Microsoft shares their hardware recommendations for gaming PCs at any budget

DragonSlayer101

Posts: 987   +14
Staff
In a nutshell: Hardware evolves every year, with new releases, naming changes, and endless benchmarks making it difficult for non-enthusiasts to figure out which CPUs and GPUs fit their needs and budget. Microsoft recently published a straightforward guide to help users choose the proper hardware.

Microsoft recently published a blog post on optimizing gaming rigs for better performance. It outlines recommended hardware configurations for smooth frame rates across all budgets and offers guidance on selecting keyboards, mice, and headsets for the best gameplay experience.

Microsoft's recommendations for key hardware components, such as the CPU, GPU, and RAM, largely align with the system requirements for most triple-A titles. It organizes the guidance around different budget tiers, helping gamers choose the proper setup, whether they are building entry-level, mid-range, or high-end rigs.

Entry-level gaming (1080p, Medium settings)

  • CPU: At least AMD Ryzen 5 5600 or Intel Core i5-12400
  • GPU: NVIDIA GTX 1660 Super or AMD Radeon RX 6600

Mid-range gaming (1440p, High settings)

  • CPU: 6-core or better. AMD Ryzen 5 7600 or Intel Core i5-13600K recommended.
  • GPU: NVIDIA RTX 3060 Ti / 4060 Ti or AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

High-end gaming (4K)

  • CPU: 8-core or better. AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D or Intel Core i7-13700K recommended
  • GPU: NVIDIA RTX 4080 or AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Microsoft notes that 16GB of system memory suffices for most games, though serious players may benefit from 32GB in demanding titles, especially when using heavy mods. The company also recommends a minimum 1TB SSD for gamers with large libraries. While SATA SSDs work, Microsoft prefers NVMe for its support of DirectStorage technology.

Microsoft reminded custom PC builders that their motherboard should not only support the chosen hardware but also provide enough expansion slots and connectivity for peripherals and networking. The company emphasized good cable management, which improves airflow, lowers temperatures, and extends component lifespan.

Microsoft's accessory recommendations advise selecting a monitor that matches the system's capabilities. A 144Hz display is sufficient for smooth gameplay in most titles, though higher-end monitors with 165Hz to 240Hz refresh rates may benefit competitive shooters and fast-action games.

For input, the recommendations confirm what most gamers already know: mechanical keyboards offer crisp, tactile feedback and faster actuation than membrane keys, improving control across genres. The company prefers mice with adjustable DPI to fine-tune cursor sensitivity, with higher DPI suited for quick camera movements and lower DPI for steadier aim in shooters.

Microsoft recommends surround sound headsets with large 40 – 50 mm drivers for immersive gameplay that provides the best audio experience. It also suggests a noise-canceling or directional microphone to ensure clear communication in multiplayer games.

Microsoft's ideas aren't revolutionary. They are pretty much common sense to avid gamers. However, they are a handy reference tool for those who struggle with finding the right combination for their needs.

Permalink to story:

 
Who wrote that crap?
6600 is two tiers above 1660Super, while 6700XT is tier below 4060Ti.
Any 8core CPU will do for 4K over 60Hz.
None of the setups here will utilize high refresh screens with assigned resolution (unless maybe You're playing Counter Strike).
Microsoft should concentrate on maximizing shareholders' value, not writing gaming tutorials.
 
No words of the type of ram.... but thats not necessary
Microsoft notes that 16GB of system memory suffices for most games, though serious players may benefit from 32GB in demanding titles, especially when using heavy mods. The company also recommends a minimum 1TB SSD for gamers with large libraries. While SATA SSDs work, Microsoft prefers NVMe for its support of DirectStorage technology.
 
3060Ti for 1440p?
Id like to hear Waltons take on that.
I mean its doable. My 4060 can play games at 1440p without issue. testing it at 4k on my TV it can do Halo Infinite at medium-high mix at 60 FPS minimum. A 3060ti is more powerful then this.

That being said the setups here are wild. We jump from a 6700xt to a 7900xtx, no mention of modern cards like the 9060xt or the 5000 series. Who at microsoft stepped out of cryostasis to turn his homework in?
 
... Microsoft should concentrate on maximizing shareholders' value

Noooo, maximizing on squeezing as much as they can out of users on the short term is what got us into this crap.

BTW, MS does not mention that if you do some mild office type of work, with a number of applications open and using Teams, you can forget about 16GB RAM.

To continue on this: given the RAM drought, laptop makers are talking about systems with 8GB again. Hope that's not soldered memory, or they are creating instantly obsolete systems.
 
3060Ti for 1440p?
Id like to hear Waltons take on that.

Tons of people does that still, and did for years. You know most PC gamers just don't put the preset to Ultra right? Games don't get better because they run on Ultra preset. Newer games look great even on Medium and the difference between even High and Ultra is mostly nothing. Nothing you will see when ACTUALLY PLAYING the game, even Medium looks great for the most part. Ultra preset often adds TONS of CRAP like DOF, Motion Blur and MORE FOG. I always use custom settings myself, max textures and viewing distance always. No blur and fog, thank you.

DLSS 4 also was a game changer for longevity, which AMD GPU users sadly did not get, due to FSR 4 only supporting RDNA 4.

FSR 3.1 and older is just crap in comparison. Worse than DLSS 2 from 6 years ago. DLSS 4 is the best upscaler today and with broad support in games. Pretty much all AAA games has DLSS support today. Another huge problem for FSR, lack of support.

While FSR 4 is good enough, tried it, the problem is lacking support and the fact that most AMD GPU users was left in the ditch with no support, including dGPUs, iGPUs and APUs, the latter could really benefit from good upscaling.

FSR Redstone might fix the support problem over time but won't change the fact that the only good FSR implementation won't work on RDNA 3 and older.

RDNA 1, 2 and 3 aged like milk really. VRAM was generally fine but GPU arch can't do RT or RT elements, which more and more games use (force), and have been using for years at this point. No good upscaling support to help either. Hardware support is missing.

If you think VRAM and raster perf is the only thing that matters in 2025, you have no clue really. This is not where the industry is heading.

Would I personally buy mid-end or the specs listed here, no, but most gamers are. So these specs looks just fine. I like my RTX 4090 for 1440p gaming, with a 9800X3D + 240 Hz and 500 Hz OLEDs. I prefer games running at several hundred fps with extremely high minimum lows and I don't really care if games run medium, high or ultra. Smoothness is what gives me insane immersion, not pure visuals. 200 fps minimum 1% lows with 400-500 fps avg on a 500 Hz OLED... Insanely smooth. 120+ Hz CRT level of smoothness really.

LCD is a smearing mess in comparison. Unless maybe BFI 240 fps/Hz or better but visuals look horrible regardless and typically you need a TN panel for decent motion clarity on LCD which obviously looks even worse than IPS/VA (these are slow tho)
 
Last edited:
RDNA 1, 2 and 3 aged like milk really. VRAM was generally fine but GPU arch can't do RT or RT elements, which more and more games use (force), and have been using for years at this point. No good upscaling support to help either. Hardware support is missing.
(these are slow tho)
I do not have any game using RT and only one with some light RT efects. So much about spreading RT over the world for long 6 years.
Even 5500XT (RDNA 1 card) has enough raw power to run games I have in 1080. So much about lack of upscaling.


... iGPUs and APUs could really benefit from good upscaling.
That was the idea behind upscaling.
Now it is used as crutches for high end GPU to achieve playable fps.

I like my RTX 4090 for 1440p gaming, with a 9800X3D + 240 Hz and 500 Hz OLEDs. I prefer games running at several hundred fps with extremely high minimum lows and I don't really care if games run medium, high or ultra. Smoothness is what gives me insane immersion, not pure visuals. 200 fps minimum 1% lows with 400-500 fps avg on a 500 Hz OLED... Insanely smooth.
Looks like you managed to get you ego enhancer.
Enjoy it while it lasts.
 
I do not have any game using RT and only one with some light RT efects. So much about spreading RT over the world for long 6 years.
Even 5500XT (RDNA 1 card) has enough raw power to run games I have in 1080. So much about lack of upscaling.



That was the idea behind upscaling.
Now it is used as crutches for high end GPU to achieve playable fps.


Looks like you managed to get you ego enhancer.
Enjoy it while it lasts.

Who cares what you have installed or not, I bet you play old games using old hardware, no-one cares. It is a fact that tons of new games has RT elements with no option to disable them. Has been true for years. Industry is moving away from baked lighting and RT is needed, software or hardware, don't really matter. Game developers can't wait to not waste hours upon hours on fake baked lighting. Most AMD GPUs buckle when RT elements are present. Only RDNA 4 does decent. This is the reason why mainly AMD GPU owners complain. Just like they complain about upscaling, because their GPUs can't do it properly.

I enjoy new hardware always. As I am not poor and have to settle. Nor do I have to complain daily about anything and everything like most of the people here.

Ego enhancer. Yeah, no. It is called being successful and able to buy new and shiny stuff. I make dime. I spend dime. I don't spend time crying on the internet like most you negative people. I don't understand you actually. Instead of whining, you could earn money, so you did not have to complain.

Negativity spiral. Try to get out.
 
Last edited:
It is a fact that tons of new games has RT elements with no option to disable them.
Not enough tons in genre I do like.

Ego enhancer. Yeah, no. It is called being successful and able to buy new and shiny stuff.
I eventually comes game I do like which will need RT capability, I can go to shop and buy new card capable to run it at 4k (if that kind of card exists).
Just do not need it. Yet.
 
Back