This new AI fighter jet doesn't need pilots, runways, or GPS

midian182

Posts: 11,624   +176
Staff member
What just happened? Remember the AI-controlled jet that the US Air Force successfully tested in a dogfight last year? The same AI pilot responsible for that feat has just debuted in a fully autonomous stealth drone, though it is being referred to as a fighter jet. The vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) craft can operate not just without humans, but also without runways.

Shield AI revealed X-BAT this week, an autonomous VTOL fighter jet that it said can take off from islands and ships. "Airpower without runways is the holy grail of deterrence. It gives our forces persistence, reach, and survivability, and it buys diplomacy another day," said Brandon Tseng, Shield AI co-founder, president, and former Navy SEAL.

The headline feature, of course, is that the aircraft uses Shield AI's Hivemind. It's the same technology used in the Lockheed Martin X-62A VISTA modified F-16 that took on a human fighter in a dogfight last year – we still don't know who won that simulated battle.

Shield AI told Business Insider that X-BAT, which is powered by a single afterburning jet engine, can complete missions without any human pilot involvement and can advance without GPS or reliable communications.

The company says that the X-BAT is a multirole fighter capable of strike, counter air, electronic warfare, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) missions. With a range of 2,000 nautical miles and able to operate at altitudes of 50,000 feet, it can act as a lone fighter or a drone wingman that works closely with human pilots to help protect them on missions. It's also able to take off from ships, islands, carriers, runways, or tankers.

At 26 ft long and with a 39 ft wingspan, X-BAT is a lot smaller than a standard fighter jet. It can carry both air-to-air and air-to-surface missiles and has external hardpoints for larger munitions.

As it doesn't need a runway, a large amphibious warships could carry up to 60 X-BATs. They could also be launched from non-military vessels such as container ships. Armor Harris, Shield AI's senior vice president of aircraft engineering, said it can be used by the US Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Army, or allied forces.

X-BAT was unveiled at an event before an audience of military leaders, elected officials, and industry partners this week. It's still unclear if it will become part of the US armed forces, but given that the military and DoD are already developing, testing, and employing unmanned and partially-autonomous drones, this seems like the next obvious step.

The first X-BAT flight is scheduled for next year, with production planned for 2029.

Autonomous weapons are a particularly hot topic right now. There have been calls to ban so-called "killer robots," but the US has long used the argument that the final decision to engage a target rests with humans, not machines.

Permalink to story:

 
This is one good example of why AI is far from a fad used for making slop and meme. At the minute real implementation in government and defense are going to occur, people are going to grasp what is coming.

Robotics is the next big step to.
 
Clickbait. The article’s claims don’t square with basic reality.

Any platform truly capable of full autonomy, GPS-independent navigation, and multirole combat operations wouldn’t be publicly showcased—it would remain highly classified.

This is the military peeps. They don’t unveil their most advanced weaponry at public industry events nor do they share them with reporters.
 
I thought Stealth (and I ducked out of that after perhaps fifteen minutes). Where's da kiddies of da time?
 
The ONLY way I would be in favor of this, is if there is a pilot at a remote site that is the ONLY one that can deploy any weapons. The aircraft today, especially the more advanced ones, can outfly the physical limits of humans, so remote flying can at times give a tactical advantage, not to mention less weight and safety features to keep the pilot alive. But having a 100% "AI" aircraft that has the ability to launch weapons would be a BIG NO for me. We know how well "software" can be. ;)
 
Russia has been working on this stuff since 2005. They have at least two designs. The first is the Skat, which looks like an autonomous aircraft similar to the X-Bat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_Skat

The second is the Okhotnik S70. It seems to have been designed to act as a wingman for their Su-57 5th gen fighter. It may explain why the Su-57 has such OP sideways and rear pointing radar capability. That would help it to play mothership for several drones. Such drones can also act as sacrificial targets in case the main Su-57 is targeted by enemy missiles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_S-70_Okhotnik-B

You can bet that China has similar tech.
 
Last edited:
Russia has been working on this stuff since 2005. They have at least two designs. The first is the Skat, which looks like an autonomous aircraft like the X-Bat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_Skat

The second is the Okhotnik S70. It seems to have been designed to act as a wingman controlled by their Su-57 5th gen fighter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_S-70_Okhotnik-B

If real hostilities break out with NATO, we'll probably see the Skat and Okhotnik make an appearance.
Russia can’t even keep their 70 year old tech operational. They have nothing modern that’s worth a dam. Their military has been utterly humiliated in Ukraine and the only tactic they’ve ever had that works is to throw more bodies at the situation.
 
The one thing we've learnt in Ukraine is that drones costing $500 can take out tanks costing $10m. This means you lose $500 while your opponent loses $10m. The Ukrainian drone attack on the Russian nuclear bomber fleet cost Ukraine about $20K in drones while Russia lost an estimated $7b in aircraft. Repeat that enough times and your opponent is crippled. It's a similar thing when Ukraine takes out oil refineries with relatively cheap drones. It's basic maths.

The maths just goes a bit wrong when you create drones like this that cost $30m (I'm guessing what they would cost) and your opponent shoots them down with a $100K anti aircraft missile.
 
Clickbait. The article’s claims don’t square with basic reality.

Any platform truly capable of full autonomy, GPS-independent navigation, and multirole combat operations wouldn’t be publicly showcased—it would remain highly classified.

This is the military peeps. They don’t unveil their most advanced weaponry at public industry events nor do they share them with reporters.
They don't reveal how the tech works.

They DO reveal the broad strokes of the newest tools of death for the intimidation factor. The original stealth bomber was revealed in a big press event. I still remember one of the best journalist reactions at the time "$50B and it... flies." (that was back when $50B was a lot).
 
God help us when the politicians no longer have to convince other humans with weapons to keep the citizens in line.

(Humans can commit atrocities but at least there is some morality check before action)
 
Back