OpenAI removes Scarlett Johansson-like voice from ChatGPT after actress hires legal counsel

midian182

Posts: 11,726   +177
Staff member
A hot potato: It was pretty obvious that the ChatGPT voice named Sky was meant to sound like Scarlett Johansson, the actress who voices AI virtual assistant Samantha in the movie Her. The company even approached Johansson to voice its new system, but she declined. Now, OpenAI has removed the flirty female voice after Johansson revealed her lawyers had contacted the firm.

OpenAI introduced its new GPT-4o model earlier this month. In addition to being "smarter" than its predecessor, it also features a very realistic voice assistant that speaks so quickly that the conversations feel like you're talking to a human.

As you can hear in the video below, the Sky voice sounds a lot like Scarlett Johansson. OpenAI boss Sam Altman, who previously said Her is his favorite movie, pretty much confirmed this was the aim when he tweeted "her" after his company announced GPT-4o.

OpenAI later said that Sky's voice is not an imitation of Scarlett Johansson but belongs to a different professional actress using her own natural speaking voice. It added that hundreds of voice-acting submissions were reviewed over a period of five months last year.

Johansson has now revealed that she was approached by OpenAI nine months ago to voice its latest ChatGPT update, but refused for "personal reasons." When she heard Sky, Johansson said she was "shocked" and "angered," noting that it "sounded so eerily similar to mine that my closest friends and news outlets could not tell the difference."

Johansson also highlighted how generative AI has contributed to the rise of disinformation and the theft of people's likeness without their consent. "In a time when we are all grappling with deepfakes and the protection of our own likeness, our own work, our own identities, I believe these are questions that deserve absolute clarity," she said.

Johansson added that when Altman approached her, he said, "he felt that by my voicing the system, I could bridge the gap between tech companies and creatives and help consumers to feel comfortable with the seismic shift concerning humans and AI. He said he felt that my voice would be comforting to people."

Altman contacted Johansson's agent just two days before Sky was released, asking the actress to reconsider her decision. In a statement shared to NPR, Johansson said she has now been "forced to hire legal counsel" and sent two letters to OpenAI inquiring how the Sky voice was made.

In a statement shared with multiple publications, Altman reiterated that the voice of Sky was never intended to resemble Johansson's. He added that Sky's voice actor was cast before any outreach to the Black Widow star. However, "Out of respect for Ms. Johansson, we have paused using Sky's voice in our products. We are sorry to Ms. Johansson that we didn't communicate better."

Permalink to story:

 
Does it sound similar to her voice? If you take away the nasal, maybe.

Is it close enough that she has an actual chance of winning? Probably not, considering it is still clearly someone else's voice. Though, internal documentation of creating the voice could be problematic lol

Nothing like a bit if legal flexing. However, it certainly has generated him some PR. So, who knows what his actual goal here was...
 
It's unforgivable that Sam Altman still had the nerve to hired someone else that sounded like Johanson after the actress declined to be part of it.

She should still sue him.
 
Does it sound similar to her voice? If you take away the nasal, maybe.

Is it close enough that she has an actual chance of winning? Probably not, considering it is still clearly someone else's voice. Though, internal documentation of creating the voice could be problematic lol

Nothing like a bit if legal flexing. However, it certainly has generated him some PR. So, who knows what his actual goal here was...
Obviously you haven't read her official statement....so your comment is as inaccurate as it could get.

Next time read the news and then comment.
 
Any way you look at it, using a persons voice, appearance, etc. without their expressed permission and/or compensation is simply theft and should be handled by the courts accordingly. Large corporations and end users already make an obscene amount of profit which would not be possible without the talent and their well established audience base.
 
Obviously you haven't read her official statement....so your comment is as inaccurate as it could get.

Next time read the news and then comment.
I did, so what's the inaccuracy?

Nothing about my initial comment changes based on your vague reply.
 
Does it sound similar to her voice? If you take away the nasal, maybe.

Is it close enough that she has an actual chance of winning? Probably not, considering it is still clearly someone else's voice. Though, internal documentation of creating the voice could be problematic lol

Nothing like a bit if legal flexing. However, it certainly has generated him some PR. So, who knows what his actual goal here was...
Your voice has some characteristics that can be recognized even if you change your tone and pitch.
 
I did, so what's the inaccuracy?

Nothing about my initial comment changes based on your vague reply.
You were questioning if the Ai-bot "even sounded like her" ....if you have read her official statement you wouldn't even have questioned it in your comment as if she didn't have a legal argument about it.
 
You were questioning if the Ai-bot "even sounded like her" ....if you have read her official statement you wouldn't even have questioned it in your comment as if she didn't have a legal argument about it.
I did not say it didn't sound similar to her.
Don't put words in my mouth.
 
Last edited:
Your voice has some characteristics that can be recognized even if you change your tone and pitch.
So, no one is allowed to sound remotely like someone else? Is that what you're implying?

The first time I heard it, I didn't get any SJ (and had no bias to listen for it). Hearing it again above, I had to look up her performance in that movie, and I still didn't hear enough of a resemblance that I would say it's her (I have reasonable doubt). If anything, it reminded me she has a nasally voice and also was being flirty lol
 
Last edited:
So, no one is allowed to sound remotely like someone else? Is that what you're implying?

The first time I heard it, I didn't get any SJ (and had no bias to listen for it). Hearing it again above, I had to look up her performance in that movie, and I still didn't hear enough of a resemblance that I would say it's her (I have reasonable doubt). If anything, it reminded me she has a nasally voice and also was being flirty lol
I didn't say or imply you're not allowed to sound like someone else, but considering SJ was contacted by Altman directly in several occasions and all the other coincidences, he wanted the SJ voice badly, to the point he hired someone to somewhat imitate her voice/style. The fact the company decided to drop it means they did it out of respect or because they wanted to avoid going down the legal hole.
 
Wholly **** that is so deep into the uncanny valley for me. It sounds so natural, and so ****ing artificial at the same time.
 
Back