SpaceX quietly files for massive IPO that could value the company at over $1.75 trillion

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
What just happened? Elon Musk's SpaceX is preparing to test whether public markets are ready to treat a private space and AI conglomerate like a megacap tech platform. The company has submitted a confidential registration for an initial public offering, positioning SpaceX for a possible June debut and what could be the largest stock sale on record.

The people, who asked not to be identified because the details are private, said SpaceX could seek a valuation above $1.75 trillion, eclipsing Saudi Aramco's 2019 IPO as the biggest to date.

The filing follows SpaceX's acquisition of Musk's artificial intelligence startup xAI in a transaction that valued the combined business at about $1.25 trillion. Through that deal, the rocket, satellite and AI group now also encompasses X. The result is an entity that spans orbital launch, broadband infrastructure, social media, and generative AI, giving investors a rare way to buy exposure across several of the most capital-intensive arenas in tech.

People familiar with the plans told Bloomberg the offering could raise as much as $75 billion, a scale that would dwarf every prior IPO and, in the view of some existing shareholders, "easily" set a new record. Gene Munster, managing partner at SpaceX investor Deepwater Asset Management, told The Washington Post the deal could bring in more than $80 billion. He said "the narrative around space is that it's early and they've got the pole position," adding, "I could see it go vertical right out of the gate."

Behind the scenes, SpaceX is assembling an unusually broad banking syndicate and preparing a global retail push. A person familiar with the deal told Bloomberg that the company is considering allocating as much as 30% of the offering to individual investors and may adopt a dual-class share structure that would give insiders such as Musk enhanced voting power.

Munster said that SpaceX's mix of businesses – from satellite internet and data centers to exploration missions – is likely to appeal to both institutions and retail traders drawn to high-growth stories. Shay Boloor, chief market strategist at Futurum, told The Washington Post that SpaceX had grown too large to remain private and is now a peer of tech giants like Google, Amazon and Microsoft. "Being able to participate in the leader of the space economy, and an Elon company combined with that, generates an unknown multiple," he said.

The IPO also lands at a moment when Musk's ambitions for the company are shifting but remain expansive. SpaceX, founded in 2002, is already the dominant commercial launch provider through its Falcon 9 rocket and leads the low-Earth-orbit broadband market via its Starlink constellation, which together are expected to generate close to $20 billion in revenue in 2026, with xAI contributing under $1 billion.

SpaceX boasts that its next-generation Starship vehicle is intended "to carry both crew and cargo to Earth orbit, the Moon, Mars and beyond" and is "the world's most powerful launch vehicle ever developed."

Yet Musk has recently recalibrated timelines for deep-space milestones. After tensions with Transportation Secretary and acting NASA administrator Sean P. Duffy over the pace of progress on a crewed lunar mission, Musk said this year that SpaceX would prioritize building a large-scale presence on the Moon before fully pivoting to Mars.

"For those unaware, SpaceX has already shifted focus to building a self-growing city on the Moon, as we can potentially achieve that in less than 10 years, whereas Mars would take 20+ years," he said in a post on X. "SpaceX will also strive to build a Mars city and begin doing so in about 5 to 7 years, but the overriding priority is securing the future of civilization and the Moon is faster."

For public-market investors, the offering would provide a liquid way to bet on that roadmap and on Musk himself. The stock sale is expected to further lift the net worth of Musk, already the world's richest person, only months after Tesla's board granted him a potential $1 trillion pay package tied to long-term performance targets.

Permalink to story:

 
If he has not kept promises it is on you to list them. I'm all open eyes and ears.

LOL. Elon has claimed Full Self Driving will happen in a year on his Teslas so many times, it's been a meme for a decade now. Here is but a single example:

"02.07.2018 Tesla will take a self-driving car across the US in autonomous mode during the first half of 2018, CEO Elon Musk said during the company's fourth-quarter earnings call on Wednesday."
 
LOL. Elon has claimed Full Self Driving will happen in a year on his Teslas so many times, it's been a meme for a decade now. Here is but a single example:

"02.07.2018 Tesla will take a self-driving car across the US in autonomous mode during the first half of 2018, CEO Elon Musk said during the company's fourth-quarter earnings call on Wednesday."
And then there's this https://www.futura-sciences.com/en/...s-by-2026-but-is-starship-really-ready_23574/
“Starship is going to Mars at the end of 2026.” That bold statement came from Musk less than a year ago, promising a voyage to the Red Planet aboard his reusable heavy rocket. Even then, many industry experts reacted with skepticism — and time hasn’t proven them wrong.
And now, from this TechSpot article, no less, he's saying it will take 20+years. Saying something is going to take 20+ years in the world of science typically means "I have no f'ing clue when its going to happen if it ever does."

Some just don't want to believe anything other than what they hear. The Apollo program originally targeted 1968 for a manned moon landing and it ended up being 1969.

I'm sure there's other examples out there of fElon talking out his rear that have no need to be left as an exercise to find by the unbelievers.

But here's another article with the fElon quote published at the time fElon said it - https://www.reuters.com/business/ae...ncrewed-starship-mars-by-end-2026-2025-05-30/
 
Last edited:
And now, from this TechSpot article, no less, he's saying it will take 20+years. Saying something is going to take 20+ years in the world of science typically means "I have no f'ing clue when its going to happen if it ever does."
You misread the article. He said it would take that long for a self-sustaining city on Mars to exist, not to arrive on Mars. But I do agree any 20 year timeline is basically a shot in the dark lol. I don’t think anyone takes them seriously, except people who think climate change will end the world.
 
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Just in case you don't realize it, SpaceX has royalty-free access to NASA's entire library of IP. Without NASA, SpaceX would be nothing more than fElon's wet dream.
Anyone familiar with the engineering of the Falcon series.knows what total bs this is. And thanks to the Space Act Agreement a lot of other companies have the same access. None of them were able to do what SoaceX has
 
Anyone familiar with the engineering of the Falcon series.knows what total bs this is. And thanks to the Space Act Agreement a lot of other companies have the same access. None of them were able to do what SoaceX has
Except for Blue Origin.

And BTW, NASA has just proven it is still way more than relevant.
 
You misread the article. He said it would take that long for a self-sustaining city on Mars to exist, not to arrive on Mars. But I do agree any 20 year timeline is basically a shot in the dark lol. I don’t think anyone takes them seriously, except people who think climate change will end the world.
So does that mean the fElon thinks Climate Change will end the world? If I'm not mistaken, fElon was right up there with Stephen Hawking in thinking that humanity needs to leave the Earth because the Earth is doomed. https://futurism.com/elon-musk-we-must-leave-earth-for-one-critical-reason
At the Wall Street Journal’s D: All Things Digital Conference in 2013, Musk explained his feelings, stating, “Either we spread Earth to other planets, or we risk going extinct. An extinction event is inevitable and we’re increasingly doing ourselves in. The goal is to improve rocket technology and space technology until we can send people to Mars and establish life on Mars.”
 
So does that mean the fElon thinks Climate Change will end the world? If I'm not mistaken, fElon was right up there with Stephen Hawking in thinking that humanity needs to leave the Earth because the Earth is doomed. https://futurism.com/elon-musk-we-must-leave-earth-for-one-critical-reason
No he doesn't think that, and calls those people climate change alarmists:
He is referring to multiple historical extinction events that may happen again one day, and that's why he says he wants to make humanity "multi" planetary (not leaving Earth lol). If Elon Musk thought the world was doomed, why would he make a company that provides and uses sustainable energy for Earth?

Anyways, he's not a religious person, and much of his worldview seems to be shaped by science fiction and avoiding bad outcomes. Every company from the last 25 years he's founded/got involved with for some issue in mind. Tesla was to address climate change, SpaceX was to create a backup plan for humanity, The Boring Company was to help deal with traffic, OpenAI was founded to prevent advanced AI from being under the control of a bad actor, Neuralink was to put humans on-par with AI systems, and Twitter he bought to restore free speech and because he liked it so much.
 
And then there's this https://www.futura-sciences.com/en/...s-by-2026-but-is-starship-really-ready_23574/

And now, from this TechSpot article, no less, he's saying it will take 20+years. Saying something is going to take 20+ years in the world of science typically means "I have no f'ing clue when its going to happen if it ever does."

Some just don't want to believe anything other than what they hear. The Apollo program originally targeted 1968 for a manned moon landing and it ended up being 1969.

I'm sure there's other examples out there of fElon talking out his rear that have no need to be left as an exercise to find by the unbelievers.

But here's another article with the fElon quote published at the time fElon said it - https://www.reuters.com/business/ae...ncrewed-starship-mars-by-end-2026-2025-05-30/
Clearly you didn't read that last article.
"Musk gave his company a 50-50 chance of meeting that deadline. If Starship were not ready by that time, SpaceX would wait another two years before trying again, Musk suggested in the video."
 
And perhaps you, and others with a similar opinion, should read this - https://www.planetary.org/articles/nasa-versus-spacex
You don't read links before posting them, do you? Nothing in that article supports the absurd belief that SpaceX rocket were based on NASA IP. Do you see NASA flying any methane-fueled, fully-reusable rockets that land by balancing on their tails? Falcon and Starship both were clean ground-up new designs.

SpaceX got early revenues from NASA -- but it did so by selling launch services to them, and at a rate far below what NASA itself could provide them at. And in fact, the article goes to great lengths to explain why we need both NASA and SpaceX.

"..Without SpaceX, the only U.S. company currently capable of carrying cargo to the ISS would currently be Northrop Grumman, and NASA would still be reliant on the Russian Soyuz for crew transportation....."
 
Last edited:
Back