SpaceX goes public in the largest IPO ever, and Musk crosses the trillion-dollar line

Julio Franco

Posts: 9,317   +2,250
Staff member
Why it matters: The largest IPO in history did two things at once: it made Elon Musk the world's first trillionaire, and it quietly converted a privately held rocket company into a stock that millions of investors may soon own whether they chose to or not. SpaceX isn't asking Wall Street to price its launches or its satellites. It's asking the market to bet that a rocket company is on its way to becoming one of the most valuable AI companies on Earth, and to start paying for that future today.

SpaceX began trading on the Nasdaq on Friday under the ticker SPCX, and the numbers attached to the debut are the kind that usually require a footnote to believe. The company priced 555.6 million Class A shares at $135 on Thursday evening, raising roughly $75 billion and valuing the firm at about $1.77 trillion before a single share changed hands. That makes it the biggest initial public offering in history, nearly triple Saudi Aramco's $29 billion listing in 2019, the record it displaced.

The stock did what hotly anticipated debuts tend to do. It opened around $150, about 11% above the offer price, then swung as high as the $168 to $175 range in the first minutes of live trading before settling near $158 to $165 by midday. At those levels SpaceX briefly carried a market capitalization north of $2 trillion, placing it among the most valuable public companies in the world on day one.

But not to be surprised, the headline most news outlets led with was personal rather than corporate. Elon Musk, who holds an estimated 42% of SpaceX and acts as chairman, chief executive, and controlling shareholder, became the world's first trillionaire, at least on paper. That wealth is tied up in stock and options across SpaceX and Tesla.

Musk rang the opening bell from SpaceX's headquarters in Starbase, Texas alongside hundreds of employees, while president Gwynne Shotwell and CFO Bret Johnsen handled the ceremony in New York. "Take the fiction out of science fiction," Musk said before the session opened, restating the Mars ambitions that have always been part of the pitch.

The AI story is doing a lot of the work

Strip away the spectacle and the SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation rests on a forecast, not a balance sheet. SpaceX reported a net loss of $4.9 billion in 2025 on revenue of about $18.6 billion, so investors are not paying $1.77 trillion for current profits. They are paying for what the company says comes next.

Credit: App Economy Insights

The filing makes that explicit. SpaceX estimates a total addressable market of $28.5 trillion, with roughly $26.5 trillion of it attributed to AI, a category the company entered in earnest after absorbing Musk's xAI earlier this year. Beyond Starship and Starlink, the SEC documents describe plans for terrestrial data centers, custom AI microchips, and what SpaceX calls orbital AI compute infrastructure.

In other words, the rocket company is asking the market to value it largely as an AI company, which is why the offering is being read as the first in an expected wave that includes OpenAI and Anthropic.

For retail investors, that framing is the appeal. SpaceX targeted about 30% retail participation, well above the 10% typical of a large IPO, and the listing offers one of the few direct routes into a major AI player outside Meta, Microsoft, and Alphabet. Fidelity reported more than 500,000 buy orders within the first hour.

But not everyone is buying the story

The skeptics are loud, and they are not all anonymous. Morningstar this week pegged SpaceX's fair value at roughly $63 a share, less than half the IPO price, calling the offering overvalued. That is a striking gap for a name generating this much demand.

The sharper critique concerns who ends up holding the stock. Several index providers, including Nasdaq and FTSE Russell, recently adopted fast-entry rules that could add SpaceX to major indexes well inside the year that benchmarks have historically required after an IPO. Because index funds must mirror their benchmarks, inclusion forces automatic buying, which means millions of savers could gain exposure to an unprofitable company without ever choosing the stock. S&P Dow Jones declined to bend its rules, so the S&P 500 will wait, but the broader point stands.

Economist Paul Krugman put it most bluntly, describing Musk as a "human Ponzi scheme" and arguing that the rule changes effectively conscript ordinary investors into propping up a valuation built on belief rather than fundamentals. He notes that index and index-based funds now hold roughly 52% of mutual fund assets, which is how a debut like this reaches people who never opted in.

That is the tension worth watching. SpaceX has a real and rare asset in Starlink, a launch business with no genuine competitor, and an engineering record that few firms can match.

Whether any of that justifies a two-trillion-dollar valuation, or whether the AI pivot is doing more lifting than the engineering, is a question the next few quarters will start to answer. For now, the most-watched stock chart in the market belongs to a company that is selling tomorrow harder than it is selling today.

Permalink to story:

 
The instant adoption into indexes is a gross abuse of the system (that already favors the rich).

The entire purpose of choosing an index fund is to be in established, representative companies and avoid high risk stocks (and have a low broker tax) which is why there were rules in the first place.
This makes S and P 500 a probably one of the top indexes because they rejected Space x until 1 year has passed and 4 quarters of profitability. What happeneds to the prices of the shares when they dump the rest of the 70 to 80% of the shares on the market?
 
Last edited:
The biggest scam in history.


I agree.

SpaceX is Musk's distraction from Tesla which is a piddling "D-rating" in my portfolio and can't manage to go anywhere while the competition edges closer and closer.

When the dust settles, Musk will have his trillion dollar crown and everyone will be left holding the bag and waiting to finally get their Tesla Roadster.
 
I can't think of any man less suitable to be that wealthy. A true horror of a human being. Everything you hear about his dealings with colleagues and especially women and children makes your skin crawl. His favourite activity in his spare time is trying stir up far right hatred around the world. A true sociopathic narcissist in the purest sense of the phrase. Even his pitiful attempts at philanthropy are just self-serving.

He's so unpleasant, he's like a comic-book bad guy. I'd put him right up in the top ten of modern day human-horror-shows along with the likes of Zuckerberg, Trump, Bezos, Putin, Infantino and Xi. Can you imagine how much better off the planet would be if these deranged maniacs weren't always pushing tiny-little egos up hills and tilting at their imaginary windmills?
 
Last edited:
This stock is ripe to short at 170. I thing it will dive well under the initial 135 just as the craze fades.
 
I agree.

SpaceX is Musk's distraction from Tesla which is a piddling "D-rating" in my portfolio and can't manage to go anywhere while the competition edges closer and closer.

When the dust settles, Musk will have his trillion dollar crown and everyone will be left holding the bag and waiting to finally get their Tesla Roadster.
Tesla is so over valued. Yet to see what truly gives it's value yet. In Europe China is taking over with the likes of BYD and from speaking to folks who've had Tesla and BYD, they prefer the BYD.
 
I wonder why genuinely compassionate people never seem to amass such weath? Everyone at the top seems to have either a curse written directly into their personality or eating then alive from the inside. Is amassing wealth an act of agression in and of itself beyond a certain point?
 
I wonder why genuinely compassionate people never seem to amass such weath? Everyone at the top seems to have either a curse written directly into their personality or eating then alive from the inside. Is amassing wealth an act of agression in and of itself beyond a certain point?
I believe that money is a magical powerful substance that can control people, both--bodies and minds. As a result, I find it only logical when a billionaire is occupied with pushing to become a trillionaire rather than changing the world for better. When someone becomes a master of you, you do what he tells you to do.

And it might be just me, but I feel like there would not be so many people asking how this is right or fair if there was not an increasing distance between them and the majority of the rest of us who can barely afford the very basic necessities. It is not right for someone to have so much when there are so many of us who are willing to work and contribute to society but even that becomes harder and harder.

For this reason alone, I believe that visas for foreign workers must be strictly limited, allowing only the most gifted and educated to work here. They are the wealthiest in our country, and yet they keep stealing from us. That is what is so wrong, not just the mere fact that they accumulated so much wealth. Ordering an Indian to do an entry level job is a theft; the worst because it is no different than the richest stealing from poorest. This is just my opinion, but I think for this reason there is a growing contempt and animosity for people like Musk. They should do good when they have so much power to do so. And if they do not want to, then they should pay for someone else to do using their money.
 
Never cared for Musk or Tesla one way or the other. Never wanted/needed an EV, but if that's what you want, go for it.
What is really funny to watch over the years is how Musk was the darling per se, of the environmentalist types that wanted to ban ICE vehicles and force everyone onto EV's...UNTIL! He sided up with Trump and then all of a sudden he's the worst person that ever came out of a womb!
 
I wish we also had a DISLIKE comment option here.
I'm OK-ish with stupid BS but sometimes I find comments absolutely revolting and I would totally reward the poster with a DISLIKE if I could.
In some places a big number of downvotes/dislikes will render extra-unpopular comments invisible. I sort of appreciate that.

However, I own nor control this website and when I'm fed up I'll just leave and delete the bookmark. Done that before. All websites with comment sections have their ups and downs due to the number and type of commenters at any given date. And mind you, policing websites is hard.
 
But my rectum has not been expanded to those specifications before! We are in uncharted territory
 
Lets see where its at next week. Or better yet, in the next correction or bear market. These fantastical stocks/companies go down HARD.
It’s locked into years of losses with AI investment and there seems to be a significant amount of people shorting it. I wouldn’t be surprised if it halves in value by the end of the year.
 
I wonder why genuinely compassionate people never seem to amass such weath? Everyone at the top seems to have either a curse written directly into their personality or eating then alive from the inside. Is amassing wealth an act of agression in and of itself beyond a certain point?
Genuinely compassionate people understand spreading wealth throughout society is far more valuable, and improves the lives of a lot more people, vs hoarding wealth into a very concentrated few.

To get that rich, you truly cannot care for others, you have to be slightly broken, or at least, I don’t understand how any sane person can justify holding so much wealth to such extremes.
 
So many losers freaking out over the guy who basically pioneered half of the planet's EV charging infrastructure (when everybody was busy sitting on their hands saying it was impossible), bringing last-mile internet to a world that was being underserved by the established ISPs (what, do y'all love Comcast now that Starlink is here), and 10-100x'ing NASA's own space exploration capability (what, y'all hate NASA now?). Face it, without Musk, we're basically still in the 2000's. Seriously.

Because Musk realized, like any genuine Westerner, or person with more than a room-temp IQ, that White people actually aren't the devil (not even close) and deserve to feel at home IN THEIR OWN COUNTRIES, y'all are now cutting off your own noses to spite your own faces. It's honestly hilarious to see. If only the West never abandoned imperialism...
 
Back