The Windows XP Bliss wallpaper still exists, and it briefly looks the same again

Alfonso Maruccia

Posts: 2,508   +934
Staff
Nostalgic XP: Once a stock photo sold to a licensing agency, the "Bliss" wallpaper became a computer sensation thanks to Microsoft and Windows XP's resounding popularity. The natural environment looks much different today, but that particular Californian landscape can still offer a pleasant view under the right conditions.

A Reddit user recently visited the Napa Valley location where the "Bliss" wallpaper was photographed. The view now closely matches the original image, which became a technology icon after Microsoft chose it as the default wallpaper for Windows XP.

The Redditor recently visited the location with a friend. They stopped to photograph the Bliss hills, capturing a view strikingly similar to the Windows XP wallpaper. The Redditor said such conditions are "super rare" because the hill is usually covered in grapevines or dry, dead grass.

Other Redditors said Bliss now resembles the XP photo again – minus the different cloud formations – after recent wet weather in California. Others used the image as their new Windows 11 wallpaper, while nearby residents are planning to revisit the area to see how the hill looks without vineyard rows or pest infestations.

Charles O'Rear shot the original Bliss photo in 1996 while working for National Geographic. It later became a stock image licensed by Corbis. Microsoft acquired the rights in 2000 and bundled the image with Windows XP. The NT-based operating system sold more than 400 million copies in its first five years, meaning hundreds of millions of people – and likely more through Windows media coverage – have seen the iconic wallpaper at least once.

O'Rear took his photo on film, shooting with a Mamiya RZ67 medium-format camera while he was going to visit his girlfriend. People speculated that the original photo was somewhat altered with Photoshop due to its striking features. However, the photographer has always claimed he did not alter the natural shot in any way. The Redditor likely took the new photo with a smartphone, and it shows.

Twenty-five years after the release of Windows XP, Microsoft is now following a completely different approach in choosing wallpapers for its operating systems. Windows 11 wallpapers are mostly over-retouched, synthetic, or AI-generated images, with very few taken from natural scenery with particularly striking views. Perhaps this is why people still nostalgically look back at a Windows XP wallpaper and think, "When did it all go wrong?"

Permalink to story:

 
I wanna go back. This AI, rage bait, social media future sucks. I just want to cut wood in RuneScape and go play in the woods with my friends. I look at this picture and can smell the computer room at my parent's house
 
Last edited:
Indeed, when did it all go wrong? The '90s and 2000s was Microsoft's golden age. Everything started going down the toilet from 2012.

This week, I was sorting out my grandfather's laptops. The old one has 7 and the new one 10. I was stunned at how beautiful 7 still looks, every nook and cranny of it being polished, and it is still a joy to use. 10 felt dull in comparison, and let's not even talk about 11.
 
the photographer has always claimed he did not alter the natural shot in any way

Yeah, right. People who never leave their house might even believe that. I, with a couple thousand KMs in my hiking feet, don't. There's no place and time on Earth with these colors.
 
Indeed, when did it all go wrong? The '90s and 2000s was Microsoft's golden age. Everything started going down the toilet from 2012.

This week, I was sorting out my grandfather's laptops. The old one has 7 and the new one 10. I was stunned at how beautiful 7 still looks, every nook and cranny of it being polished, and it is still a joy to use. 10 felt dull in comparison, and let's not even talk about 11.
I Still love 7's UI. MS nailed it with 7. The OS handled things that the user didn't need to think about but still gave you access when you wanted it. It was easy to navigate, it never got in your way when you wanted to do something. I think the best thing about 7 is that you never KNEW you were using windows. The idea that you were using windows was an after thought. It never got in the way with you using your computer.

I'm gonna beat a dead horse here for a second. This is what I love about Linux, it never gets between me and my computer. The idea that I'm using Linux is an after thought. When I'm using my work computer, I'm constantly thinking "I hate 11, I hate 11, I hate 11, what does 11 do this to me?! I hate 11". If Windows 7 was still a thing I probably never would have switched to Linux.

Here is a funny thing, for a long time my dad dual booted 98SE and XP. I, for whatever reason, always hated the XP UI, I always preferred the "grey box" look of 98. I was never able to warm up to the look of XP and even jumped to Vista just because I hated the look of XP. Granted, I had a new PC that wasn't plagued with the issues that Vista was known for at the time, but that was basically the sole reason I switched to Vista.

Yeah, right. People who never leave their house might even believe that. I, with a couple thousand KMs in my hiking feet, don't. There's no place and time on Earth with these colors.
You've never been to Pennsylvania, then. You can find views likes this 20 minutes outside the city
 
Last edited:
I Still love 7's UI. MS nailed it with 7. The OS handled things that the user didn't need to think about but still gave you access when you wanted it. It was easy to navigate, it never got in your way when you wanted to do something. I think the best thing about 7 is that you never KNEW you were using windows. The idea that you were using windows was an after thought. It never got in the way with you using your computer.

I'm gonna beat a dead horse here for a second. This is what I love about Linux, it never gets between me and my computer. The idea that I'm using Linux is an after thought. When I'm using my work computer, I'm constantly thinking "I hate 11, I hate 11, I hate 11, what does 11 do this to me?! I hate 11". If Windows 7 was still a thing I probably never would have switched to Linux.

Here is a funny thing, for a long time my dad dual booted 98SE and XP. I, for whatever reason, always hated the XP UI, I always preferred the "grey box" look of 98. I was never able to warm up to the look of XP and even jumped to Vista just because I hated the look of XP. Granted, I had a new PC that wasn't plagued with the issues that Vista was known for at the time, but that was basically the sole reason I switched to Vista.

Exactly. An OS should be largely invisible, letting the user get on with their work or entertainment. With modern Windows, we are always thinking about the OS because it purposely tries to show itself, like a peacock flourishing its feathers, and this is the cardinal mistake, apart from all the technical breakages of late. I can only describe 7 as being magic. The developers deserve a round of applause wherever they are today.

Many did prefer the classic, grey theme instead XP's Luna, and one could disable it. I liked XP's look, but it hasn't aged too well. 7's implementation of Aero, on the other hand, looks just as good today. If Microsoft had any brains, they'd just re-enable it to users' delight.
 
Exactly. An OS should be largely invisible, letting the user get on with their work or entertainment. With modern Windows, we are always thinking about the OS because it purposely tries to show itself, like a peacock flourishing its feathers, and this is the cardinal mistake, apart from all the technical breakages of late. I can only describe 7 as being magic. The developers deserve a round of applause wherever they are today.

Many did prefer the classic, grey theme instead XP's Luna, and one could disable it. I liked XP's look, but it hasn't aged too well. 7's implementation of Aero, on the other hand, looks just as good today. If Microsoft had any brains, they'd just re-enable it to users' delight.
I got in trouble a few months ago because when I was at work I yelled at my computer and said "Oh, will you just shut the **** up" because windows was hounding me while I was trying to work. I was going over something in solid works in a meeting and co-polite kept prompting me with "helpful suggestions". The client thought it was hilarious but my immediate manager wasn't happy. Keep in mind, I'm a blue collar guy so asking me to give a presentation isn't the best idea, lol.
 
Indeed, when did it all go wrong? The '90s and 2000s was Microsoft's golden age. Everything started going down the toilet from 2012.

This week, I was sorting out my grandfather's laptops. The old one has 7 and the new one 10. I was stunned at how beautiful 7 still looks, every nook and cranny of it being polished, and it is still a joy to use. 10 felt dull in comparison, and let's not even talk about 11.

It went wrong when computers (and the internet) went mainstream.
 
Show me the unaltered pics from there with colors like this then.
Bad time of year for it, but I do take my camera to work with me so I would be more than happy to show you some of the awesome places I get to work
 
I never liked the interface colors of Windows XP. There were some files that you could extract and copy over from the Media Center edition to change the interface slightly, I preferred that look a lot better.
 
I got in trouble a few months ago because when I was at work I yelled at my computer and said "Oh, will you just shut the **** up" because windows was hounding me while I was trying to work. I was going over something in solid works in a meeting and co-polite kept prompting me with "helpful suggestions". The client thought it was hilarious but my immediate manager wasn't happy. Keep in mind, I'm a blue collar guy so asking me to give a presentation isn't the best idea, lol.

Well, with the state of Windows today, I'd imagine there are lot of expletives being sent its way, and certainly warranted. My patience ran thin the other day trying to customise the Office 2024 installation, where you've got to create an XML file just to exclude the unwanted applications. Progress.
 
the photographer has always claimed he did not alter the natural shot in any way ...
Yeah, right. People who never leave their house might even believe that. I, with a couple thousand KMs in my hiking feet, don't. There's no place and time on Earth with these colors.
Depends on ... what do you consider as altered/unaltered.

Are those bright, contrast, curves adjusting image altering?
Up to some degree one can do that in camera.
 
Show me the unaltered pics from there with colors like this then.
Nope. Shouldn't have said that. Dude is right. You're going to eat crow. I think the problem is you live in an area where, yes, there are no colors like that. It doesn't mean there aren't places where the colors ARE like that and it's not the city or it's outskirts, where it's all bland greens, dull grays and dirty yellows.

There are LOTS of places that are impossibly infused with color, you just aren't near one.
 
Yeah, right. People who never leave their house might even believe that. I, with a couple thousand KMs in my hiking feet, don't. There's no place and time on Earth with these colors.

Then you need to move somewhere that isn't a trash heap because these colors easily exist in nature without needing any kind of editing. I am seriously into photography, and I guess I must hike a lot more than you because I have images even better than this that did not require anything but sharpening.
 
Back