Steam Machine benchmarks show single RAM stick setup can cost up to 20% performance

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,987   +58
Staff
Bottom line: Valve's decision to ship its latest Steam Machine with a single memory module is drawing closer scrutiny as early testing suggests that choice costs the system some performance. Benchmarks show that simply populating the second slot to enable dual-channel memory can deliver measurable gains in both compression workloads and several modern games.

Each retail unit ships with a single 16GB DDR5-5600 SO-DIMM, a configuration Valve links to tight DDR5 supply. That single stick forces the Steam Machine into single-channel mode out of the box, instead of tapping the extra bandwidth dual-channel offers.

Gamers Nexus benchmarked both configurations to see how much that choice affects performance. In side-by-side tests of the stock single-stick and a dual-stick setup, the outlet saw performance gains that depended heavily on the workload and peaked around 20%.

The contrast shows up most clearly in CPU-heavy tasks. In 7-Zip compression, two sticks were about 19% faster than one, a result that lines up with the extra bandwidth dual-channel provides. Decompression results were effectively identical, underscoring that not every workload leans on memory throughput.

In games, the picture is mixed as well, with some titles gaining a lot and others barely moving. In Baldur's Gate 3, the system averaged 69.4 frames per second with two sticks installed, compared to 60.2 FPS in the default configuration, a 15% increase. Resident Evil 4 showed a 10% bump, reaching 129.9 FPS versus 118.1 FPS. The Outer Worlds 2 posted a 14% gain, while Starfield saw a more modest 3% improvement.

Other games, including Black Myth: Wukong, Stellaris, and Final Fantasy XIV, showed little to no meaningful difference between the two setups. The tests suggest those titles are less sensitive to memory bandwidth, at least in the scenarios Gamers Nexus used.

The findings run counter to earlier comments from Valve, which had indicated that the performance difference between single- and dual-channel configurations would be negligible. The benchmarks show that claim doesn't hold up in every case, especially in tests that lean on system memory.

Valve has also clarified that all units currently shipping include the single 16GB module. Earlier guidance suggested buyers might receive either a 2x8GB or 1x16GB configuration, but that is no longer the case. As shipped, that leaves every unit running in single-channel mode until a second module is added.

The outcome isn't surprising. Running two sticks in dual-channel mode doubles the memory bus width, which can help in workloads that push a lot of data through RAM. Even with the higher speeds offered by DDR5, the difference between one and two channels remains relevant.

For most buyers, the stock setup will still feel fast enough, and the biggest gaps show up only in specific tests and games. Owners who care about squeezing out extra performance can add a second matching SO-DIMM to enable dual-channel, which pays off most in bandwidth-heavy workloads.

Permalink to story:

 
I know people complain about mis-matching sticks of RAM and some claim instability. It's been my experience that if you match the timings to the slower stick of RAM these issues go away. Many motherboards even do this automatically these days without the user even realizing it.

While nothing about the steam machine is ideal, especially with the ram crisis, I actually am kind of happy for the 1X16gb setup. I don't think I'll be getting an SM any time soon at the new price, but I like being able to upgrade to 32gigs in the future and if it was 2X8GB, that would be a lot more expensive in the current market.

I feel the pros outweight the cons in this case because I feel most people who buy this will 1)be technically inclined and 2)want to upgrade to 32GB of ram at some point. 16GB is "fine" for now, but "fine" is not "good".

Frankly, the main reason I'm still on my 12th gen Intel laptop is that any modern laptop with a decent GPU in it has soldered on LPDDR5. I travel a lot for work and I use my laptop for a lot more than gaming in hotel rooms. If I could get a modern laptop with a good APU with 60 class graphics and upgradable memory, I would have no problem buying one with 16gigs of ram in it and upgrading later. But looking already spending top teir money for an APU with 60 class perforce then adding another $1000 to the price tag just so I can get 64gigs of soldered on memory is too much to swallow. I have 64gig on my 12800h laptop and that will have to do for now. A decent laptop with a 60class APU and 64GB of ram costs more than a 5090 right now, screw that
 
Last edited:
Not a surprise memory speed and bandwidth very important for an APU.

The next question will be how much more performance will you get when you move to memory faster than DDR5-5600.
 
It's not an apu. It's a CPU with a dgpu.

Does not change the fact that you can't replace them - non-upgradable at the chip level - so it basicly functions like a regular APU in that sense. They probably did what they did, to get price even lower.

You can change/upgrade RAM and storage but CPU/GPU and even VRAM is soldered.

So much for being "just a PC"
 
Last edited:
Does not change the fact that you can't replace them - non-upgradable at the chip level - so it basicly functions like a regular APU in that sense. They probably did what they did, to get price even lower.

You can change/upgrade RAM and storage but CPU/GPU and even VRAM is soldered.

So much for being "just a PC"
It's a lot like a laptop. I imagine they did what they did to make it easier to support on their end. They don't need to support other GPUs attached to their hardware if they don't intend for users to swap GPUs. Being unable to change their CPU or GPU significantly simplifies things by reducing their focus to just the components that it ships with. It's a smart move and one that helps to avoid bad press associated with what owners are doing with their hardware.
 
Of course you can get faster than 5600 sodimms.

There are plenty of 6000, or 6400 ram skus.
They are rated faster, but outside of very specific SKUs from laptop manufacturers, they aren't supported. Especially now that LPDDR5 is a thing. If you want faster than 5600 sodimms, you just use LPDDR
 
Back