Opinion: The blurring lines of 5G

Bob O'Donnell

Posts: 81   +1
Staff member

On the eve of the world’s largest trade show dedicated to all things telecom—Mobile World Congress (MWC), which will be held next week in beautiful Barcelona, Spain—everyone is extraordinarily focused on the next big industry transition: the move to 5G.

The interest and excitement about this critical new network standard is palpable. After years of hypothetical discussions, we’re finally starting to see practical test results, helped along by companies like National Instruments, being discussed, and realistic timelines being revealed by major chip suppliers like Qualcomm and Intel, phone makers like Samsung, network equipment providers like Ericsson, as well as the major carriers, such as AT&T and Verizon.

To be clear, we won’t be seeing the unveiling of smartphones with 5G modems that we can actually purchase, and the mobile networks necessary to support them until around next year’s show—and even those will be more bleeding edge examples—but we’ve clearly moved past the “I’m pretty sure we’re going to make it” stage to the “let’s start making plans” stage. That’s a big step for everyone involved.

These industry transitions only occur about once a decade, so they are important demarcations, particularly in an industry that moves as fast as the tech industry does.

As with the transition from 2G to 3G and 3G to 4G, there’s no question that the move to 5G is also a big moment. These industry transitions only occur about once a decade, so they are important demarcations, particularly in an industry that moves as fast as the tech industry does.

The transition to 5G will not only bring faster network connection speeds—as most everyone expects—but also more reliable connections in a wider variety of places, particularly in dense urban environments. As connectivity has grown to be so crucial for so many devices, the need for consistent connections is arguably even more important than faster speeds, and that consistency is one of the key promises that we’re expecting to see from 5G.

In addition, the range of devices that are expected to be connected to 5G networks is also growing wider. Automobiles, in particular, are going to be a critical part of 5G networks in the next decade, especially as more assisted, semi-autonomous and (eventually) fully autonomous cars start relying on critical connections between cars and with other road-related infrastructure to help them function more safely.

As exciting as these developments promise to be, however, it’s also becoming increasingly clear that the switchover from 4G to 5G will be far from a clean, distinct break. In fact, 5G networks will still be very dependent on 4G network infrastructure—not only in the early days when 5G coverage will be limited and 4G will be an essential fallback option—but even well into the middle of the 2020s and likely beyond.

A lot of tremendous work has been done to build a robust 4G LTE network around the world and the 5G network designers have wisely chosen to leverage this existing work as they transition to next generation standards. In fact, ironically, just before the big 5G blowout that most are expecting at this year’s MWC trade show, we’re seeing some big announcements around 4G.

The latest modem from Qualcomm—the X24, for example, isn’t a 5G model (though they’re previously announced X50 modem is expected to be the first commercial modem that will comply with the recently ratified 5G NR “New Radio” standard), but rather a further refinement of 4G. Offering theoretical download speeds of up to 2 Gbps thanks to 7X carrier aggregation—a technology that allows multiple chunks of radio bandwidth to function as a single data “pipe”—the X24 may likely, in fact, offer even faster connection speeds than early 5G networks will enable. In theory, first generation 5G networks should go up to 4 Gbps and even higher, but thanks to the complexities of network infrastructure and other practical realities, real-world numbers are likely to be well below that in early incarnations.

Of course, this is nothing new. In other major network transitions, we saw relatively similar phenomena, where the last refinements to the old network standards were actually a bit better than the first iterations of the new ones.

In addition, a great deal of additional device connectivity will likely be on networks other than official 5G for some time. Standards like NB-IoT and Cat M1 for Internet of Things (IoT) applications actually ride on 4G LTE networks, and there’s little need (nor any serious standards work being done yet) to bring these over to 5G. Even in automotive, though momentum is rapidly changing, the “official” standard for vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) connections in the US is still DSRC, and the first cars with it embedded into them just came out this year. DSRC is a nearly 20-year old technology, however, and was designed well before the idea of autonomous cars became more of a reality. As a result, it isn’t likely to last as the standard much longer given the dramatically increased network connectivity demands that even semi-autonomous automobiles will create. Still, it highlights yet another example of the challenges to evolve to a truly 5G world.

There is no question that 5G is coming and that it will be impactful. However, it’s important to remember that the lines separating current and next generation telecom network standards are a lot blurrier than they may first appear.

Bob O’Donnell is the founder and chief analyst of TECHnalysis Research, LLC a technology consulting and market research firm. You can follow him on Twitter . This article was originally published on Tech.pinions.

Masthead image credit: Android Authority

Permalink to story.

 
Current Cell Towers just struggling with 4G/4G LTE tech. 5G going to improve things for us. But the there are a lot of dead areas for coverage. Shouldn't the focus be on improving coverage first.
 
Right! Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile can't even get 4G to work was well as their hype (or is it false advertising?) says. Also, I have yet to see anything concrete and definitive explaining the details of any 5G rollout, how they cover the widely varying topology of this country, etc. 5G may even be worse than IOT or Microsoft for what it does not say.
 
Don't hold your breath - - the specification is still in a MASSIVE state of flux.
 
Most of these projections seem to ignore constant population growth in the high tech user community. I'm not saying it will have any kind of drastic impact, but one has to wonder why they don't include those projections in their numbers. I still remember over two decades when they talked about having Wifi broadcast from a single tower in each city with a range of over 50 miles .... then it suddenly was not financially feasible ..... makes me wonder if 5G is going to be real or just another marketing ploy ...
 
Well, this is interesting - - AT&T to begin trials!
Dallas, Atlanta, and Waco will be the first cities to receive 5G services in 2018 under AT&T, with the carrier also launching a new test lab in Austin to trial its proprietary 5G technology.

excerpt: http://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-announces-5g-mobile-trial-platform/

At launch, the 5G platform will support 3GPP NR early interoperability; the 600-900MHz, 3.3-4.2GHz, 4.4-4.9GHz, 5.1-5.9GHz, 28GHz, and 39GHz spectrum bands; and a mobile interoperability solution for end-to-end 5G field testing.​

excerpt: http://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-unveils-5g-modem-suite/
Initially, when 5G networks are deployed worldwide, many of the networks will start with non-standalone configuration -- although some operators may choose to start with standalone -- and eventually migrate to standalone. It's important for a commercial device from day one to support both network configurations," Chenwei Yan, ‎VP and GM of Connected Products at Intel Client Computing Group, explained in a call with media.

"The second element to the multi-mode story is that we support in addition to 5G the various 2G, 3G, and 4G legacy air interface modes. And this is significant because for operators, from day one at least, there won't be ubiquitous 5G coverage, and in places where 5G coverage is not available, the device still has to work."​
 
I think the introduction of 5G will be the type of game changer that 3G was to 2G...not because it helps us download faster....but because as the devices around us become smarter...not all of these devices will have access to fast wifi...and 5G will bring out a technological revolution once it matures and becomes more mainstream with coverage
 
Back