Tesla shareholders approve $1 trillion pay package for Elon Musk

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 1,998   +58
Staff
The big picture: For Tesla shareholders, the vote represents both a consolidation of Musk's authority and a long-term bet on his ability to sustain dramatic growth across markets – from electric vehicles to autonomous systems and humanoid robotics – over the next decade. It also underscores how closely investors continue to tie Tesla's valuation to Musk's leadership, even as questions about governance, execution risk, and market saturation become increasingly pronounced.

Tesla shareholders have approved a compensation package worth nearly $1 trillion for CEO Elon Musk. Results announced Thursday at the annual shareholder meeting in Austin, Texas, showed that roughly 75 percent of voting shares supported the plan, which ties Musk's pay to ambitious long-term stock and operational milestones.

The new package, introduced by Tesla's board in September, outlines 12 tranches of stock grants that could increase Musk's ownership stake from approximately 13 percent to 25 percent if the company meets a series of performance thresholds. Each tranche is linked to specific market capitalization levels and operational goals extending into the 2030s.

Under the plan, the first tranche will vest if Tesla reaches a market capitalization of $2 trillion, up from its current $1.54 trillion. Subsequent awards are triggered by $500 billion increments in valuation, culminating in a full payout if Tesla achieves an $8.5 trillion market cap. The final two tranches would only unlock through larger, trillion-dollar jumps, representing some of the most aggressive growth targets in corporate compensation history.

Alongside market benchmarks, the package includes profitability milestones starting at $50 billion in annual adjusted profit and rising to $400 billion. In the third quarter, Tesla posted $4.2 billion in adjusted EBITDA, highlighting the gap between current results and these ambitious targets.

The company must also achieve several aggressive production and technology milestones, including delivering 20 million electric vehicles, reaching 10 million active full self-driving subscriptions, deploying 1 million Optimus humanoid robots, and placing 1 million robotaxis into commercial operation.

Tesla's September proxy filing noted that the plan does not clarify whether FSD subscriptions must be paid for by customers or if free trials are included. Currently, the company markets a system called "FSD Supervised," a partially automated driver-assistance platform in development toward full autonomy. Tesla says its next-generation system is being designed to eliminate the need for in-car human supervision.

During the meeting, Musk highlighted the company's long-term robotics ambitions, describing the Optimus humanoid platform as potentially transformative. He predicted that the technology could surpass smartphones in market significance and play roles in healthcare, manufacturing, and even law enforcement. No production timeline or commercial release target was provided.

The shareholder session also addressed a separate investor proposal led by Stephen Hawk that would allow Tesla to invest directly in Musk's artificial intelligence company, xAI, which he founded in 2023. Brandon Ehrhart, Tesla's general counsel, said the motion received more votes in favor than against, but with a large number of abstentions, Tesla is still considering next steps.

The approval of the pay package follows last year's Delaware Court of Chancery ruling that Musk's 2018 compensation plan was improperly awarded and should be rescinded. Musk has appealed, and the case is now before the Delaware Supreme Court. The adoption of the new plan adds another layer of complexity to Tesla's legal and governance landscape.

Both major proxy advisory firms, Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services, had recommended that investors oppose the package, citing its size and structure. Supporters on the Tesla board argued that retaining Musk as CEO is essential to maintaining the company's pace of innovation in electric vehicles, energy storage, and artificial intelligence.

Musk continues to juggle leadership roles at multiple companies, including SpaceX, Neuralink, The Boring Company, xAI, and the platform X, which absorbed parts of his earlier ventures. Meanwhile, his political involvement has drawn attention beyond the tech and automotive sectors.

The National Bureau of Economic Research recently estimated that Tesla's US sales between October 2022 and April 2025 may have been 67 percent to 83 percent higher had Musk not engaged in partisan activity.

Despite the controversy, Tesla's newly approved agreement neither restricts Musk's political activities nor requires him to dedicate a minimum amount of time to Tesla operations. The compensation plan also lists a series of "covered events" – including natural disasters, wars, pandemics, or regulatory changes – that could trigger specific stock awards even if operational goals remain unmet.

According to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Musk could still realize more than $50 billion in gains by achieving portions of the outlined milestones, even without fulfilling all performance conditions.

Permalink to story:

 
Ironically Glass Lewis admits that Delaware's judge overruling Tesla shareholder's approved executive compensation for Elon Musk is driving companies to leave the state: https://www.glasslewis.com/article/state-of-us-reincorporation-2025-growing-threat-reality-dexit

One of the main reasons is that companies incorporated in Delaware have been subject to their shareholders losing rights and frivolous lawsuits that benefit those suing the companies. One lower court judge even stopped TripAdvisor from leaving Delaware, effectively holding TripAdvisor hostage until its supreme court overruled it. It's a small number of companies, but a recent trend that is slowly being rectified.
 
Given how controversial Musk is as a supporter of fascism and Nazism, it seems crazy that the Tesla board would want to pay out 1 trillion rather than just replace Musk.
Your basic premise is highly disputable. You should at least cite unbiased sources if you're going to continue to make outlandish claims like that. The logic needed to make that claim is the same logic as claiming that Chick-fil-a is a supporter of genocide in Africa.
It's sad that trillion dollars won't be used for anything good.
You clearly didn't read the article.
 
I have the feeling something is a bit of. Capitalism going too far... And still, there are people applauding for this.

Also funny: I just read an article that Tesla sales in Europe go down really hard.
 
Your basic premise is highly disputable. You should at least cite unbiased sources if you're going to continue to make outlandish claims like that. The logic needed to make that claim is the same logic as claiming that Chick-fil-a is a supporter of genocide in Africa.

You clearly didn't read the article.

If doing two sieg hails on live tv won’t convince you then you are beyond lost.
 
Only a complete id1ot would vote against Musk.
If he decides to abandon Tesla, it would immediately lose 50%+ of its cap. If the loony activists manage to capture it, Tesla will not survive more than an year.
 
Tesla is baked as a brand for so many reasons.
Poor quality cars with terrible recall rates. Can't compete with all the other EV makers now. A brand reputation in tatters following Musks very public deranged ultra far-right behaviour making them a complete no-no for huge parts of the world (including the 50% of the US that haven't lost their collective minds). This share offering smacks of desperation from the board.
 
Tesla is baked as a brand for so many reasons.
Poor quality cars with terrible recall rates. Can't compete with all the other EV makers now. A brand reputation in tatters following Musks very public deranged ultra far-right behaviour making them a complete no-no for huge parts of the world (including the 50% of the US that haven't lost their collective minds). This share offering smacks of desperation from the board.
That's a short summary of your wet dreams, but investors obviously think otherwise.
 
Tesla board doesn't burden itself with morality. They only understand money.

I would think Tesla would do better with sales without him so that's why it seems crazy to me, or even if they did a little bit worse, I doubt they will do a trillion dollars worse. Tesla has a net worth of ~1.5T right now so a 1T pay out is huge. Even if it were Nvidia, it would be obscene. I just don't see him being worth 1T.

Only a complete id1ot would vote against Musk.
If he decides to abandon Tesla, it would immediately lose 50%+ of its cap. If the loony activists manage to capture it, Tesla will not survive more than an year.

Magas always phrase things as if the only options are two extremes. There is a lot of room on the spectrum between Nazi and loony activist. Just a normal guy who doesn't do Nazi salutes but isn't particularly political either would be ideal. Even if you yourself are a Nazi and you love Musk so much you want to kiss him, on an investment level you have to wonder how much better Tesla or any company would do without a Nazi that literally makes people swear to never buy their products at the helm.


I really don't understand what Tesla needs from Musk at this point. They have an established business, I don't understand why they couldn't just carry on as normal without him. At one time he was a Steve Jobs level salesman, but that ship has sailed.
 
Your basic premise is highly disputable. You should at least cite unbiased sources if you're going to continue to make outlandish claims like that. The logic needed to make that claim is the same logic as claiming that Chick-fil-a is a supporter of genocide in Africa.
I would just hit Ignore on him. He's chronically politically toxic, and not worth seeing in your feed (what you replied to looks like the usual BS). I've just accepted that there's no reasoning with someone so hateful online that they ignore facts, can't be wrong, and see everything as political. And considering this is (should be) a tech website, no skin off my back.


Otherwise, seems like the majority of shareholders like how good their Tesla stocks are doing under him. Why would they care to change that at this time?
Like him or not, the only people I've seen whining about it are outsiders who want him to fail. They don't actually give a good reason why or a better solution.
 
If doing two sieg hails on live tv won’t convince you then you are beyond lost.
Again I ask for an unbiased source supporting this. The ADL said while it bore an awkward semblance to a nazi salute, the gestures expressed emotional connection to the attendees showing support for him. This is supported by the context of saying "my heart goes out to you" within seconds of the gesture (hitting the left side of his chest with his right hand and swinging that arm out to the crowd).

Do you not understand basic anatomy (where the heart lies in the body), were you unaware of what actually happened, is there something I am missing (hence I ask for an unbiased source), or do you just not care and want to smear him? If it's the latter, then you can claim dozens of liberal figures have also done the same. If it's anything else, I'm interested in hearing it.
 
I would just hit Ignore on him. He's chronically politically toxic, and not worth seeing in your feed (what you replied to looks like the usual BS). I've just accepted that there's no reasoning with someone so hateful online that they ignore facts, can't be wrong, and see everything as political. And considering this is (should be) a tech website, no skin off my back.


Otherwise, seems like the majority of shareholders like how good their Tesla stocks are doing under him. Why would they care to change that at this time?
Like him or not, the only people I've seen whining about it are outsiders who want him to fail. They don't actually give a good reason why or a better solution.
Kinda nuts to call people who are against Nazism and fascism "politically toxic". It's pretty reasonable for people to see a guy do Nazi salutes and decide they don't want to support it. Musk put himself into political controversy, now it's just part of the package.

Like I said in my past post, even if you support Musk, I just don't see him being worth 1T to the company given his current reputation.
 
Last edited:
I would think Tesla would do better with sales without him so that's why it seems crazy to me, or even if they did a little bit worse, I doubt they will do a trillion dollars worse. Tesla has a net worth of ~1.5T right now so a 1T pay out is huge. Even if it were Nvidia, it would be obscene. I just don't see him being worth 1T.



Magas always phrase things as if the only options are two extremes. There is a lot of room on the spectrum between Nazi and loony activist. Just a normal guy who doesn't do Nazi salutes but isn't particularly political either would be ideal. Even if you yourself are a Nazi and you love Musk so much you want to kiss him, on an investment level you have to wonder how much better Tesla or any company would do without a Nazi that literally makes people swear to never buy their products at the helm.


I really don't understand what Tesla needs from Musk at this point. They have an established business, I don't understand why they couldn't just carry on as normal without him. At one time he was a Steve Jobs level salesman, but that ship has sailed.
"loony activist" is a suitable description for someone voting against their financial interest for the purposes of virtue signalling. By the way, if the result weren't clear in advance, those voting against Musk would be zero - they voted against him knowing perfectly well he will win and they will not lose money by showing off their tribe allegiance.

Oh .. and don't embarrass yourself with that Nazi nonsense.
Unfortunately that word, along with racist, fascist etc. completely lost its meaning. Today it merely means the woke dislike someone.That fools many people, especially young folks, to believe someone described as a Nazi / racist / fascist is a good guy simply because he's not woke, and they know nothing worse than being woke.
 
Just mention Musk or Tesla and you get toxic posts… almost like Techspot knows this and want clicks…

People need to understand how compensation packages work. Tesla isn’t giving Musk 1 trillion dollars!!

In order to get this trillion, he has to increase their market cap from 1.5 trillion to 20 trillion…

If he can actually do that, he’d be worth WAY more than a trillion!

Like him or hate him, if he can increase an already wealthy company’s worth more than tenfold, wouldn’t he be worth virtually any price?!?
 
Given how controversial Musk is as a supporter of fascism and Nazism, it seems crazy that the Tesla board would want to pay out 1 trillion rather than just replace Musk.
You can't replace Elon, he IS freaking Tesla. Without him you have nothing.

The only way you could replace him is if he died of natural causes like how it happened with Jobs and Apple, else he will be there forever, as he NEEDS to be there.

People don't like him for this or that, but the main reason they don't like him is because he is a freaking genius. Say what you will about him, but in the grand scheme of things, he is someone that will move this country (and quite frankly the world) forward instead of stagnating. He knows we need to reach the stars and that is what he is so pioneering for with SpaceX.

I for one am glad he is around and hope he is for many decades to come, as this world needs him, badly.
 
Like I said in my past post, even if you support Musk, I just don't see how him being worth 1T to the company given his current reputation.
Then you have nothing to complain about. If he cannot lead Tesla to meeting all of the milestones, he won't be worth $1T. If he doesn't achieve enough objectives, he doesn't even get paid. Even if he meets every objective, the compensation is dependent upon:
- Meeting any objectives within 10 years
- Staying CEO for 7.5-10 after each objective
- Finding a CEO to succeed him
Afterwards, he cannot even sell the shares for another 5 years, so if he tried to game the market his shares could become worthless before ever being able to sell them. A more accurate way to describe the compensation is an incentive package. The earliest he can be paid is 12.5 - 15 years AFTER each objective. To be paid $1T, he would have to lead the business in a spectacular manner and it could be as far as 25 years away before he got paid.

As a shareholder myself, the chance that he gets paid everything within 25 years is small. Meeting each of those objectives would make me rich though, so that's why I voted for it. You'll also be hard-pressed to find other CEO's willing to risk accepting a compensation package. Those that do will work hard or leave the company before long.
 
Your basic premise is highly disputable. You should at least cite unbiased sources if you're going to continue to make outlandish claims like that. The logic needed to make that claim is the same logic as claiming that Chick-fil-a is a supporter of genocide in Africa.

You clearly didn't read the article.
No, you missed my point. Felon could do some real good in the world with that money, but it will be wasted on capitalism that no one can afford.
 
"loony activist" is a suitable description for someone voting against their financial interest for the purposes of virtue signalling. By the way, if the result weren't clear in advance, those voting against Musk would be zero - they voted against him knowing perfectly well he will win and they will not lose money by showing off their tribe allegiance.

Oh .. and don't embarrass yourself with that Nazi nonsense.
Unfortunately that word, along with racist, fascist etc. completely lost its meaning. Today it merely means the woke dislike someone.

The only people who argue this are sympathizers. You don't have to like my stance, but you can't deny doing this:

ccpiBn.gif


is bad for business.

I am a simple man. I see someone do a Nazi salute, I consider them a Nazi.
 
I am a simple man. I see someone do a Nazi salute, I consider them a Nazi.
and that’s why you’re “simple” (you said it first)… maybe wake up and see the world isn’t black and white…

I’d only call someone a Nazi if their beliefs and/or actions aligned with the tenets of National Socialism… a coincidental salute that is similar to a Nazi salute (which in itself isn’t original - it dates back to the Roman Empire and it probably went back further than that), doesn’t count..

When he starts sending Jews to the gas chambers - then I’ll call him a Nazi.
 
Back