Risk management means destroying all decommissioned hard drives

Shawn Knight

Posts: 15,292   +192
Staff member
Bottom line: Millions of hard drives are retired annually when their warranties expire, even if they are still in perfect operating condition. The overwhelming majority of these drives are not sent in for refurbishing or otherwise repurposed. Rather, they are destroyed.

The Circular Drive Initiative (CDI), a consortium of technology companies promoting the reuse of storage hardware, estimates that nine out of 10 drives are destroyed upon decommission.

Most large companies work with IT Asset Disposition (ITAD) firms to properly dispose of used storage devices, some of which could contain highly sensitive data like trade secrets. For both parties, the name of the game is risk management.

The IEEE last year set its Standard for Sanitizing Storage, a three-tier approach to dealing with storage devices. Level one involves simply erasing data, which could be recovered using specialized tools. This method is sufficient for those wanting to reuse a drive in their company but would not suffice for those planning to resell the drive to another company. Level two, called purging, overwrites "deleted" data with new data to ensure it is not recoverable. Stage three consists of physically destroying the drive by incineration, ensuring there is no way the data or the drive can be recovered.

The latter may seem extreme but apparently it is necessary. According to CDI secretary and treasurer Jonmichael Hands, shredding hard drives may not be enough to thwart a determined hacker. A person with the right tools and know-how could glean data off a platter as small as 3mm, Hands said.

For major cloud service providers like the ones Hands spoke with, the nuclear option is the only option. "They have a zero-risk policy. It can't be one in a million drives, one in 10 million drives, one in 100 million drives that leaks. It has to be zero."

Still, others are pushing for the safe and secure reuse of hard drives. Storage specialist Seagate, a founding member of the CDI, refurbished and resold 1.16 million HDDs and SSDs in financial year 2022. The effort kept more than 540 tons of electronic waste out of landfills.

Amy Zuckerman, sustainability and transformation director at Seagate, said refurbished drives are tested and recertified with a new five- or seven-year warranty. Customers for these drives typically include smaller data centers and crypto mining operations, she said. It is unclear how many times a drive can be refurbished and reused, but Zuckerman said they are currently shooting for double use.

Hard drives that are not fit for refurbishment can be disassembled and salvaged for parts, and raw materials can be recycled.

Storage devices aren't the only pieces of hardware one must be concerned about with regard to risk management. Back in April, researchers from cybersecurity firm ESET acquired nearly 20 used routers and found intact configuration data on more than half of them.

Tony Anscombe, chief security evangelist at ESET, recommends companies sanitize devices themselves as best they can before handing them over to third party sanitation or e-waste disposal firms.

Image credit: Ivo Brasil

Permalink to story.

 
Those who think that secure erase is insufficient for data protection, please provide a PoC before crying wolf. Until that happens, this continues to be just a complete waste of resources.
 
Can't wait until price of entry sata ssd is equivalent to a normal consumer 3.5" HDD. destroying the drive would be much easier then.

where I live at the moment 4TB 3.5" HDD is going for about the same price as a 2TB 2.5" SSD.
 
Those who think that secure erase is insufficient for data protection, please provide a PoC before crying wolf. Until that happens, this continues to be just a complete waste of resources.
destroying the drives is cheaper than the consequences of a potential data leak due to human error. There was someone on here who talks about how he decommissions drives and that he never makes mistakes. Here's the thing, I would never hire a person that claims to "never make mistakes"
 
When we take drives out of equipment, I take them apart, save the magnets and crush the platters.
I have about 5 pounds worth of magnets LOL.
I had a suspicion that I was not the only one who did this. I've repurposed those actuator arm magnets for several things, they're great, especially ones from older drives (think 20+ years ago) since they are massive.
 
destroying the drives is cheaper than the consequences of a potential data leak due to human error. There was someone on here who talks about how he decommissions drives and that he never makes mistakes. Here's the thing, I would never hire a person that claims to "never make mistakes"


All about protocol.. If you follow the steps you can't go wrong.

Ive done data recovery for some years and it suprised me how most tools are actually incapable of "properly" shredding the data onto a drive.

You really need to overwrite it up to 15 to 30 times in order to be fully effective.

 
All about protocol.. If you follow the steps you can't go wrong.

Ive done data recovery for some years and it suprised me how most tools are actually incapable of "properly" shredding the data onto a drive.

You really need to overwrite it up to 15 to 30 times in order to be fully effective.
protocols are in place because human error exists. If those protocols were 100% effective then companies that have hundreds of millions of dollars of drives would choose to "recycle" them rather than destroy them. After all, a corporation has a duty to the share holders and can literally be sued by them if they don't act in the best interest of the shareholder. If Google, Amazon web services or others thought the risk was cost effective to recycle and resell drives then they would because they have a legal obligation to the shareholders.

But we're getting to larger and larger drives, how long would it take to wipe a 10TB drive 30 times? What's the electricity cost of wiping 1,000, 10TB drives 30 times? The NAS servers are probably fine, but they'll be put out of commission because they're needed to do the wipes. I know it's usually 24, but lets say 25 to make the math easy. Suddenly you have 40 NAS servers you can't profit from because they're all being used to securely erase all the data from those drives. With the real kicker being you still have to deal with human error.

The only people really mad about this are people who want cheap, used enterprise drives on ebay and that's not a huge market.
 
Such a shame. Those enterprise drives are reliable and can run for a very long time providing cheap but reliable storage.
 
I actually work with erasing and refurbishing used computers and been doing that for the last 11 years.
We do destroy a lot of hard drives... but it's more like the opposite numbers than this article say. we sell 90% and destroy 10%. And that is only broken hard drives that either doesn't work or have remapped or damaged sectors.
When we destroy it is degaussing and then throw them in a chip machine so its just tiny metal flakes left in a big bin that is off to being melted down. There is no way of getting any information from that.
But the rest we erase and sell. usually still inside the computers that we have cleaned and diagnosed.
Also we only work with enterprise hardware/customers.
There are a few different erasure standards that has been purposed over the years but the current and most up to date in IEEE 2883-2022. I've not read that unfortunately but I know that we are certified for it.

With that said... Erasing the data, with the right software, is safe. I've personally handle/handled computers from major companies, security groups, hospitals, governmental agencies and even some parliaments.
 
Reduce after-warranty drive wastage by providing longer warranties so companies aren't tossing perfectly good drives just because a calendar says so. This is probably a freebie as most drives (except ironically Seagates!) will last far longer than their standard warranty period even under heavy load.
 
Those who think that secure erase is insufficient for data protection, please provide a PoC before crying wolf. Until that happens, this continues to be just a complete waste of resources.
You might want to read this paper on sanitizing storage, https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/fast11/tech/full_papers/Wei.pdf


TL;DR
The conclusion states

Sanitizing storage media to reliably destroy data is an essential aspect of overall data security. We have empirically measured the effectiveness of hard drive-centric sanitization techniques on flash-based SSDs. For sanitizing entire disks, built-in sanitize commands are effective when implemented correctly, and software techniques work most, but not all, of the time. We found that none of the available software techniques for sanitizing individual files were effective.

To remedy this problem, we described and evaluated three simple extensions to an existing FTL that make file sanitization fast and effective. Overall, we conclude that the increased complexity of SSDs relative to hard drives requires that SSDs provide verifiable sanitization operations.
 
I'd like to propose stage 4 as friendlier to the environment. My stage 4 is simply complete disassembly of a drive, removing the read-write heads, neodymium magnets and disk platters. All of King Charlie's hoses and all his men could not a drive back together after full disassembly.

Also, I might add that some recyclers feed drives into a large noisy machine that simply grinds then up.
 
Those who think that secure erase is insufficient for data protection, please provide a PoC before crying wolf. Until that happens, this continues to be just a complete waste of resources.
Completely agree, this practice is incredibly wasteful. Drive-wiping is easy, quick and effective. This kind of waste should be illegal.
 
Back