Seasonic's upcoming PSUs aim to stop melting GPU power cables

Daniel Sims

Posts: 1,936   +53
Staff
Why it matters: Burning and melting power connectors have plagued Nvidia's enthusiast-class graphics cards for years – even switching to the new, safer cable standard hasn't resolved the issue. Seasonic is devising a solution that won't attack the problem at its source but might help users avoid its worst consequences.

Seasonic showcased a new power supply design at its Computex booth featuring additional safety measures against melting or burning graphics card power cables. As manufacturers release increasingly power-hungry high-end components, monitoring tools and other safeguards might become more prominent.

According to Tom's Hardware, which attended the company's demonstration, Seasonic is designing an external device that allows users to monitor the status of their GPU power cables. The mechanism will enable power distribution tracking while using a GPU and issue warnings when detecting imbalances.

Furthermore, it can alert users and automatically shut down a system if temperatures exceed safety limits to prevent permanent damage. Although such a drastic measure might risk losing users' work and data, it's probably preferable to ruining a graphics card costing thousands of dollars.

The new design is a response to persistent reports of damaged power cables impacting Nvidia's RTX 4090 and 5090 GPUs, which can draw up to 600W. Although the company initially blamed improperly connected power cables, cases haven't ceased despite the adoption of updated 12V-2x6 connectors.

Reports usually describe cables burning at the end connected to the graphics card, but they sometimes also involve melting or burning on the PSU end. Analysis from testers like Der8auer indicates that operating an RTX 5090 can sometimes increase cable temperatures beyond 150°C. Furthermore, power distribution between the wires can become uneven.

While these cases are more common with older 12VHPWR cables used with the RTX 4090, 5090s using 12V-2x6 aren't foolproof, and at least one incident has impacted the 5080. Adapters for connecting newer components to older PSUs are a common but not universal factor.

Seasonic's next-generation Prime-series PSUs featuring the new safety measures are expected to become available in the first quarter of 2026, but pricing remains unclear. While the new design doesn't address the core problem of excessive and unstable power delivery, additional warnings and monitoring tools can still benefit users.

Cableless Back to the Future (BTF) power connections are the most prominent proposed solution. Asus has recently tested prototype motherboards that can supply power directly to compatible GPUs, but whether the format will gain traction remains to be seen.

Permalink to story:

 
I love when a company decides to profit by pretending to address a problem that may or may not even exist in the first place.
 
While I get the idea of having the copper of the motherboard carry the power, I'm not sure I want to pay for what it will cost to add these circuits to motherboards. Also (for the most part), replacing a burned connector or PSU is much cheaper and easier then a new motherboard if something goes south.
 
I love when a company decides to profit by pretending to address a problem that may or may not even exist in the first place.
Or the problem is bigger than we are made to perceive, hence why they came up with this. So since the initial cable launched we were told atx 3.0 was safe, then atx 3.1, and now this design. Maybe they are tired of gpu vendor blaming the psu company. 🤔
 
I love when a company decides to profit by pretending to address a problem that may or may not even exist in the first place.
I'd rather have a power supply that has extensive safety measures built-in even if those safety measures only protect me from my stupidity.

Honestly, I switched to Seasonic years ago because I was tired of crap power supplies that failed. I have not had one Seasonic fail on me, and I have a few that are over 10-years old now.

This kind of protection is something that I would expect from Seasonic. Will I buy one of these, I doubt it, but then again, I have no plans to buy a GPU that needs something that is spec'd to ATX 3.0 or higher.
 
I love when a company decides to profit by pretending to address a problem that may or may not even exist in the first place.
True. Would like to add, the problem is NVIDIAs awful power distribution over connectors. Nothing to do with dodgy PSUs. That validates your comment above, which to be honest hadn't occured to me, but I have to agree.

Finally, I really do like Seasonic PSUs. They have been my "go to," brand for PSUs for the past 6 years. I've never had one fail, and arguably my 850w PSU is just within the boundaries of my PC, considering everything is OCed so much.

i9-9900ks at 5.212GHz. Pulls a lot of wattage in benches.
RTX 3080ti Rog Strix gamer OC. It has a 450w bios max which is above the usual 400w for this card.

With both going full whack, those two components pull a total of over 600w in heavy stability testing which I do a lot of. Add in all the other little bits a pieces, disks Ram etc. Not much extra, but I should have gone 1000w to be on the safe side.

Having said that. My PC is a 2020 or 2021 build, and the 850w has never failed me. I'd say that's not bad.

Next build will likely be Seasonic. But over 1000w depending on components which my list of isn't full yet.
 
"As manufacturers release increasingly power-hungry high-end components" ! STOP, full STOP.

PSU manufacturers should NOT design their tech based on one INCULPATE. I dont see this happening on intel or amd.

Its good that Seasonic (which I always use) will design and create new safety measures, but dont forget, everything added comes at a cost to the consumer !!
 
This is what enthusiast PC gaming comes down to in 2025. Putting a thermal camera in the PC to monitor cable. 🤦‍♀️ 5090 @ 3ghz 450 watt power limit after 2 hours of playing Oblivion remastered. Getting 59 degrees Celsius peak.
 

Attachments

  • Xinf_250523_184642_569.jpg
    Xinf_250523_184642_569.jpg
    639.4 KB · Views: 1
  • Xinf_250523_174224_657.jpg
    Xinf_250523_174224_657.jpg
    890.6 KB · Views: 1
Back