The FCC just banned foreign-made drones from entering the US

midian182

Posts: 11,624   +176
Staff member
What just happened? The FCC has banned new foreign-made drones from being imported into the US over concerns that they present an "unacceptable risk" to national security and the safety and security of US persons. This means drones and related components from the likes of popular Chinese manufacturers DJI and Autel Robotics will not receive FCC approval unless the DoD or DHS recommends them.

The FCC added the foreign technologies to a Covered List this week, preventing them from receiving the agency's equipment authorization. Without it, the new drones cannot be imported, marketed, or sold in the United States.

"UAS and UAS critical components must be produced in the United States," the FCC said. "This will reduce the risk of direct UAS attacks and disruptions, unauthorized surveillance, sensitive data exfiltration, and other UAS threats to the homeland."

"UAS and UAS critical components, including data transmission devices, communications systems, flight controllers, ground control stations, controllers, navigation systems, batteries, smart batteries, and motors produced in a foreign country, could enable persistent surveillance, data exfiltration, and destructive operations over US territory."

The agency added that specific drones or components would be exempt from the ban if the Department of Defense or Department of Homeland Security determined they pose no risk.

It has also been emphasized that the ban does not impact consumers' ability to use drones they purchased. Moreover, retailers can continue selling, importing, and marketing foreign drones previously approved by the FCC (I.e., current ones).

The FCC said upcoming events being held in the US, including the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, the 2026 World Cup, and America250 celebrations, were reasons to address the potential drone threats posed by "criminals, hostile foreign actors, and terrorists."

DJI said it would continue to support the US market. "DJI is disappointed by the Federal Communications Commission's action today to add foreign-made drones to the Covered List. While DJI was not singled out, no information has been released regarding what information was used by the Executive Branch in reaching its determination," said a DJI spokesperson.

DJI added that its existing products can continue to be purchased and operated as usual, and that its future drones may be cleared by the DoD or DHS.

Signs that a ban was coming have been around for a while. In June last year, the House of Representatives rolled out their version of the National Defense Authorization Act for 2025 (NDAA FY25). It resurrected the "Countering CCP Drones Act" – the same provision that previously pushed for a blanket prohibition on the sale of Chinese-made drones. But the Senate Armed Services Committee released its counterpart to the NDAA FY25 a month later, omitting the controversial drone clause.

In December 2024, the Senate passed the NDAA, triggering a one-year deadline until DJI and Autel Robotics products were automatically banned from sale in the US. The only way out was for the companies to convince an appropriate national security agency to publicly declare that their products do not "pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States."

President Trump signed the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 into law last week, requiring national security agencies to evaluate the risks associated with foreign-manufactured drones and related technologies.

Permalink to story:

 
Utter stupidity. A random hobbyist’s drone poses so little risk it’s laughable.

Any bad actors can do whatever imagined bad deed with available drones.

Spy satellites and hacking the millions of cameras everywhere in the country provide far more intelligence.

Just consider a ring camera leak vs where a random dude is deciding to fly his drone.

Another loss for average Americans so we can “own” China on twitter.
 
Good grief! Spying? You can get better data from google earth, street view, not to mention the data from cell phones. Oh, and what about the CIA/FBI/NSA or other alphabet agencies "listening" in?
 
What problem is this solving? It doesn't solve a damn thing. Unintelligent cowards made this decision.
 
*grabs script*
"Land of the... Free"?

Am I reading this right?

Of course free! Free from best sanely priced phones in the world and freed the world from them (Huawei). Free from best wallet friendly drones but this time didn’t even try to free the world from it as everyone remembers Huawei.

Land of the free from chosing anything deemed threatening certain big domestic companies (Apple).
 
Here's the problem: this may seem paranoid, but just like with ByteDance and TikTok, DJI is a Chinese corporation. It is therefore subject to government surveillance because of CCP edict. It's not like the US government doesn't also engage in wiretapping, but at least in the United States, we still have the Constitution and FOIA. There is at least a pretense that warrantless surveillance cannot go completely unchecked.

The only way for DJI to assuage fears of foreign sabotage would be to provide a degree of access to confidential company secrets, demonstrating―in no uncertain terms―a complete absence of hardware that could feasibly be used to spy on US citizens by the CCP. However, doing this would basically be the US government using DJI as a proxy to openly wage information warfare against the Chinese government and put our tenuous business allyship with them in jeopardy. Which is exactly why it won't happen.

It's not an exaggeration to say that the American people value the freedom to buy cheap junk over their autonomy as a nation state. Why else would we have allowed China to manufacture everything? Not for the quality, that's for certain.
 
Here's the problem: this may seem paranoid, but just like with ByteDance and TikTok, DJI is a Chinese corporation. It is therefore subject to government surveillance because of CCP edict. It's not like the US government doesn't also engage in wiretapping, but at least in the United States, we still have the Constitution and FOIA. There is at least a pretense that warrantless surveillance cannot go completely unchecked.

The only way for DJI to assuage fears of foreign sabotage would be to provide a degree of access to confidential company secrets, demonstrating―in no uncertain terms―a complete absence of hardware that could feasibly be used to spy on US citizens by the CCP. However, doing this would basically be the US government using DJI as a proxy to openly wage information warfare against the Chinese government and put our tenuous business allyship with them in jeopardy. Which is exactly why it won't happen.

It's not an exaggeration to say that the American people value the freedom to buy cheap junk over their autonomy as a nation state. Why else would we have allowed China to manufacture everything? Not for the quality, that's for certain.
But there is no automatic upload of your videos. That is still a manual process. I get what you are saying, and it's accurate for TikTok. It is not for the DJI drones, however. Also, most drone pilots do post editing, so all the original metadata is not in the final product. This is a pure FUD decision.
 
Back