New FCC ruling sends mobile carriers a very real message about stopping robospam texts

Jimmy2x

Posts: 238   +29
Staff
In a nutshell: Earlier this week, the FCC released its first ruling to address robospam and unlawful text messaging practices. The new directive requires mobile providers to block potentially illegal messages from invalid, unallocated, unused, or blocked numbers. The ruling is designed to provide all mobile users with similar levels of protection, regardless of their chosen mobile provider.

The new rules, officially adopted on March 16th, provide explicit instructions for wireless carriers to protect consumers from fraudulent and illegal text messages. Messaging scams, also known as robotexting, have become a prevalent problem over the last several years. Unlike robocalls, robotexts can employ several strategies for exploiting unsuspecting users, from social engineering to fraudulent but authentic-looking links and information.

Sharp increases in reported cases and loss amounts prompted the FCC to take recent action on behalf of all mobile consumers. According to the Commission's statement, the number of roboscam complaints rose from 3,300 in 2015 to almost 19,000 in 2022. The accompanying report cites consumer losses due to fraudulent text messages totaling $231 million during the first three quarters of 2022. The staggering figure marks a more than 62% increase compared to 2020.

The new rules require mobile carriers to block messages suspected of fraudulent activity based on their origination point. The scope of the ruling applies to text messages originating from the North American Numbering Plan and numbers identified and included in a "reasonable" Do-Not-Originate (DNO) plan.

A DNO plan is submitted by providers and includes invalid, unallocated, unused numbers and any blocked numbers previously requested by its users. In addition to the blocking plans, carriers must have a specified point of contact for individuals to report erroneously blocked messages.

The scope of the new ruling applies to wireless networks that utilize the short message service (SMS) and multimedia messaging service (MMS) platforms. It does not cover over-the-top (OTT) messaging services that rely on existing internet services such as Facebook Messenger, WhatsApp, Telegram, etc.

Despite the new rules, mobile subscribers should not rely solely on their carrier's newfound responsibilities to stay protected. The announcement references previous FCC recommendations and guidance for mobile consumers looking to protect themselves from scam messages. It includes tips and advice on what types of activity to watch for, how users can protect themselves from scams, information on the FCC's current actions, and links to additional information on robotexts and other scams.

Based on the FCC's announcement and comments, the new robotext spam ruling is the first of what could result in several future actions aimed at further protecting mobile subscribers.

"The Commission will also take further public comment on text authentication measures and other proposals to continue to fight illegal scam robotexts," The FCC statement concluded.

Permalink to story.

 
I support that. I have had my cell number for many years.It probably leaked in breached databases, I receive calls, sometimes daily. And as of lately, they call using local WA numbers, f**s.
I almost never pick a phone when someone I don't recognize calls. But when I do there is second of silence and an automated voice message offering me garbage that I dont need.
Robocall tech became too simple with no serious punishment for such.
Make one nationwide database for everybody who dares to advert using a phone.
Make them pay tenths of thousands of dollars for a single call to a number not allowing such calls.
 
I support that. I have had my cell number for many years.It probably leaked in breached databases, I receive calls, sometimes daily. And as of lately, they call using local WA numbers, f**s.
I almost never pick a phone when someone I don't recognize calls. But when I do there is second of silence and an automated voice message offering me garbage that I dont need.
Robocall tech became too simple with no serious punishment for such.
Make one nationwide database for everybody who dares to advert using a phone.
Make them pay tenths of thousands of dollars for a single call to a number not allowing such calls.

I think the best spam calls I've received are the ones saying that I failed to show up to court in NY and if I don't pay money they're going to have the local police come to my door to arrest me. NY...hahaha! I've never been to NY. I haven't had one of those calls for a few years now.

I don't get many spam calls anymore, but I do see a shitton of spam texts every 2 years when the politicalbullshit starts up. Biden this.....Trump that.....local senators crap....it can be half a dozen or more a day for about a 2-3 month span. Then they stop, until the next set of elections comes up.
 
I wonder what's changed at the FCC; that they would begin taking action now?
They're tired of getting robo calls and texts and so are their employers(congress). Carriers have been saying it would be "too hard to block spam calls and texts" but just because it's hard doesn't mean it's impossible. Carriers would rather keep profit margins high than block robo calls because people who make robo calls are also their customers.
 
Number spoofing is one of the reasons I kept my number from another state, after moving. I can use Tasker to pickup/hangup on the entire state's area codes.
 
Huh. I thought that they always had these rules in place but no way to enforce them because of spoofers. Now I find out that this was legal? Oh jeez... get the boomers out of office. The tech-era can't be properly ruled by dinosaurs!
 
Huh. I thought that they always had these rules in place but no way to enforce them because of spoofers. Now I find out that this was legal? Oh jeez... get the boomers out of office. The tech-era can't be properly ruled by dinosaurs!
And put who in though? The same bunch that can't even write a smart thermostat app without a bunch of problems, and believes that 5-day work weeks and working Mondays is reason enough to need comforting from their life coach or emotional support piglet?
 
And put who in though? The same bunch that can't even write a smart thermostat app without a bunch of problems, and believes that 5-day work weeks and working Mondays is reason enough to need comforting from their life coach or emotional support piglet?
It seems that you've forgotten that Generation-X is actually a thing. What, did you think that I meant to skip X and jump directly to Y or Z?
 
Back