Spotify rolls out hateful content and conduct policy

Shawn Knight

Posts: 12,401   +121
Staff member

Spotify on Thursday enacted a new policy against hateful content and conduct, reserving the right to remove such content from its platform or at the very least, refrain from actively promoting it.

One of the first artists to be impacted by this new policy is R. Kelly.

In a statement provided to BuzzFeed, the streaming music giant said they are removing R. Kelly’s music from all Spotify owned and operated playlists and algorithmic recommendation such as Discover Weekly. A source close to Spotify tells the publication that rapper XXXTentacion has also been removed from playlists and will no longer be promoted.

Spotify in announcing the new policy said it thought long and hard about how to handle content that is not hate content itself but comes from artists or creators who have demonstrated hateful conduct personally.

While we don’t believe in censoring content because of an artist’s or creator’s behavior, we want our editorial decisions - what we choose to program - to reflect our values. So, in some circumstances, when an artist or creator does something that is especially harmful or hateful (for example, violence against children and sexual violence), it may affect the ways we work with or support that artist or creator.

Spotify concedes that cultural standards and sensitivities vary widely. There will always be content that is acceptable to some and offensive to others, the platform says, adding that they will always look at the entire context when determining if content violates its new policy.

Spotify has partnered with several rights advocacy groups to help them identify hate content including Showing Up for Racial Justice (SURJ), the Southern Poverty Law Center, the International Network Against Cyber Hate, the Anti-Defamation League, Color Of Change, GLAAD and Muslim Advocates.

The streaming giant also built an internal content monitoring system called Spotify AudioWatch that identifies content that has been flagged as being hateful and encourages users to reach out if they hear hate content.

R. Kelly image via Getty Images

Permalink to story.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
D

davislane1

Cancelled my Spotify sub some time ago because I wasn’t using it. Will never use the service again after this.

R Kelly may or may not be a bad guy and I don’t listen to his music, but attempting to control the thoughts and minds of people by economically punishing them for running afoul of your “values” off platform is unacceptable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gibbstar

Teko03

Posts: 613   +327
This is quite ridiculous. Spotify has no reason to concern them selves with a musicians behavior out side of a recording booth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gibbstar

ShagnWagn

Posts: 1,297   +1,081
"While we don’t believe in censoring content because of an artist’s or creator’s behavior, we want our editorial decisions"

Yeah, this is no joke. They could absolutely care less about any of its millions of subscribers about blocking out explicit or blaspheming content (all unnecessary to make a song). They force me to listen to that crap if I want to use their service.

It will take a very minor amount of effort to add a single column to their music database "explicit" for each song and give us a single checkbox to not list those. Unbelievable! Heck, don't even flag songs as explicit - at minimum gives us the ability to block songs if they must make us listen to them.

Even if I specify Christian music when I desire to listen to it, they still throw in rap and explicit non-Christian songs in my playlist. Their evil ways...

If pandora was even a descent service, I would use them instead. They give the ability to block explicit content, although they don't screen songs very well, and they could care less about blasphemy (which is using God's name as a curse word).
 
D

davislane1

"While we don’t believe in censoring content because of an artist’s or creator’s behavior, we want our editorial decisions"

Yeah, this is no joke. They could absolutely care less about any of its millions of subscribers about blocking out explicit or blaspheming content (all unnecessary to make a song). They force me to listen to that crap if I want to use their service.

It will take a very minor amount of effort to add a single column to their music database "explicit" for each song and give us a single checkbox to not list those. Unbelievable! Heck, don't even flag songs as explicit - at minimum gives us the ability to block songs if they must make us listen to them.

Even if I specify Christian music when I desire to listen to it, they still throw in rap and explicit non-Christian songs in my playlist. Their evil ways...

If pandora was even a descent service, I would use them instead. They give the ability to block explicit content, although they don't screen songs very well, and they could care less about blasphemy (which is using God's name as a curse word).
Guarantee you they strike down anything that runs astray of Islam's rules on blasphemy.