The Pentagon just signed AI deals with OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and Nvidia - and cut Anthropic out entirely

Skye Jacobs

Posts: 2,010   +58
Staff
What just happened? The Pentagon has finalized a sweeping set of AI agreements with some of the industry's biggest names, opening classified military environments to models and infrastructure from OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Oracle, Nvidia, SpaceX, and newcomer Reflection AI. The deals mark a significant expansion of how artificial intelligence is used inside the Defense Department, consolidating access that had previously been scattered or subject to tighter restrictions.

Defense officials have framed the effort as a necessary step to keep pace with both technological change and geopolitical competition. "We are equipping the warfighter with a suite of AI tools to maintain an unfair advantage and achieve absolute decision superiority," Emil Michael, the undersecretary of defense for research and engineering, told the Wall Street Journal.

Several companies in the group, including OpenAI and SpaceX, had already signed preliminary agreements with the military. The new contracts allow those relationships to expand into daily operations covering analysis, logistics, and large-scale data processing.

The vendor mix reflects the extent to which AI development is tied to cloud infrastructure. Microsoft, Amazon, and Oracle are not only building models but also providing the underlying compute environments where those models run. That combination allows the Pentagon to deploy AI systems within existing secure cloud frameworks, rather than building new infrastructure from scratch.

At the same time, the inclusion of Nvidia and Reflection AI signals a push toward open-source models. Nvidia's agreement centers on its Nemotron models, which are designed to support autonomous agents capable of carrying out multi-step tasks. Because these models are open, their internal architecture can be inspected and modified, which is useful for tailoring systems to specific defense use cases.

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has argued that this transparency can be an advantage in national security settings. "Safety and security is frankly enhanced with open-source," he said in a recent conversation with the Special Competitive Studies Project.

That view carries geopolitical weight. Chinese firms have aggressively distributed open AI models internationally, and US officials increasingly see domestic open-source development as a strategic imperative.

Reflection AI, a newer company backed by Nvidia, fits into that effort. Founded by former Google DeepMind researchers, the startup is working on open-source systems and has been involved in a government-supported initiative to develop models tailored for the South Korean market. The company has not yet released a model but is reportedly seeking funding at a $25 billion valuation.

"This shared understanding with the Pentagon is a first step in supporting US national security, and sets a precedent for how AI labs could work across the US government – from supporting our servicemembers to our scientists," a Reflection spokeswoman said.

The Pentagon's expanded roster of AI providers follows a breakdown in its relationship with Anthropic. The company's Claude models had been among the few available in classified settings, largely through Palantir's Maven platform. After a contract dispute, the Defense Department labeled Anthropic a supply-chain risk, effectively cutting off its systems and accelerating efforts to bring in other vendors. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, speaking during congressional testimony, called Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei an "ideological lunatic."

Anthropic is now challenging that designation in court. Its models had previously been used in military contexts, including during the Iran conflict and in an operation targeting Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro earlier this year.

But not everything is on the table. Several companies involved in the agreements have said their technologies will not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous weapons.

The Defense Department has said those uses would be illegal and has urged companies to trust its oversight. What is changing, though, is the role AI plays inside the military. With access to a broader range of models and the infrastructure to run them securely, the Pentagon is moving beyond experimentation.

Permalink to story:

 
The Pentagon has finalized a sweeping set of AI agreements with some of the industry's biggest names, opening classified military environments to models and infrastructure from Open AI, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Oracle, Nvidia, SpaceX
a.k.a The Skynet Group.

Everything foretold in the Terminator movie is coming to reality. In fact, feels like they use it the guideline - "How to end the world. For Dummies"
 
Anthropic fukced up big time trying to usurp decision making power from the government . They were rightly slapped and cut off.
All the fearmongering nonsense about their mythical Mythos model being 'too dangerous' was a sorry attempt to undo the Pentagon fukcup and return to negotiation, but it failed miserably. Meanwhile the last iteration of Claude was a disappointment, and whatever perceived advantage Anthropic may have had, it's now lost. Hopefully this will serve as a lesson.
 
That will teach them!
But to be serious, what are they gaining from not participating with Pentagon.
The worst things that can be done with AI are practiced as we speak in N. Korea, China, and others.
We are not going to gain anything by not using AI for military purposes.
Perhaps, they made that decision with a specific accident in mind: remember when NSA paid to make the most advanced hacking tools, which later leaked to all who wanted? Some of them were tested and proved to be working even years later. This is a valid concern: I do not want my product to be used to be mishandled and then cause harm. From this angle it makes sense.
 
But to be serious, what are they gaining from not participating with Pentagon.
The worst things that can be done with AI are practiced as we speak in N. Korea, China, and others.
We are not going to gain anything by not using AI for military purposes.
Perhaps, they made that decision with a specific accident in mind: remember when NSA paid to make the most advanced hacking tools, which later leaked to all who wanted? Some of them were tested and proved to be working even years later. This is a valid concern: I do not want my product to be used to be mishandled and then cause harm. From this angle it makes sense.
They gain not helping kill people.

There are valid reasons for war and weapons of war, but not everyone wants that on their conscience.

Especially when we seem rather fond of less noble reasons for it lately.
 
I just watched a video by Matt Walsh talking about Anthropic. He also provided some very interesting links about one of Anthropic's top employees. I recommend it: Ep. 1771, available on YT.
 
That will teach them!
But to be serious, what are they gaining from not participating with Pentagon.
The worst things that can be done with AI are practiced as we speak in N. Korea, China, and others.
We are not going to gain anything by not using AI for military purposes.
Perhaps, they made that decision with a specific accident in mind: remember when NSA paid to make the most advanced hacking tools, which later leaked to all who wanted? Some of them were tested and proved to be working even years later. This is a valid concern: I do not want my product to be used to be mishandled and then cause harm. From this angle it makes sense.
You think these companies don't make custom AIs for the military and that they'll just give access to the civilian stuff?
 
a.k.a The Skynet Group.

Everything foretold in the Terminator movie is coming to reality. In fact, feels like they use it the guideline - "How to end the world. For Dummies"
"Terminator" was about as realistically prophetic as the Muppet Movie.

They gain not helping kill people.
Anthropic would have been the people in WW2 "conscientiously objecting" to killing Nazis ... but still benefiting from the sacrifices everyone else made to do so.
 
You think these companies don't make custom AIs for the military and that they'll just give access to the civilian stuff?
I do not think, and I do not know. What I know is that they will use those AI models to squeeze the most out of them, including purposes that are not very ethical.
 
In one bit of good news Meta didn't even get a mention.
In a world in which the majority of a country voted for Donald Trump to be their head of state small crumbs of comfort are all we get...
 
So, "Several companies involved in the agreements have said their technologies will not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous weapons." and the Pentagon "has urged companies to trust its oversight."

Trust the oversight! From the people who armed the Mujahideen, trained Noriega, sold Saddam the chemical precursors, and then fought all three of them.

Larry Ellison's Oracle is in there too, which is its own joke. Oracle's main AI contribution to civilization so far has been licensing audits. Now they're going to help win wars, equipped with a suite of compliance traps with 500-page non-compliance notices for the enemies.
 
Trust the oversight! From the people who armed the Mujahideen, trained Noriega, sold Saddam the chemical precursors, and then fought all three of them.
It's difficult to predict when friends can turn to enemies, or vice versa. The US traded with Japan and Germany before we decimated both nations in WW2 -- and we're now trading with them again. Do you believe we should halt all relations with them?

Oh, and Saddam Hossein's chemical weapons produtiction plants were built by Germany (Karl Kolb and ThyssenKrupp) and the vast majority of their precursor chemicals came from the Netherlands and Singapore. A US firm provided one dual-use chemical used primarily for making inks and dyes.

Note that, two years later, when the US attacked and destroyed these chemical weapons facilities, both Germany and the Netherlands refused to send combat troops or assist directly; they merely provided a tiny amount of token "logistics support".
 
a.k.a The Skynet Group.

Everything foretold in the Terminator movie is coming to reality. In fact, feels like they use it the guideline - "How to end the world. For Dummies"

Oof, want more end of the world lore?

Research the Samson Option.

"Do what we want or suicide bomb the planet"
 
Back