The solar system may have a sixth dwarf planet, hidden against the Milky Way

zohaibahd

Posts: 1,015   +21
Staff
First look: The solar system's official roster of dwarf planets has held at five names since 2008. But a new observatory in Chile has spotted an icy world beyond Pluto that could become the sixth. It might also be the largest object found out past Neptune in about 20 years.

For now, the object announced by the Vera C. Rubin Observatory team earlier this week only goes by its provisional designation, 2026 ED138. It currently sits about 46 astronomical units from the Sun. Pluto, by comparison, averages around 40.

Nobody has measured its size directly yet. Instead, astronomers worked backward from how bright it looks at that distance, plus an estimate of how reflective its surface is, to arrive at somewhere between 600 and 1,500 km across. Even the middle of that range sits close to Ceres, the smallest dwarf planet on the official list. Rubin's solar system lead Mario Jurić put it at roughly 1,000 km and called it a once-in-a-generation kind of find.

It stayed hidden this long mostly because of where it sits in the sky. From Earth, ED138 lines up close to the plane of the Milky Way, where it's just one more faint dot against millions of background stars.

But Rubin photographs the whole southern sky every few nights with the largest digital camera ever built for astronomy, so the same dot keeps turning up in a slightly different spot. On October 13, Harvard & Smithsonian astrophysicist Matthew Holman ran data from earlier this year through a search code he wrote with colleague Kevin Napier.

ED138 caught his eye because it looked far too bright for something that far out. Holman admitted his first instinct was to check whether he or the code had messed up.

Jurić's search through Rubin's catalog put that doubt to rest – the object shows up in 30 images across 20 nights between March and July. Older survey images push its track all the way back to 2016, too.

None of that settles whether it's a dwarf planet, though. To earn the label, an object has to be massive enough for its own gravity to pull it round. Confirming that for ED138 will take infrared observations that can nail down its true size.

Even then, an official title could take a while. Quaoar and Gonggong are already treated as dwarf planets in plenty of research papers, yet the International Astronomical Union still hasn't added either one to its list. In the meantime, anyone curious can follow ED138's orbit in 3D on Orbitviewer.

Permalink to story:

 
The IAU is flawed. I’ve long held that they lazily redefined “planet” 20 years ago at the 26th General Assembly. They planned the decision for when everybody would have left the conference, at the very end of a 12 day International session. Less than 20% of scientists counted in attendance at Prague were still present to “vote” on the definition (by holding up yellow cards lol). That’s hardly a quorum for an important scientific decision. Source: https://www.researchgate.net/public...ition_Some_Confusions_and_Their_Modifications

The definition is entirely subjective, and based on a half baked theory for how planets are formed. Even the definition was rushed, simply because Eris was discovered at the time. It was hotly contested at the time, and should not be considered “settled” science by any means. There still has been nothing settled for what “clearing the neighborhood” means for a planet lol. It’s so vague that by some measures Pluto could even be reconsidered a planet. See more about this topic on the Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAU_definition_of_planet

One thing to add to the article: Pluto’s orbit is pretty eccentric. At some points it’s closer to the Sun than Neptune. So its distance from the sun varies from 30-50 AU.
 
The IAU is flawed. I’ve long held that they lazily redefined “planet” 20 years ago at the 26th General Assembly. They planned the decision for when everybody would have left the conference, at the very end of a 12 day International session. Less than 20% of scientists counted in attendance at Prague were still present to “vote” on the definition (by holding up yellow cards lol). That’s hardly a quorum for an important scientific decision. Source: https://www.researchgate.net/public...ition_Some_Confusions_and_Their_Modifications

The definition is entirely subjective, and based on a half baked theory for how planets are formed. Even the definition was rushed, simply because Eris was discovered at the time. It was hotly contested at the time, and should not be considered “settled” science by any means. There still has been nothing settled for what “clearing the neighborhood” means for a planet lol. It’s so vague that by some measures Pluto could even be reconsidered a planet. See more about this topic on the Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IAU_definition_of_planet

One thing to add to the article: Pluto’s orbit is pretty eccentric. At some points it’s closer to the Sun than Neptune. So its distance from the sun varies from 30-50 AU.
I grew up with Pluto as a planet, and think it should be a planet again, even if only out of convention.
 
The reason pluton is a dwarf planet is because we know now there are many other dwarf planets of similar size if the Kuiper Belt, where Pluto is.

It's still a planet, just a dwarf planet, and it's smaller than the moon.

6VvqtujHDPdj7HH7NYNSd9-650-80.jpg
 
The IAU may have only recognized 5 dwarf planets in our Solar System thus far, but by its own definition, there are HUNDREDS of bodies that qualify. So this will not by a "sixth" dwarf planet at all. The IAU has refused to touch this hot-button topic because of the blowback against demoting Pluto from "full planet" status, and they've just decided to let all of the other trans-Neptunian bodies remain in limbo for awhile. But eventually, we'll have gathered enough information on these tiny planets that someone will move to officially recognize the next 10, then the next 30, then the next 100, and so on...
 
Back