I believe I read somewhere Samsung said they weren't interested in licensing BB, that their focus is Android.
If Samsung doesn't do it, I don't believe HTC will. Motorola is out of the question as it is owned by Google, so leaves who then? Pantech? Lol.
LG is a possible solution, but their horrible reputation after pumping out bad device after bad device certainly leaves much to be desired. LG seems to make appliances and TVs just fine, but smartphones have been known to be poorly supported and usually with poor design. Actual hardware seems to be consistent, but reviews on professional tech sites are certainly not in LG's overall favor. I doubt RIM would consider licensing BB10 to them, but it's a possibility.
Even then, though: LG Bold? Haha, no.
I know it seems rather easy to just hate on RIM, but from how things are looking there's two things that should be kept in mind:
1) RIM will not produce anything revolutionary <I>enough</I> with BB10 to make OEMs want to license it. I'm sure it will be impressive, but not <I>that</I>.
2) The only really profitable Android OEM is Samsung, and if they don't want to do it, other OEMs will most likely follow suit.
That leaves us with the inevitable demise of the BB brand as potential licencees are uninterested in licensing, and "not-so-potential" licencees are. While other, lesser known asian OEMs might consider licensing it, it will never be enough to dethrone Android or even WP7 who has seen impressive growth in countries like China. But guess why though? Because Samsung, ZTE and Nokia are backing it. Except Nokia, all aforementioned OEMs also are backing Android. BB10, not so much.
