Read the full article at:
https://www.techspot.com/review/523-ivy-bridge-intel-core-i7-3770k/
Please leave your feedback here.
https://www.techspot.com/review/523-ivy-bridge-intel-core-i7-3770k/
Please leave your feedback here.
This review is useless without telling us what temperatures you got with your overclock. I'm guessing they don't show them because the don't want to scare potential costumers when they see the cpu at over 100 degrees celsius!
The only ones hiding here are both of you "guests", it looks like you haven't seen any other review here, as you can see, in the last Bulldozer review, there was no temperatures chart neither in stock frequency or overclocked, so your point's not valid about "don't wanting to scare potential consumers". By fact, the review won't be extended just because you ask, and has nothing to do with Intel biasing.
Nope. Anandtech, Guru of 3D, HardOCP, Bit-tech, Tech Report for example....and the reason is fairly obvious. Motherboard, setup (chassis or open air test rig), and most importantly, cooler choice play too much a part in the variation between CPU's and CPU architecture. The "your mileage may vary" scenario comes fully into play - some motherboard manufacturers set up their BIOS's to gain from "stock/turbo" settings from the get-go, some boards don't clock without adding extra voltage for stability, and unless you're using the stock heatsink fans, how do you evaluate CPU temps across different platforms, using different settings and different cooling? Especially when the temp reporting on CPU's like the FX-8150 is borked...[FONT=Arial]unless you're of the school that believes that Bulldozer runs 7[/FONT]Every other professional site, and even some lousy sites, have temperatures in their review because it's as much a part of the review as anything else.
[/FONT]A6 and A4 were not included, I'm pretty sure that the on die gpu graphics beat the intel integrated graphics,
It's TTL (Time To Live) Customs. And the guys name is (Tiny) Tom Logan. His site also (OC3D) gave the 3770K a gold award with 10/10 for performance , so maybe the issue isn't as all-important as you seem to think..But TTL said on the TTLcostums Youtube channel that Intel tried to stop, or at least delay, him making his video about IVB because he was giving actual data on the insanely high temps.
Holy crap... 1.52V on air! What were the temps like?
I think overall the performance and power consumption are pretty much as expected... nothing to get too excited about and looking at the gaming performance I still don't have an urge to upgrade from Bloomfield.
Temperatures anyone? wtf?
I'm sure techspot might be aware of crazy temps, and they choose not to disclose it so they wont deter any customers from buying it.
I watched the video to see where you were coming from. I'm not sure how you can make that statement, when the video was not a comparison video. They were generalizing the characteristics between Ivy Bridge and Sandy Bridge but never once compared their performance. You come here making a claim and the guy in the video during the conclusion made it quite clear he wasn't willing to make.The 3770K would actually be a downgrade from a Sandybridge...
Comparison at ABT : 3770K vs 920 with both clocked at 4.2I would love to see the i7 920/930/950 @ 3.5Ghz against the i7-3770k.
I have a i7 930 @ 4.0Ghz and results like these make me happy I haven't upgraded yet.
Maybe they should be...if the review used the stock heatsink fan that comes packaged with the retail CPU. Know how many reviews used the stock HSF? Two. Hardware Secrets and Hot Hardware out of ~40 reviews that took an in depth look at the 3770K.It is assumed that temperature results are part of a CPU review.