For the return of our monthly GPU pricing updates, we took a short break to review the newcomers and see where everything settled. We're in store for a bumper episode as there's much to discuss.
For the return of our monthly GPU pricing updates, we took a short break to review the newcomers and see where everything settled. We're in store for a bumper episode as there's much to discuss.
I only afraid this situation won't turn into buyers trouble. They have more than great sales in other fields. Moreover, they could turn that death of mass market or shrinkage down to few of enthusiasts in total abandon of DIY.No sale = lower prices. Good to see this after all this time. But still single digit discount.
Can you explain -- in detail -- the algorithm and calculations you used to arrive at this figure?Still ridiculously overpriced; top end shouldn't be more than $700 MSRP.
Any card with less than 12gb of ram is garbage
Still ridiculously overpriced; top end shouldn't be more than $700 MSRP.
Exactly! not enough discount imoNo sale = lower prices. Good to see this after all this time. But still single digit discount.
the common sense one; this nonsense went into full swint with nvidia 20 series to see how much they could rip off for marginal gains.Can you explain -- in detail -- the algorithm and calculations you used to arrive at this figure?
Common sense says if they're selling a product like hotcakes at current prices, why should they feel obligated to reduce them? And given NVidia's current margins on gaming GPUs, even if they reduced their profit margin to zero, a $700 card would only drop in price by about $80 or so. Or do you believe they should sell products at a loss, to demonstrate their loyalty to you, the gamer?the common sense one; this nonsense went into full swint with nvidia 20 series to see how much they could rip off for marginal gains.
Why would you pay that, when you can get a 4060 for $299?Everyone of them is still a total rip-off. Imagine paying $430US for the garbage class 4050 Ti.
Like Steve say " It depends"...Any card with less than 12gb of ram is garbage
Why would top end video cards be the same price they were back in the 1080ti days? $750 in 2017, the year the 1080ti launched, is around $950 today. Why would graphics cards defy inflation? Especially when people have shown they would pay 50-100% more for a GPU during the previous two crypto currency crisis's.Still ridiculously overpriced; top end shouldn't be more than $700 MSRP.
Cost per frame only matters when the minimum frame rate is acceptable.Like Steve say " It depends"...
on the price you pay
on the games and resolution
expectations
A 256 Bit 8GB card like 3060Ti, 3070 and 3070Ti for a good price still beat the curent gen at performance per dolar.
![]()
![]()
I got an 3070 one year ago for $300, the single player games I play all are over 60fps at 1440p.Cost per frame only matters when the minimum frame rate is acceptable.
I paid CAD750 (around $575 back then) for a 1080 card at the end of 2017. The Ti version was around 200 more. The cheapest 4080 card I can find around nowadays is CAD1420. That is 189.33% more. If that’s not greed, I don’t know what greed is.Common sense says if they're selling a product like hotcakes at current prices, why should they feel obligated to reduce them? And given NVidia's current margins on gaming GPUs, even if they reduced their profit margin to zero, a $700 card would only drop in price by about $80 or so. Or do you believe they should sell products at a loss, to demonstrate their loyalty to you, the gamer?
You don't know what greed is. The 1080 has 7 billion transistors. The 4080 has 46 billion. In constant 2017 dollars per transistor, the 1080 costs 380% **more** than the 4080. My home -- which certainly doesn't have 7 times as many rooms as it did in 2017, has risen in price about 220% over the same period.I paid CAD750 (around $575 back then) for a 1080 card at the end of 2017. The Ti version was around 200 more. The cheapest 4080 card I can find around nowadays is CAD1420. That is 189.33% more. If that’s not greed, I don’t know what greed is.
If your process argument is to be believed please clarify why it doesn’t work for say Zen1 vs Zen4 CPUs.You don't know what greed is. The 1080 has 7 billion transistors. The 4080 has 46 billion. In constant 2017 dollars per transistor, the 1080 costs 380% **more** than the 4080. My home -- which certainly doesn't have 7 times as many rooms as it did in 2017, has risen in price about 220% over the same period.
The differential is even more stark when one realizes those 1080 transistors are built on a 16nm node -- a facility that costs about one quarter as much as the 5nm foundry necessary to build a 4080. And it isn't simply the foundry costs. Design costs for a 5nm wafer are about 5 times higher than for 16nm.