New study says the most popular Android apps leave millions open to data attacks

Justin Kahn

Posts: 752   +6

report android google play

A new study claims that a large portion of the most popular free apps on Google Play are highly vulnerable to malicious attacks. Security firm FireEye recently released a study suggesting that SSL vulnerabilities within these apps and the man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks they allow for "are wreaking havoc on data security" throughout the Android ecosystem.

After analyzing the 1000 most popular free apps available on Google Play, the firm found that as many as 73% of them were highly vulnerable to MITM attacks due to poor or faulty SSL management. In a random sampling of 10,00 free applications, FireEye's data says around 60% of them were vulnerable. "These popular apps allow an attacker to intercept data exchanged between the Android device and a remote server," the company said in a blog post.

The study covered three separate SSL errors including faulty trust managers, code that mishandles SSL errors when using Webkit and when apps don't verify the remote server hostname. Trust management issues were spotted in 73% of the top 1000 free apps and 40% of the 10,000 apps FireEye looked at. Webkit errors were also quite abundant at 77% of the top 1000 free apps and around 13% of the 10,000 chosen in the study. Host verification checks seemed to be much better across the board registering in the single digits.

report android google play

According to FireEye, the issues are effecting ad libraries and things of that nature as well:

"Applications may use third-party libraries to enable part of their functionality. When these libraries have baked-in vulnerabilities, they are particularly dangerous because they make all applications that use them, and frequently the devices that run them, vulnerable."

FireEye also points out that the two top advertising libraries they looked at, Flurry and Chartboost, both suffered from faulty trust management. While both of these networks have now been updated to correct the issue, the company suggests the massive number of third party apps connected to them that haven't updated yet, may still be open to attacks. Apps that in some way use Flurry's libraries, for example, "have been downloaded over 8.7 billion times," according to FireEye.

Reports suggest some of the major apps and ad networks like both of the aforementioned companies have started to introduce updates for these vulnerabilities. FireEye said it "notified the developers, who acknowledged the reported vulnerabilities and addressed them in subsequent versions of their applications." More a more technical breakdown of the company's findings head over to the official blog post.

Permalink to story.

 
What say you android fanbois? Are you going to attack Apple or defend this trash?
 
What say you android fanbois? Are you going to attack Apple or defend this trash?

Wow big talk there Mr "guest".
Maybe if you understood anything about people that prefer android you'd realize that we know that risk and reward go hand in hand.

Also: FireEye said it "notified the developers, who acknowledged the reported vulnerabilities and addressed them in subsequent versions of their applications."

Looks like the problem is being taken care of already and at the same time please point me to a credible post on any forum anywhere about an android user that got hit by any of these potential vulnerabilities.
 
It sounds like the in-app advertisements made these apps most vulnerable. I'm curious if the paid-for apps faired better off than their ad-sponsored free version. I tried to follow the URL but the site went down.
 
The preference for Android is born from the depths of irrationality.
 
What say you android fanbois? Are you going to attack Apple or defend this trash?
Proper Apple iSheep haven't got the brains to be neutral like us sensible Android and Windows users. :D


hint: "sheep" is synonymous to portray the meaning of "masses" ... the masses (to the tune of 89%) of the world use Android. You have to change up your wording. The new sheep are Android users.
 
The study doesn't tell us which of the most popular apps are vulnerable to attacks but I sure hope they've informed the devs responsible for the ones they've discovered. The only one I see in the above screenshot which I have is WhatsApp but seeing they're now owned by FB... I won't hold my breath.

hint: "sheep" is synonymous to portray the meaning of "masses" ... the masses (to the tune of 89%) of the world use Android. You have to change up your wording. The new sheep are Android users.
Did you notice the use of the word 'proper' in front of iSheep? I wasn't referring to the general Apple users. You get Apple users and you get iSheep... there's a subtle difference.
 
Did you notice the use of the word 'proper' in front of iSheep? I wasn't referring to the general Apple users. You get Apple users and you get iSheep... there's a subtle difference.
Maybe, but methinks not enough to matter.

hint: "sheep" is synonymous to portray the meaning of "masses" ... the masses (to the tune of 89%) of the world use Android. You have to change up your wording. The new sheep are Android users.
Baaaa.....baaaa.....give me my mobile phone or give me death......(I don't care what brand it is).

Sheep.jpg


Call me....!
 
They said it's true about email ssl and all of you who think your're safe with that on the pc. Don't know how that works. What if you just reassembled firefox (source there) using their certificate? Or just use the firefox certificate to decrypt other messages.
 
I'm neither, I am just waiting for a Linux powered phone :) free and open-source without groogle malware and spyware
 
Back