The US just admitted, for the first time, that it has weapons deployed in space

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,628   +79
Staff
Why it matters: The idea of militarizing outer space is as old as the space race itself, but the US has not openly admitted to deploying weapons beyond Earth's atmosphere until now. While the confirmation was likely intended as a deterrent, the effectiveness of the Air Force secretary's vague statement remains unclear.

Air Force Secretary Troy Meink said at a Monday event that the US has deployed weapons in orbit to defend against hostile action. The admission crosses a new boundary following decades of peaceful international competition and cooperation in space.

Meink did not specify the nature of the weapons, according to CNN. However, the statement, made at the Air, Space and Cyber Conference in Maryland, remains significant because it represents a major shift in the US's posture toward outer space.

The declaration is likely aimed at China and Russia, which the US has long accused of developing and potentially testing military applications that could threaten orbital infrastructure. However, as a deterrent, its impact could be limited because other countries still lack a clear idea of the US's destructive capabilities in space.

While the statement is significant, it likely does not violate space law. The Outer Space Treaty of 1967 prohibits deploying nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in orbit but does not explicitly forbid conventional weapons.

Currently, the most viable theoretical space weapons would aim to neutralize communication satellites by jamming or destroying them. For example, Russia has previously warned that satellites supporting the defense of Ukraine, such as those used by Starlink, would be considered legitimate military targets. Late last year, intelligence services from two NATO countries claimed that Russia is developing a method of attacking satellites using clouds of tiny projectiles orbiting Earth at high velocities, but whether the country could deploy such a weapon remains unclear.

The US Space Force has also accused China of practicing coordinated satellite movements in low Earth orbit that it described as "dogfighting." Meanwhile, one theoretical defensive method might involve stationing a shielded mobile launch platform in orbit.

Outside of military applications, the Moon has once again become a major focus of the space race between countries and private companies. American and European space agencies, along with China, have spent recent years conceptualizing a lunar economy that could involve permanent habitats, data centers, power plants, and other infrastructure.

Permalink to story:

 
Unreal. F*ck nationalism.

Humans have been around for thousands of years, we've seen some of the greatest civilizations in the world come and go.....and yet here we are, in the present day, STILL "sabre-rattling" and constantly trying to one-up each other as though our lives depended on it.

Are we ever going to grow up.....and out of all this childish playground sh*t?

It's long been said that we're nowt but parasites upon Mother Gaia's back.....and the sooner she gives us the 'heave-ho', the sooner the planet will return to some semblance of normality.

I can see it happening "sooner" RATHER than "later".....and our demise will be 100% self-inflicted.

Crazy.

Miq.
 
"and yet here we are, in the present day, STILL "sabre-rattling" and constantly trying to one-up each other as though our lives depended on it"

Ridiculous generalization. Some countries do not value private property, some countries do not honor agreements, some countries easily lie about not developing one or another virus.
There are plenty of countries that firmly believe that one or more of their neighbors took their lands in a moment of weakness. Given the ability to get away with starting with another bloody local or global war, they will not hesitate to take it.
How many years ago would Taiwan be occupied and degraded to the China's level if it was not for our army and modern weapons?

We are not trying to one up each other, we are trying to survive. In a world where there are monsters, there must be monster hunters or at least safe places.
 
I sometime wonder why some things are released which will tell enemies what we have. But then maybe it's just a quencher. Sometimes flexing muscles don't work.
 
Unreal. F*ck nationalism.

Humans have been around for thousands of years, we've seen some of the greatest civilizations in the world come and go.....and yet here we are, in the present day, STILL "sabre-rattling" and constantly trying to one-up each other as though our lives depended on it.

Are we ever going to grow up.....and out of all this childish playground sh*t?

It's long been said that we're nowt but parasites upon Mother Gaia's back.....and the sooner she gives us the 'heave-ho', the sooner the planet will return to some semblance of normality.

I can see it happening "sooner" RATHER than "later".....and our demise will be 100% self-inflicted.

Crazy.

Miq.

Welcome to humanity, and it’s never going to change.
 
Would be kinda funny if it was revealed that the "space weapons" were just blowing up one of our satellites or whatever to create tons of space debris. Navigating around space debris is no joke.
 
Remember that it's totally acceptable when we do the thing that we lambast other nations for doing - because we're the good guys.


(It saddens me how many people buy that as a legitimate argument.)
 
Remember that it's totally acceptable when we do the thing that we lambast other nations for doing - because we're the good guys.


(It saddens me how many people buy that as a legitimate argument.)
As much I despise the hypocrisy I also realize something else - Hopefully you dont really believe that other hostile nations would voluntarily abide by a "gentleman's agreement" not to deploy weapons in space?

Because they wouldn't. Publicly they would deny their own and decry for the US even entertaining the idea. Secretly they would for sure do it if they could. So they're also hypocrites in the end just as US is.

Personally I say good. Why should the US limit itself when others blatantly dont?

If you want a recent example, look at the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Under this 1987 agreement, the US and Russia pledged not to possess, produce, or test land-based ballistic or cruise missiles with ranges between 500 km and 5,500 km. However, Russia secretly developed and fielded the 9M729 (SSC-8) ground-launched cruise missile, which US and NATO intelligence confirmed exceeded the 500 km threshold. The US abided by the agreement—voluntarily capping its land-based missiles below 500 km—until formally withdrawing in August 2019 due to Russian non-compliance. Following the collapse of the treaty, the US began developing land-based systems with ranges extending well beyond 500 km.
 
As much I despise the hypocrisy I also realize something else - Hopefully you dont really believe that other hostile nations would voluntarily abide by a "gentleman's agreement" not to deploy weapons in space?

Because they wouldn't. Publicly they would deny their own and decry for the US even entertaining the idea. Secretly they would for sure do it if they could. So they're also hypocrites in the end just as US is.

Personally I say good. Why should the US limit itself when others blatantly dont?

If you want a recent example, look at the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Under this 1987 agreement, the US and Russia pledged not to possess, produce, or test land-based ballistic or cruise missiles with ranges between 500 km and 5,500 km. However, Russia secretly developed and fielded the 9M729 (SSC-8) ground-launched cruise missile, which US and NATO intelligence confirmed exceeded the 500 km threshold. The US abided by the agreement—voluntarily capping its land-based missiles below 500 km—until formally withdrawing in August 2019 due to Russian non-compliance. Following the collapse of the treaty, the US began developing land-based systems with ranges extending well beyond 500 km.
100% this.
 

The US just admitted, for the first time, that it has weapons deployed in space​


There is no US hegemony in Space.... But there is one on earth which is diminishing by minutes...!
 
As much I despise the hypocrisy I also realize something else - Hopefully you dont really believe that other hostile nations would voluntarily abide by a "gentleman's agreement" not to deploy weapons in space?

Because they wouldn't. Publicly they would deny their own and decry for the US even entertaining the idea. Secretly they would for sure do it if they could. So they're also hypocrites in the end just as US is.

Personally I say good. Why should the US limit itself when others blatantly dont?

If you want a recent example, look at the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Under this 1987 agreement, the US and Russia pledged not to possess, produce, or test land-based ballistic or cruise missiles with ranges between 500 km and 5,500 km. However, Russia secretly developed and fielded the 9M729 (SSC-8) ground-launched cruise missile, which US and NATO intelligence confirmed exceeded the 500 km threshold. The US abided by the agreement—voluntarily capping its land-based missiles below 500 km—until formally withdrawing in August 2019 due to Russian non-compliance. Following the collapse of the treaty, the US began developing land-based systems with ranges extending well beyond 500 km.
There are two issues we need to separate.
1. There are some things you just can't do and still be the good guys even if the enemy is. Biological weapons and other war crimes fall into this category.

2. We should do what we promise. Take your example, we followed the treaty until it became clear the other side wasn't then we exited the treaty. If we can't trust the other side to abide by such a treaty going in, we shouldn't do it.

So the issue isn't putting weapons in space. It's decrying China for secret weapons in space while we also have secret weapons in space.
 
Back