RTX 60 series leaks are everywhere, but Nvidia hasn't finalized the GPUs yet

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,994   +58
Staff
Highly anticipated: Rumors around Nvidia's Rubin-based GeForce RTX 60 series are picking up pace, but the latest wave of supposed spec leaks is already facing pushback. Most serious outlets will urge readers to take the latest wave of RTX 60 "leaks" with a big grain of salt, even as early technical chatter around Nvidia's next gaming architecture begins to surface.

According to VideoCardz and other sources, detailed specifications for Rubin-based gaming GPUs simply don't exist in finalized form yet, that's despite a flood of confident claims circulating across social media and YouTube last weekend.

As Nvidia's big focus remains on AI hardware, Nvidia is still working with internal board numbers rather than public-facing SKU names, meaning any report confidently labeling parts as RTX 6090, RTX 6080, or RTX 6070 should be treated as speculative at best. Clock speeds remain undefined, and Rubin chips intended for GeForce cards reportedly haven't even taped out yet.

On that basis, VideoCardz is framing any detailed "spec sheet" currently making the rounds as educated guesswork rather than information grounded in company guidance. More credible signals – covering clocks, performance, and memory – are expected to emerge later in development, particularly once established leakers like Kopite7kimi begin publishing data that can be independently cross-checked.

Still, the rumor mill is already producing granular Rubin claims that enthusiasts are eagerly dissecting. Early chatter suggests Nvidia may stick to its roughly two-year GeForce cadence, with the RTX 60-series built on Rubin GPUs derived from the same architecture already deployed in the company's AI hardware stack.

On the manufacturing side, the gaming chips are most likely to usea TSMC's 3 nm FinFET process rather than a more aggressive sub-2 nm nanosheet node, potentially via a custom variant similar to how "Nvidia 4N" was tuned from TSMC's 5nm tech.

Under this scenario, Rubin parts would carry "GR20x" die identifiers – such as "GR202" for the flagship – and target GPU frequencies in the high-2 GHz to low-3 GHz range. That would translate into relatively modest clock gains over today's Blackwell-based GeForce hardware.

Feature-wise, Rubin is expected to introduce 6th generation Tensor cores and 5th generation RT cores. The updated Tensor blocks, paired with higher overall compute throughput, are expected to improve neural rendering and could help bring DLSS 5 (so far demonstrated using two RTX 5090 GPUs) within reach of a single card, potentially expanding support beyond flagship models.

Meanwhile, the next-gen RT cores are said to target a doubling of real-time path tracing performance compared to the RTX 50 series.

Rasterization gains, by contrast, are expected to be more incremental. Leaks point to SKU-to-SKU improvements in the 30-35% range over Blackwell, driven by architectural refinements, higher clocks, and efficiency gains from the 3nm node rather than major increases in die size.

Memory configurations could see more meaningful shifts. A rumored RTX 6090 based on "GR202" would retain a 512-bit GDDR7 interface, feature 192 streaming multiprocessors on the full die (with some disabled on shipping cards), and pack 32 GB of memory, potentially with faster GDDR7 speeds to push bandwidth higher.

A supposed RTX 6080 built around "GR203" is described with a 320-bit GDDR7 bus, 20GB of memory, and at least 25% more bandwidth than the RTX 5080. Further down the stack, a "GR205" RTX 6070 is rumored to move to a 256-bit GDDR7 interface with 16 GB of memory, delivering a bandwidth increase of at least one-third over its predecessor.

Permalink to story:

 
They'll discontinue the 0060 series altogether. The 6070 will have 8GB of VRAM and start at $1000. You will need 2 of them to run DLSS5.
They are not going to discontinue their highest selling card line, especially if we are to believe EVGA that lower end cards have higher margins.

You are far more likely to see the xx9x and xx8x lines discontinued before the xx6x.
 
They are not going to discontinue their highest selling card line, especially if we are to believe EVGA that lower end cards have higher margins.

You are far more likely to see the xx9x and xx8x lines discontinued before the xx6x.
It'll exist, but be impossible to my get. And the 70 series is the new 60 series, especially if you go by die size. Shrinkflation is hitting GPUs
 
Kinda a waste. The biggest issue with the 5060 and 5060Ti 8GB cards is the x8 interface
Nope. 8GB is obsolete, that x8 bus would work fine if you were not running out of VRAM. 16GB cards don't have issues with x8 busses. Hmmmm....
It'll exist, but be impossible to my get. And the 70 series is the new 60 series, especially if you go by die size. Shrinkflation is hitting GPUs
If you go by die size the xx6x is the new xx9x, depending on your frame of reference.

Meanwhile back in reality, the xx6x isn't going anywhere.
 
+30% is pretty easy with the node shrink.

The real question is how much do the latest architecture improvements for AI also help gaming? Because that’s where the focus and R&D at Nvidia is. That’s what will determine if this is a good or great upgrade in performance (price is another matter).
 
So what ... at 8gb ram I do not want any of them, and im not paying 1000$ for a 6070 with 16gb of ram .. very few people will buy these.
 
Nope. 8GB is obsolete, that x8 bus would work fine if you were not running out of VRAM. 16GB cards don't have issues with x8 busses. Hmmmm....
If you go by die size the xx6x is the new xx9x, depending on your frame of reference.
Aside from it’s not and tests prove this? On a 70 series or above sure but the silicon on a 60 series isn’t fast enough for it to matter.
Meanwhile back in reality, the xx6x isn't going anywhere.
 
If you go by die size the xx6x is the new xx9x, depending on your frame of reference.

Meanwhile back in reality, the xx6x isn't going anywhere
Putting a frame of reference in reality, die sizes and percent of the full die has only been getting smaller. Not even the xx90 gets the full die.

The xx60 would be the first to go, jacket man could easily sell the budget gaming sector on Geforce Now instead.
 
It's not worth to spend your lifetime savings on a stupid xx90 card to play so-called new games that are either another sequel or another remake or a totally boring new game with so-called realistic graphics.

Anyway, the RTX 6xxx "leaks" are supposed to be everywhere "today".
 
Well - pure rumors at this point. But one thing is clear: We'll no longer see "massive" increase in Raster performance - it's all " secondary features" like Tensor cores that will see an evolution.
 
Given the state of the 50 series I wouldn't get too excited. 8GB 6060 with 8 fake frames per real one anybody?
 
From The Witcher 4 tech demo they claim that it was running on a "standard PS5 at 60 FPS with ray tracing". For some reason I won't trust a 5080 to run this game at 1440P Ultra with comfortable FPS, I'd put my faith in a 6080.
 
Given the state of the 50 series I wouldn't get too excited. 8GB 6060 with 8 fake frames per real one anybody?
This.

I don't expect anything from NV for gamers. It's all A.I. I feel we are an inconvenience for them.
Still they don't mind making a few, likely modest gaming performance increase. Likely Massive price increases. Price increases are the only sure thing that will be "enhanced."
 
Until they start making standard cards 16GB Default, 6070 with 24GB, 6090 32GB....not worth upgrading till at least base VRAM is 16GB
 
Back