It doesn't "lose" the rest though?! Unless you're blind and cannot read simple graphs? It's £350 cheaper yet (currently) according to leaked graphs it CAN keep up with a card that hits quadrople figures ($1000) in price, I'd call that a win from AMD there..
That chart is compared to the 980Ti.... NOT the TitanX... The TitanX beats this card - And I'm not arguing about whether the card to buy is the Fury or the Titan (we won't know until real benchmarks appear anyways!), I'm simply saying that AMD can't claim the performance crown...
The Ti is the better value over the Titan - the Fury will almost certainly be a better value than the Titan as well... possibly even better than the Ti - we'll see once it's released...
But if money is no object - the TitanX is the card to buy... barring unforseen results in REAL benchmarks - but I don't think the Fury will be beating the TitanX in any but a few select games - we'll see in a few days...
Again you are incorrect it does outperform the Titan X, however the Titan X can run 8k now, and only at above the 5k mark does the Titan x outperform the Fury X. This is really simple simple math to understand.
It is like a giant ford 460 BB with a 850 CC carb that has crazy high 500HP and torque, but gets its nearly 10liter *** destroyed by a 2.2 liter Subaru WRX. Whoever moves the resources faster wins.