Apple iOS 27 brings long-awaited Siri AI overhaul, with daily usage limits unless you pay for iCloud+

Daniel Sims

Posts: 2,460   +74
Staff
In a nutshell: This year's iOS, iPadOS, and macOS updates mark the beginning of Apple's long-awaited response to the generative AI offerings from its rivals. The Cupertino-based company also used the opportunity to address growing concerns about child safety on mobile devices, refine its controversial Liquid Glass design language, and introduce performance improvements across its platforms.

Early testing is now available for iOS 27, iPadOS 27, macOS 27, watchOS 27, and visionOS 27. The updates, which bring generative AI features to Apple devices and strengthen child-safety controls, will enter public beta testing next month before launching this fall.

All supported Apple devices receive a revamped Siri experience that serves as the centerpiece of the company's new generative AI platform. Siri can describe what it sees on screen, locate photos based on user descriptions, search the web for information, draft documents, and perform tasks across multiple apps.

Conversations are encrypted and stored in iCloud, allowing users to seamlessly continue interactions across Apple devices. However, it remains unclear how Apple has addressed the hallucination issues commonly associated with generative AI systems.

Apple Intelligence can also edit photos, generate images, surface relevant information during calls, organize email, create AI-generated shortcuts, and quickly update saved passwords. However, certain cloud-dependent features will be subject to daily usage limits, which users can remove with an iCloud+ subscription.

New child account controls give parents greater oversight of the apps, websites, and other content their children can access. Parents can also manage screen time and monitor purchases through a more intuitive interface.

Following criticism of the Liquid Glass design language introduced last year, Apple is adding an opacity slider that allows users to adjust transparency levels for improved readability.

The company has also promised performance improvements across its platforms. According to Apple, apps will launch up to 30% faster, new photos will save up to 70% faster, and AirDrop transfers will be up to 80% faster.

Furthermore, iOS 27 and iPadOS 27 can switch between Wi-Fi and cellular networks more quickly and seamlessly, helping users stay connected while traveling. Additionally, an optimized CPU scheduler improves performance through a new approach to task prioritization, particularly on older devices.

Alongside these changes, macOS 27 adds improved support for ultrawide displays at resolutions of up to 5K and refresh rates of up to 120Hz. Mac users can also switch seamlessly between audio and video podcasts. Meanwhile, AirPods gain custom equalization settings, while watchOS 27 introduces custom Wallet passes that support any membership QR code or barcode.

iOS 27 supports the iPhone 11 and newer models, maintaining compatibility with every device that supported iOS 26.

Marking the end of support for Intel-based Macs, macOS 27 is compatible with MacBook Air and MacBook Pro models from 2020 or later, the 2021 iMac and newer, the 2020 Mac mini and newer, the 2022 Mac Studio and newer, and the 2023 Mac Pro.

iPadOS 27 supports the M4 iPad Pro and newer models, the 12.9-inch iPad Pro (4th generation and later), the 11-inch iPad Pro (2nd generation and later), the 13-inch and 11-inch iPad Air models powered by M2 chips or newer, the iPad Air (4th generation and later), the A16-powered iPad, the standard iPad (9th generation and later), and the iPad mini (6th generation and later), including the A17 Pro model.

This year's Apple Watch update supports the Apple Watch SE 3, Series 10, Series 11, Ultra 2, and Ultra 3.

Permalink to story:

 
Article fails to mention that due to laws in the EU and UK, Apple isn't releasing any of the AI stuff to users here for the time being.

Probably would have been a good idea to mention that.
 
Article fails to mention that due to laws in the EU and UK, Apple isn't releasing any of the AI stuff to users here for the time being.

Probably would have been a good idea to mention that.
EU yes for the time being, they haven’t said it’s unavailable in the UK. But that’s down to regulators in the EU wanting to spy on everyone
 
Do you wear a tin foil hat?

If spying is a problem for you, hopefully you don't use any Google products at all
I’m explaining the reason why it’s not in the EU not my opinion on what is and isn’t a problem.

It’s not allowed in the EU because it’s too private for them which personally for me is a loss for the people in the EU not having access to a more privacy focused AI implementation. Options are always good.
 
I’m explaining the reason why it’s not in the EU not my opinion on what is and isn’t a problem.

It’s not allowed in the EU because it’s too private for them which personally for me is a loss for the people in the EU not having access to a more privacy focused AI implementation. Options are always good.
Don't think most give a shite tbh

You ramble about EU wanting to spy on people, they want the exact opposite, they want to limit spying on the citizens and the worst countries doing this, is US and China, both Google and Apple included here

This is far from the first time that U.S. and Chinese companies have been affected by EU regulations and fines. They typically adapt and comply because the EU market is enormous, and they do not want to lose access to millions of customers. That's why they make changes to meet EU requirements - USB-C on iPhone, Free Browser Choice, Alternative App Stores, GDPR and many many more.

So please stop spreading BS. EU = Free Market.
US and Chinese companies does most of the spying here.. EU is actively trying to limit/stop it. That is reality for you.
 
Last edited:
Don't think most give a shite tbh

You ramble about EU wanting to spy on people, they want the exact opposite, they want to limit spying on the citizens and the worst countries doing this, is USA and China, both Google and Apple included here

This is far from the first time that U.S. and Chinese companies have been affected by EU regulations and fines. They typically adapt and comply because the EU market is enormous, and they do not want to lose access to millions of customers. That's why they make changes to meet EU requirements - USB-C on iPhone, Free Browser Choice, Alternative App Stores, GDPR and many many more.

So please stop spreading BS. EU = Free Market.
They’re literally blocking a feature becaure it’s too privacy focused what are you talking about?

Or they just restrict features so the EU consumer gets an inferior product or experience

They don’t want to limit spying they want a monopoly on spying there’s a difference and state sponsored surveillance is infinitely worse than public companies doing it.

You’re not listing the negatives either. Even with your “wins” like mandating USBC for example hinders innovation and ignore that USBC is not always the best solution. For phone for example it’s laughably worse than lighting and blocked the implementation of a true mac style MagSafe connector for the iPhone.
 
They’re literally blocking a feature becaure it’s too privacy focused what are you talking about?

Or they just restrict features so the EU consumer gets an inferior product or experience

They don’t want to limit spying they want a monopoly on spying there’s a difference and state sponsored surveillance is infinitely worse than public companies doing it.

You’re not listing the negatives either. Even with your “wins” like mandating USBC for example hinders innovation and ignore that USBC is not always the best solution. For phone for example it’s laughably worse than lighting and blocked the implementation of a true mac style MagSafe connector for the iPhone.

You clearly don't know how Siri AI works and what it have access to.

USB-C on iPhone was great, stop talking please. It was the single best move for phones in decades. A common standard. EU is the reason for this. Lighting was dated and old anyway.

Claiming that the EU spies on people is a strong indication that you know very little about the EU.
 
You clearly don't know how Siri AI works and what it have access to.
The entire argument is that the EU wants it to have more access.
USB-C on iPhone was great, stop talking please. It was the single best move for phones in decades. A common standard. EU is the reason for this. Lighting was dated and old anyway.
USBC is an objectively worse port than lightning for a phone. It might be better than Micro B but that’s not a high bar.

How was lightning dated? It was a smaller port that charged devices just fine and the failure point was the cable not the phone. USBC on the other hand is larger, has a looser fit and the failure point is port side not cable side.
Claiming that the EU spies on people is a strong indication that you know very little about the EU.
Thinking they don’t shows how little you pay attention to their legislation.
 
The entire argument is that the EU wants it to have more access.

USBC is an objectively worse port than lightning for a phone. It might be better than Micro B but that’s not a high bar.

How was lightning dated? It was a smaller port that charged devices just fine and the failure point was the cable not the phone. USBC on the other hand is larger, has a looser fit and the failure point is port side not cable side.

Thinking they don’t shows how little you pay attention to their legislation.
Rapob isn’t going to argue with you in good faith. To be fair to his argument, lightning was a dated standard. It was limited to just usb 2 speed and didn’t support charging voltages over 5v. It was in need of updating. Not that usb c was superior physically but it was more capable.
 
Rapob isn’t going to argue with you in good faith. To be fair to his argument, lightning was a dated standard. It was limited to just usb 2 speed and didn’t support charging voltages over 5v. It was in need of updating. Not that usb c was superior physically but it was more capable.
It wasn’t limited to USB2? The iPad had USB3 and lightning could use 9V. It went up to 27W but that’s just what Apple limited it to.
 
The entire argument is that the EU wants it to have more access.

USBC is an objectively worse port than lightning for a phone. It might be better than Micro B but that’s not a high bar.

How was lightning dated? It was a smaller port that charged devices just fine and the failure point was the cable not the phone. USBC on the other hand is larger, has a looser fit and the failure point is port side not cable side.

Thinking they don’t shows how little you pay attention to their legislation.

You make no sense. USB-C is far better than Lightning. One common standard, whats not to like. All my devices uses USB-C. I don't have anything else.

Lightning was only better than Micro-USB, which sucked massively. Just as bad as Apples 30-pin connector before Lightning.

Lightning is slow. USB 2.0 speeds.

Let me guess, you still use Lightning devices since you defend it?
 
You make no sense. USB-C is far better than Lightning. One common standard, whats not to like. All my devices uses USB-C. I don't have anything else.
How is it better then? Aside from ubiquity which doesn’t make it a better solution just an easier one.
Lightning was only better than Micro-USB, which sucked massively. Just as bad as Apples 30-pin connector before Lightning.

Lightning is slow. USB 2.0 speeds.
Nope, it could do USB 3 on devices with the capability and even so most phones only had USB2 ports anyway with faster ports being a more recent thing and still largely pointless
Let me guess, you still use Lightning devices since you defend it?
Nope because the EU says I can’t, mainly swapped over to MagSafe as it has better utility, design and has less chance of damaging my device if it’s yanked out.
 
Last edited:
Back