Scarlett Johansson calls for AI legislation after viral deepfake video

midian182

Posts: 11,726   +177
Staff member
WTF?! Scarlett Johansson, who has previously spoken out against the misuse of AI, is now calling for the US government to pass legislation that protects people against this practice. It comes after the Black Widow actress and several other celebrities appeared in an AI-generated video that went viral.

The video in question was created by an Instagram user who calls themselves a generative-AI expert in their bio. It is a response to Kanye West's Super Bowl ad, in which the rapper bought ad space during the game to increase traffic to his website. After the ad aired, West changed the site into a storefront that contained a single item: a white T-shirt with a swastika. Shopify removed the storefront soon after it went live.

The response video features AI-generated versions of Johansson, Drake, Natalie Portman, Jerry Seinfeld, Steven Spielberg, Sam Altman, Mark Zuckerberg, Woody Allen, and several other Jewish celebrities. They are all wearing white T-shirts with a cartoon hand featuring a Star of David in the middle, showing the middle finger. The word "Kanye" is written underneath.

Like most modern generative AI videos, this one has convinced many people that it's the real celebs taking part. It does have the usual signs that it's the work of an AI, such as the blurriness, occasional weird hands, and uncanny valley faces, but not everyone will notice them. The video ends with "Enough is Enough" and "Join the Fight Against Antisemitism."

Johansson said in the statement that while she has no tolerance for antisemitism or hate speech of any kind, she does "firmly believe that the potential for hate speech multiplied by AI is a far greater threat than any one person who takes accountability for it. We must call out the misuse of AI, no matter its messaging, or we risk losing a hold on reality."

"I have unfortunately been a very public victim of AI, but the truth is that the threat of AI affects each and every one of us," she added.

Back in 2019, Johansson slammed deepfaked porn videos that superimposed her face onto adult actresses' bodies. The Avengers star appeared in many of these videos, including one that has been viewed over 1.5 million times.

"Nothing can stop someone from cutting and pasting my image or anyone else's onto a different body and making it look as eerily realistic as desired," she said. "The fact is that trying to protect yourself from the Internet and its depravity is basically a lost cause [...] The Internet is a vast wormhole of darkness that eats itself."

Johansson also had a run-in with OpenAI last year when the voice for the GPT-4o model featured a voice assistant, Sky, that sounded a lot like her. Johansson said she was approached by OpenAI nine months earlier to voice Sky but said no. She added that she had been "forced to hire legal counsel" as a result of the similarities.

"There is a 1,000-foot wave coming regarding AI that several progressive countries, not including the United States, have responded to in a responsible manner. It is terrifying that the U.S. government is paralyzed when it comes to passing legislation that protects all of its citizens against the imminent dangers of AI," Johansson said in her recent statement.

"I urge the U.S. government to make the passing of legislation limiting AI use a top priority; it is a bipartisan issue that enormously affects the immediate future of humanity at large."

Permalink to story:

 
Unless the legislation is worldwide, it won’t matter.

It’s hard to legislate against something in one country when all the perpetrators have to do is move locations to continue their actions… the internet makes this even tougher as a VPN can be almost as effective as a physical move.
 
Do we really need special AI laws to cover this? Wouldn't the existing laws regarding defamation, slander, and libel cover this sort case well enough? Granted, those laws are really hard to enforce against random people on the internet, but the same would be true of any special AI laws.
 
Unless the legislation is worldwide, it won’t matter.

It’s hard to legislate against something in one country when all the perpetrators have to do is move locations to continue their actions… the internet makes this even tougher as a VPN can be almost as effective as a physical move.
Exactly. Laws aren't a spell. The US can pass a deepfake law that will have zero impact on people in other countries making deepfakes.
 
Unless the legislation is worldwide, it won’t matter.

It’s hard to legislate against something in one country when all the perpetrators have to do is move locations to continue their actions… the internet makes this even tougher as a VPN can be almost as effective as a physical move.
That's totally true, local laws can be easily bypassed with VPNs and other methods. However, any regulation needs to be very carefully thought out. If we could enforce global AI regulations, we’d likely end up with a fragmented, over-regulated internet that stifles both innovation and freedom. Pushing for a global framework might force us to sacrifice the openness that has always been the backbone of the internet, simply giving more control to monopolistic corporations and leading us down an even more dystopian path.
 
Watched the video - I don't know who half the people are in it, but the ones I recognize they're too young looking for the age they actually are. All of them in that video look 10-15 years younger than they really are.

Also, I don't need a video of anyone showing the finger to Kanye West. His music was never any good (so I can't understand how he even got as big as he has) and he's constant grab for attention is sad and pathetic. Do what I do, ignore the fruitcake.
 
Don't be bother by the facts, or are Trump's supporters now against the First Amendment they constantly argued it has been taken from them?

How the tables have turned.....


For a "Top 1% Poster" you sure do like to jump to conclusions without any factual basis. I am not surprised that you think your opinions are facts. With that, I actually agree with Scarlett's position on unregulated AI. There does need to be some regulations on containing AI and I am glad she is bringing awareness to it. You are automatically placing the blame on Trump as if he made the deepfake himself proves my point earlier.
 
For a "Top 1% Poster" you sure do like to jump to conclusions without any factual basis. I am not surprised that you think your opinions are facts. With that, I actually agree with Scarlett's position on unregulated AI. There does need to be some regulations on containing AI and I am glad she is bringing awareness to it. You are automatically placing the blame on Trump as if he made the deepfake himself proves my point earlier.
He actually simply claimed that Trump wouldn't do anything about it, not that he caused it... The thing is, the actual president won't matter for this kind of thing - Trump (or Biden, Clinton, Obama, Bush, etc) would be able to do very little to curtail this.

What Trump HAS done is provide an environment where certain people, who would normally do nothing, all of a sudden feel that it's OK to express hate and violence - both for causes supported and not supported by Trump's regime. He has polarized your nation - it will be interesting to see what happens in a decade or so...
 
He actually simply claimed that Trump wouldn't do anything about it, not that he caused it... The thing is, the actual president won't matter for this kind of thing - Trump (or Biden, Clinton, Obama, Bush, etc) would be able to do very little to curtail this.

What Trump HAS done is provide an environment where certain people, who would normally do nothing, all of a sudden feel that it's OK to express hate and violence - both for causes supported and not supported by Trump's regime. He has polarized your nation - it will be interesting to see what happens in a decade or so...

An overcorrection from a prior administration incapable of objectivity, and the past 4 years of Biden pushing policies that are too far left for the general public. The pendulum is swinging back the other way now, as it always will. If anything's proof of this, it's the absolute beating Kamala took at the polls.

The concept of, "You voted for this" doesn't just apply to the right, it applies to the left in the context of "You set this stage for the past 4 years, now you get the fruits of your labor."
 
He actually simply claimed that Trump wouldn't do anything about it, not that he caused it... The thing is, the actual president won't matter for this kind of thing - Trump (or Biden, Clinton, Obama, Bush, etc) would be able to do very little to curtail this.

What Trump HAS done is provide an environment where certain people, who would normally do nothing, all of a sudden feel that it's OK to express hate and violence - both for causes supported and not supported by Trump's regime. He has polarized your nation - it will be interesting to see what happens in a decade or so...

No, he did not claim he literally said it was a fact. Either way, I am not about to be baited into another conversations about politics. I said what I said. Most of us just want to read tech news without someone with a moral superiority complex blaming everything that happens on Trump and his 78 million voters.
 
TDS is now running rampant on TechSpot. I am starting to think this site is turning into Reddit.
It's the people who support the Orange Degenerate are the ones suffering from derangement. Go back to Orange Twitter where you belong.

I am not surprised that you think your opinions are facts.
This is hilarious coming from someone who probably lives on a steady diet of Fox News and their brainwashing nonsense. All the clowns on Fox News like Hannity and Laura Inbread do this every single night. They present their opinions as facts. Trump supporters talking about facts and freedom of speech always make me laugh.
 
Last edited:
An overcorrection from a prior administration incapable of objectivity, and the past 4 years of Biden pushing policies that are too far left for the general public. The pendulum is swinging back the other way now, as it always will. If anything's proof of this, it's the absolute beating Kamala took at the polls.

The concept of, "You voted for this" doesn't just apply to the right, it applies to the left in the context of "You set this stage for the past 4 years, now you get the fruits of your labor."
You DO know that Biden’s regime was preceded by Trump’s, right?

The pendulum has been swinging BOTH ways… the impetus was actually Bush’s defeat of Gore way back…. Since then, the nation has been polarizing - at first gradually, but with Trump’s first regime, it seems to have hit the afterburners.

When both parties realize how damaging this has been for the nation, hopefully they will elect more moderate leaders to represent them and sanity might prevail…
 
The concept of, "You voted for this" doesn't just apply to the right, it applies to the left in the context of "You set this stage for the past 4 years, now you get the fruits of your labor."
Sure, whatever you say. Did Republicans get the fruits of their labor 4 years ago when Trump lost? Or did you absolutely refuse to accept the results of the previous election? Funny how that works. You're gloating now, but your side spent the last 4 years whining, and moaning, and refusing to accept the results of that election.

Did Democrats storm the capital after their losses to try and overturn the results of the election? Remind me again which side did that? Let me guess, when your side lost it wasn't a fair election. It's only fair when your side wins, right?
 
Sure, whatever you say. Did Republicans get the fruits of their labor 4 years ago when Trump lost? Or did you absolutely refuse to accept the results of the previous election? Funny how that works. You're gloating now, but your side spent the last 4 years whining, and moaning, and refusing to accept the results of that election.

Did Democrats storm the capital after their losses to try and overturn the results of the election? Remind me again which side did that? Let me guess, when your side lost it wasn't a fair election. It's only fair when your side wins, right?
Your first mistake is assuming that I have a side. Your second is grouping all Republicans into one convenient little box.. a very rudimentary one at that. 🙂

I don't need to pick a side, it's easy enough picking apart terrible logic, misinformation, and assumptions.
 
He actually simply claimed that Trump wouldn't do anything about it, not that he caused it... The thing is, the actual president won't matter for this kind of thing - Trump (or Biden, Clinton, Obama, Bush, etc) would be able to do very little to curtail this.

What Trump HAS done is provide an environment where certain people, who would normally do nothing, all of a sudden feel that it's OK to express hate and violence - both for causes supported and not supported by Trump's regime. He has polarized your nation - it will be interesting to see what happens in a decade or so...
Did Trump cause Just Stop Oil protestors to protest?
 
It's the people who support the Orange Degenerate are the ones suffering from derangement. Go back to Orange Twitter where you belong.


This is hilarious coming from someone who probably lives on a steady diet of Fox News and their brainwashing nonsense. All the clowns on Fox News like Hannity and Laura Inbread do this every single night. They present their opinions as facts. Trump supporters talking about facts and freedom of speech always make me laugh.
As a non-American reading this, I woefully shake my head at the lack of self-awareness in these couple of paragraphs. Just as drunkards insist they're not drunk no matter the level of intoxication, extremists (on both sides, not just the "Orange" side) insist they are not extreme.

66zu1pk.jpeg
 
Eh, the only way out is through. Have to flood the zone with so much AI generated trash that our primate brains will never be able to sort out objective fact from fantasy. If everything is true, nothing is.

OTOH, I suspect Musk and Trump will find the need for some sort of regulatory framework as soon as they become the butt of AI generated deepfakes (found footage from Epstein's island?).
 
Back