The Oscars just declared that AI actors and AI-written scripts can't win awards

midian182

Posts: 11,697   +177
Staff member
A hot potato: With generative AI becoming more prevalent in society, are we heading toward a future where an AI-created actor or script wins an Oscar? If it does ever happen, it certainly won't be anytime soon: the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences has just banned their eligibility for awards.

The Academy clarified rules for two categories related to AI, writes Vanity Fair. The first states that the only acting roles eligible for Oscar nominations are those "demonstrably performed by humans with their consent." Screenplays, meanwhile, must be human-authored to be eligible.

While this all sounds like something we'll have to deal with in the future, it's happening now. It was reported in March that the late Top Gun actor Val Kilmer was being digitally resurrected in AI-generated form to star in a movie called As Deep as the Grave. He originally signed on in 2020 but was unable to film any scenes due to his battle with throat cancer.

We've also seen actors brought back to life digitally to reprise old roles, including Ian Holm in Alien: Romulus four years after his death, and Peter Cushing in 2016's Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, which led to a lawsuit against Disney that was dismissed in December.

Then there's Tilly Norwood, the AI-generated "actor" unveiled last year to plenty of anger from SAG-AFTRA. The Dutch production company behind Norwood argued that audiences are more invested in a film's story than in its actors, and therefore, performers could easily be AI-generated.

As for scripts, there was Sunspring, starring Silicon Valley's Thomas Middleditch and directed by Oscar Sharp back in 2016. Its AI-generated script received praise at the time, though the film is now ten years old and the technology has moved on considerably. The same AI bot wrote a follow-up called It's No Game, starring David Hasselhoff, a year later.

The clarification doesn't mean any movie that uses generative AI is automatically out of the running. The Academy's new language allows the organization to ask for more information about how AI was used and where human authorship begins and ends. It means that AI-assisted visual effects, voice tools, de-aging, or other production tech should not by themselves make a film ineligible, assuming the nominated acting or writing work still comes from humans.

Hollywood's 2023 strikes put AI protections at the center of contract talks, and studios are now experimenting with tools that can clone voices, generate faces, and polish scripts. It seems the Academy is drawing its line before more concerns arise.

Permalink to story:

 
Good!
Finally someone making decisions that make sense.

Awards are meant to be obtained through the effort and dedication of human beings, not through a glorified projection of someone that doesn't exist or no longer alive to perform the actual work.
 
Those awards are meaningless anyways… producers are far more concerned with how much money their film will make.. if AI gives more money, they’ll use it.

As for human screenplays… I’ve seen Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus and all of the Sharknado movies… anyone who thinks AI can’t write better screenplays than humans needs to watch more movies…
 
Humanity has a long history of banning outside tribes, "the Other," from participating on an equal footing in society.
 
Meh. Nobody cares about the Oscars anyway. Even as their viewership tumbled and Hollywood lost relevance, they instituted rules a few years ago that if you didnt spout modern DEI politics and have the right mix of races and sexes in your characters, you would not be eligible for an Oscar nomination. They bit HARD into the crazy hamburger of modern politics and condemned themselves to be irrelevant Reddit fodder.

Unsurprisingly they hate AI, since AI can do a far better job then they can at writing the same story over an dover changing as little as possible to avoid lawsuits and making horrible garbage that nobody likes. Their entire grift-o-sphere is falling apart and they are desperate to maintain some semblance of control.
 
Those awards are meaningless anyways… producers are far more concerned with how much money their film will make.. if AI gives more money, they’ll use it.

As for human screenplays… I’ve seen Mega Shark vs Giant Octopus and all of the Sharknado movies… anyone who thinks AI can’t write better screenplays than humans needs to watch more movies…
Have you seen Sharknado win any Oscars or Golden Globes?....point made.
 
Have you seen Sharknado win any Oscars or Golden Globes?....point made.
But they made money - that was MY point...

Look at all of the movies that have the highest grosses over the last decade (or more)... virtually all of them are sequels, novel adaptations, or otherwise "schlock" that an AI could easily write... Hollywood might publicly declare "AI bad"... but they will embrace it because it can't do any worse - and will do it cheaper.
 
Last edited:
Suicide Squad and Black Panther Wakanda Forever won Oscars, and Artemis Fowl and Borderlands won Golden Globes....Point Deflected.
Suicide squad: Winner for Best Hair and Makeup.

Black Panther Wakanda Forever: Winner for Best Costume Design.

Nothing to do with Special Effects or writing.

My point made again and again.....
 
Suicide squad: Winner for Best Hair and Makeup.

Black Panther Wakanda Forever: Winner for Best Costume Design.

Nothing to do with Special Effects or writing.

My point made again and again.....
What is the point you're trying to make here? That the quality of special effects and writing can be determined by Oscars and Golden Globes? Because you just demonstrated the exact opposite, that winning these awards in no way means the movies are good, which is the point you're trying to argue against.

All you did was prove yourself wrong. The Oscars/Globes are meaningless awards for pointless things that in no way indicate a movie's quality, and thus most people just flat out ignore them.
 
Last edited:
Suicide squad: Winner for Best Hair and Makeup.

Black Panther Wakanda Forever: Winner for Best Costume Design.

Nothing to do with Special Effects or writing.

My point made again and again.....
So… in the future we’ll have awards like “best screenplay written by an AI” or “best AI actor”…

The awards are only meaningful to those who receive them (and get nominated). Very few extra tickets get sold for a movie that wins “best screenplay”… in fact, box office revenue is almost always driven by the exact opposite.. how many of the top grossing movies in the past decade received any acting/writing Oscars?
 
What is the point you're trying to make here? That the quality of special effects and writing can be determined by Oscars and Golden Globes? Because you just demonstrated the exact opposite, that winning these awards in no way means the movies are good, which is the point you're trying to argue against.

All you did was prove yourself wrong. The Oscars/Globes are meaningless awards for pointless things that in no way indicate a movie's quality, and thus most people just flat out ignore them.

I think what The Talking Tech means is that an award should be reserved for human labour and excellence. A rubbish film can have outstanding qualities, decoupled from its stature as a film. To take one example of many, Flashdance was a disaster but won Best Original Song in 1983. "What a Feeling" was, indeed, timeless.

The mentioned Makeup and Costume awards were due to physical human labour, rather than generative AI, notwithstanding their films being lacklustre.

For my part, I don't put much stock on the Oscars. Titanic and Oppenheimer were showered with awards, but I'm not fond of either. On the other hand, there is brilliance like Mulholland Drive winning nothing at the Academy Awards, Hitchcock never winning Best Director, etc., etc. At any rate, one can't deny there being a correlation between the greatest films and a higher number of Oscar nominations and winnings.
 
If "The Oscars" really want to fix, at least in part, their complete irrelevance, they should urgently get rid of the DEI id1ocy in the first place.
Nowadays having an Oscar hurts the box office because the movie is automatically assumed to be a DEI bul1shit.
AI is a potential threat to Hollywood in the long term, but wokism / DEI is destroying it here and now.
 
Oscars is infected with the same virus Hwood is. They are losing money and cannot stop. And Oscars exist just to convince the audience that the products Hwood makes are of a better value than they are in reality.
 
Seems way too easy to have AI assist in script-writing at whatever level (even writing the entire thing) and then never reveal that fact to anyone. Wasn't there a guy who recently won a photography contest using an AI-generated image, and then used his win to later reveal how easy it was to do this while taking credit himself? I don't see how banning AI is even mildly effective here.
 
Back