fans watch ever more avidly, and we all know people who can't survive ten minutes a day without consuming the products of the pop music industry. Should we sue FIFA and the RIAA for promoting addictive behavior? How about those who run lingerie ads for promoting sexual addiction? Video-game studies for promoting that particularly heinous addiction?

Most people have a need for social contact, and social media fills that need. Should Meta attempt to design a product no one wants to use?
You have broken the uncommon sense barrier that hides common sense.
For every child that has been harmed through predators using facebook, there should be more concern and public scrutiny. Most people have no idea how many predators seek victims through these platforms.
Images and videos of children being abused(in every manner) are posted on facebook regularly. The algorythm directs the users that seek that content, to that content. Facebook, will post a warning of what will be displayed.
And...
And then gives two choices;
"get help" which means facebook support. or
"View content anyway"

The families of victims have brought this information out for scrutiny and your corrupt gov't had a session which exposed the entire situation. And Questioned Mark Zuckerberg in that session...
Nothing happened! The content is still searchable...
Victims families have been unable to remove content of their own family members being abused.
Why does ANYONE continue to use facebook or any platform that allows this to continue? The gov't should not step in against the platform with new laws when the law is ignored. Law enforcement should investigate, locate and prosecute every user that posts and searches that content.
every individual employed by a platform in the structure that allows it and fails to report it must be charged. Each employee has a superior responsible for their employees all the way up to the top of the entire business and must be charged.
The public has continued to use a platform for self-interest fantasy dreaming of fame- or "just keeping in touch with family and friends" ...
Is it worth it? One child harmed, abused and/or life is ended renders the entire platform useless.
Can anyone here say that personally they need their facebook account more than one child needs to be safe and have a childhood without abuse, SA and even RTK(the worst possible experience anyone can suffer!)?
Please tell me why countless children, teens and adults suffering torture, abuse and death is acceptable in order for your facebook account that keeps you in touch with whoever...
Pick up the phone and call, go visit someone in person.
We don't need facebook!
We don't need corporate gov't to make new laws granting them authority to step in and participate in the abusive market they already own.
Where does all of the abusive content removed from the internet go? It is not destroyed- it isn't used as evidence- All of it is loaded into one database...
 
You can't change documented history by denying it. Germany's National Socialists began as a far Left labor party, and promoted, espoused, and implemented Leftist ideology and programs. It wasn't until their atrocities were revealed that liberals began revising history to call them "right wing", despite their sharing literally nothing in common with conservative ideology.

Why not try the Biden Admin's strategy, and attempt to pass a law banning social media posts that disagree with Leftist views? If that fails, you can always try the Antifa method of sending a masked gang of hoodlums to my home, to threaten and assault me and my family members.
you are a hammer today!
the weak nails are scared and block in fear. fear and weakness of people who block others and then post insults and bs that that they dont want to talk about-
I'm sure I am blocked just from the 12 or so comments I made. silence is the best response for those that don't value your words... but the insults and claims to be mentally superior continue.
men don't block and hide from someone that they insult and then gossip about it.
I bet if anyone does respond to me, they will point out that I abandoned capitalization and grammar- which is their limit for response. I hope I am wrong
to all you weak commenting blockers: can you speak to others without insults? can you work to make your mind as strong as your feelings about the information you discuss?
Not unless you can unblock, apologize for insulting opposing views.
Likely, my comment is only read by new users...
 
you are a hammer today!
the weak nails are scared and block in fear. fear and weakness of people who block others and then post insults and bs that that they dont want to talk about-
I'm sure I am blocked just from the 12 or so comments I made. silence is the best response for those that don't value your words... but the insults and claims to be mentally superior continue.
men don't block and hide from someone that they insult and then gossip about it.
I bet if anyone does respond to me, they will point out that I abandoned capitalization and grammar- which is their limit for response. I hope I am wrong
to all you weak commenting blockers: can you speak to others without insults? can you work to make your mind as strong as your feelings about the information you discuss?
Not unless you can unblock, apologize for insulting opposing views.
Likely, my comment is only read by new users...
I block folks who dont engage in good faith, insult, condescend and are here to argue, not discuss. Nobody is entitled to my time, if someone wants to post absolute hog wash, thats on them. I owe nobody anything. I am not here to be their whipping boy and attacked repeatedly. Blocking is absolutely necessary for toxic folks. Thank god its an option or many places would be unusable on the internet.

Its more of a statement on them. Being toxic AF does not entitle anyone to a response. Nothing to do with weakness and everything to do with self respect. Its my life, my time. All to often folks on the internet today feel entitled to label, insult, condescend anonymously. They feel owed a response, thats not how this works. I guarantee in person they don't act like that. The internet tough guy attitude is far to common and I have no desire to argue with someone's ego. I use facts and real life to frame my thoughts, not made up fantasies with the intent of always being "right".

I dont insult opposing views. I block those that do. See how that works? Where is my apology? I wont hold my breath. They are incapable. I discuss opposing views with folks every single day, its my hobby. Very few get blocked, but the ones that do, they have earned it. And I have no obligation to give them anything. They can sit there and talk about me until the cows come home. I dont care, they have no power over me and I owe them nothing.

As you said, silence is the best answer and thats what blocking does. It ignores the person. If folks want to be engaged, they should do so in good faith and be respectful. If not, well, life is too short to engage in toxicity with people whose only goal is to troll and insult. There is no reason to engage with such folks on the internet. If you want to bang your head against the wall repeatedly, feel free to do so but that one I will disagree with you on, respectfully. You see it as weakness. I see it as strength and self respect. Ignoring is often the only tool.

IF (and I mean IF) you want to go the patronizing route, I will happily block you and revel in the power I have over myself. That being said, I hope that we get to be good friends and discuss respectfully throughout the years we have left.

I would like to add that your post here is along the lines of "claims to be mentally superior" so you do have a bit of pot meet kettle going on there. Calling people weak, scared, demanding apologies for things you dont even know. I dunno man, might want to re-evaluate that one. Or are you incapable of making your mind as strong as your feelings? Can you disagree with someone without insults? If so, not a good start.
 
Last edited:
I block folks who dont engage in good faith, insult, condescend and are here to argue, not discuss. Nobody is entitled to my time, if someone wants to post absolute hog wash, thats on them. I owe nobody anything. I am not here to be their whipping boy and attacked repeatedly. Blocking is absolutely necessary for toxic folks. Thank god its an option or many places would be unusable on the internet.

Its more of a statement on them. Being toxic AF does not entitle anyone to a response. Nothing to do with weakness and everything to do with self respect. Its my life, my time. All to often folks on the internet today feel entitled to label, insult, condescend anonymously. They feel owed a response, thats not how this works. I guarantee in person they don't act like that. The internet tough guy attitude is far to common and I have no desire to argue with someone's ego. I use facts and real life to frame my thoughts, not made up fantasies with the intent of always being "right".

I dont insult opposing views. I block those that do. See how that works? Where is my apology? I wont hold my breath. They are incapable. I discuss opposing views with folks every single day, its my hobby. Very few get blocked, but the ones that do, they have earned it. And I have no obligation to give them anything. They can sit there and talk about me until the cows come home. I dont care, they have no power over me and I owe them nothing.

As you said, silence is the best answer and thats what blocking does. It ignores the person. If folks want to be engaged, they should do so in good faith and be respectful. If not, well, life is too short to engage in toxicity with people whose only goal is to troll and insult. There is no reason to engage with such folks on the internet. If you want to bang your head against the wall repeatedly, feel free to do so but that one I will disagree with you on, respectfully. You see it as weakness. I see it as strength and self respect. Ignoring is often the only tool.

IF (and I mean IF) you want to go the patronizing route, I will happily block you and revel in the power I have over myself. That being said, I hope that we get to be good friends and discuss respectfully throughout the years we have left.

I would like to add that your post here is along the lines of "claims to be mentally superior" so you do have a bit of pot meet kettle going on there. Calling people weak, scared, demanding apologies for things you dont even know. I dunno man, might want to re-evaluate that one. Or are you incapable of making your mind as strong as your feelings? Can you disagree with someone without insults? If so, not a good start.
First things first:
Thanks for this lesson- genuinely greatful. I read your statement section by section and then my statements... You are correct
I stated my opinion of what I was witnessing(at least I thought so).
I apologize- I was wrong and
should not have said anything.
One thing in your comment struck lightning:
" All to often folks on the internet today feel entitled to label, insult, condescend anonymously. They feel owed a response, thats not how this works. I guarantee in person they don't act like that."
So very true.
Keeping it short-
-I was wrong
-I apologize
-thank you
no excuses- except I was working hard labor in the forest which has been smoked out from nearby forest fires... itxs true but Nope not an excuse or a reason for my actions...
 
First things first:
Thanks for this lesson- genuinely greatful. I read your statement section by section and then my statements... You are correct
I stated my opinion of what I was witnessing(at least I thought so).
I apologize- I was wrong and
should not have said anything.
One thing in your comment struck lightning:
" All to often folks on the internet today feel entitled to label, insult, condescend anonymously. They feel owed a response, thats not how this works. I guarantee in person they don't act like that."
So very true.
Keeping it short-
-I was wrong
-I apologize
-thank you
no excuses- except I was working hard labor in the forest which has been smoked out from nearby forest fires... itxs true but Nope not an excuse or a reason for my actions...
All good man, I can certainly relate to the hard work. Thank you for being reasonable and respectful.

Also, it sounds like you are fighting fires.
Thank you for helping keep things safe and I pray for your safety. Fires are no joke. Ive been impacted by the smoke in my area but not any fires luckily. I am grateful for the brave and sefless folks who commit their lives to preventing and fighting them as it becomes more and more of an issue on this planet.

I am glad we were able to sort this out. Cheers to many more thoughtful and engaging conversations!
 
All good man, I can certainly relate to the hard work. Thank you for being reasonable and respectful.

Also, it sounds like you are fighting fires.
Thank you for helping keep things safe and I pray for your safety. Fires are no joke. Ive been impacted by the smoke in my area but not any fires luckily. I am grateful for the brave and sefless folks who commit their lives to preventing and fighting them as it becomes more and more of an issue on this planet.

I am glad we were able to sort this out. Cheers to many more thoughtful and engaging conversations!
Thank You!
had you not taken the time to tell me, I would have continued acting like an obnoxious ____ ! I also realized that some people troll as they get crushed in conversations by trolls...
I have served as a volunteer firefighter with the forest service, then I trained and joined the FEMA vulunteer urban search and rescue. But, the task force for my area was defunded when leadership was exposed for bypassing testing and training for their friends...
now I live in the forest and work here homesteading. I also work for many other property owners in my area.
Just being outside in the smoke(from fires over 50 miles away) was rough! I do alot of hard labor, breathing the smoke while working was bad! real bad!
We have had a couple fires close enough for evacuation...
thanks again for your kindness, my friend!
 
Back